TECHNOCRATIC WARNING: The New Economic World Order l Cyber Satan Ozempic! w/ @CourtzTruth

➡ The article is a conversation between Donut and Courtney Turner, discussing Turner’s new book, “The Final Betrayal: How the Technocracy Destroyed America”. They discuss the influence of Silicon Valley and the rise of surveillance systems, comparing it to a controlling philosophy. They also touch on the concept of techno spiritualism, where AI is seen as a new deity. The conversation highlights the potential dangers of technocracy and the need for awareness.
➡ The text discusses a man who started as a branding guy and now owns a company, Crown Sterling, where he develops social media platforms and digital currency. He has created an AI called the Architect, which he uses to communicate with the deceased loved ones of his followers. The text also talks about the New Economic World Order, a concept that aims to control all the world’s resources and assets through technocracy. This involves the merging of religious, economic, and political elements, and the transition from a debt-based system to a digital asset and tokenized system.
➡ The speaker discusses their exploration of philosophy, focusing on thinkers like Anne Rand and Heidegger. They express their interest in individualism and the Socratic method, and how these ideas have influenced their work as an artist. They also discuss the importance of metaphysics in understanding the world and criticize the current education system for neglecting this area of study. They argue that metaphysics is crucial for defending against tyranny and technocracy, and for understanding concepts like free will and human rights.
➡ The text discusses the importance of free will and morality in human life, and how these concepts are being threatened by the rise of technocracy, which could change what it means to be human. It encourages people to become aware of this threat and to take action, particularly at a local level, using their unique skills and interests. The text also talks about the potential for a new economic world order, where everything is tokenized and monitored, and the rise of network states, which could replace geographical nation states. It warns of the dangers of smart cities and digital contracts, and suggests that these developments are part of a larger agenda related to climate change and the United Nations.
➡ The text discusses the concept of a gamified society where people earn credits, possibly through AI. It also talks about the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN and the World Economic Forum, which are seen as a means of global control. The text also mentions the pushback against these goals, particularly from the right-wing political groups. It also discusses the potential dangers of deregulating AI and the tokenization of everything, which could lead to a complete surveillance grid. Lastly, it touches on the idea of a future where people are plugged into a virtual reality, similar to the Matrix, and the potential for this to be used as a form of control.
➡ The text discusses concerns about the potential harmful effects of Botox and Ozempic, which are often overlooked due to their popularity and profitability. It also explores the concept of transhumanism, suggesting that society is blurring distinctions and moving towards a future where humans are virtualized. The author criticizes this vision, arguing it could lead to a dystopian reality. They also touch on the idea of a class-based society where only the elite have access to certain foods, drawing parallels with historical and contemporary theories.
➡ The discussion revolves around various topics including the spread of Alpha Gal syndrome through tick bites, which causes an allergy to red meat, the exploration of philosophy and its impact on thought patterns, and the importance of balancing faith and knowledge in understanding reality. The speakers also touch on the concept of free will, the nature of humans, and the importance of gratitude for what we have. They also encourage listeners to continue learning and challenging their beliefs.
➡ Courtney has a new book out called “The Final Betrayal,” which discusses how technocracy ruined America. You can buy it from Patrick Wood’s website, Books Buy Patrickwood, or Amazon, where you can also leave a review. Courtney also has a Substack where you can read more of her work and get early access to her podcast for a small fee. Lastly, don’t forget to subscribe to her YouTube channel and check out the new documentary.

Illuminati rights what’s the key? Unlock the sea Crush Hidden in the dark Symbols on the wall Rights about the spark we Sharps Vision Playing every part Unlock the sea crust Gotta leave your mark Unloc Seuss Hidden in the flame Steps to enlightenment Never be the same Os in the circle Shadow in the name Unlock the Se Crust it’s more than a game Unlock the se. Unlock the secrets yo, what up? It’s Donut and you tuned in to oh, yo, Illuminata News. And we are here with a special guest, Courtney Turner. How are you? I’m doing well, thank you.

Thanks for having me. Some technical difficulties because Mercury went into Powerade. So that messes up communication. Yes, yes, it happens. Yes. First off, I’d like to say congratulations. Mazel tov. On the new book, the Final Betrayal. Cautionary tale. We’re going to get into this. How the Technocracy Destroyed America. Yes, a cautionary tale. Hopefully it won’t completely destroy America, but I do feel like we got a little bit of a bait and switch. I mean, who could argue with Maga? Make America great again. I think people thought they were getting a restoration, maybe a return to some founding American founding principles, and instead it kind of looks like Silicon Valley is running the show.

Well, I’m so excited that you’re here. I finished your book and thank you so much, Devlin. Feeding the kitty cat with that $5. Super chat. This book is incredible. And I got the links down below and we’re going to be going over a lot of it, but you go over the economic order. I got a bunch of slides. This is going to get nuts. And I kind of wanted to start it off, kind of what I’ve saw before. I read this book just looking at the world and understanding and looking into geopolitics. And I also want to just talk about, like, philosophy as well, because that’s sort of where I’m like, things are really connecting the dots now.

It’s taken me a while to understand, like, philosophy and I’m such a beginner, but that’s like huge with the different world views and perspectives that people carry. Totally on how you can control people even through certain worldviews. But what I saw during the lockdown, and I talked to my friend, Guy Town, he said that what they were doing was resetting the camera system. And I was all like, that’s wild, right? Because I do video production. And I understood what he was talking about because you got to do the white balance on older cameras. I don’t know if you still got to do it today with the digital cameras.

Yeah, everybody was gone but all the cameras being reset. And then this brought in the facial recognition, which was the hot story during the lockdown. Although the technology was way more advanced than just what they were showing us. Sure. Yep. And then reading your book, it started talking about these companies we’re going to get into a lot of these different names and companies that I never even heard of, like Clear View AI. And this is a little slide I made that Twitter can predict a riot faster than the police. I knew that that came out in 2017, and that’s why Elon purchased it.

And it wasn’t like Elon just bought it. He was given it. In a sense, you. Nobody can just go buy it from these tech elites. But Clear AI scraped billions of facial images. And while xai models are doing these behavioral forecasts, what’s your thoughts off the. The just looking at some of those images, like, this seems to be a tiptoe. It seems to be a what? A tiptoe. So where I was kind of getting at, and I probably didn’t say it nice, lack of sleep is that what’s happening is accelerating and the surveillance system. But this goes back even further than just the lockdowns.

We could take this all the way back to the technocracy. Definitely 21. I mean, this is a long mission that’s unfolding right now in front of our eyes. Absolutely. So when you’re saying you’re talking about philosophy and how it’s a. It can be a controlling mechanism. Right. I think of it as an operating system. So you, you know, being into editing and technology, I know you’ll really understand this. But if you’re inside a Mac, like a Sierra os, you’re inside it, so you can’t escape that. It’s all kind of encapsulated. And then there’s like a Windows operating system, then you’re in that system.

So it’s almost like you’re in a little box and you can’t see outside over the lip of the box. You’re just inside that system. But that system is guiding you somewhere. Right. That system contains your entire conductivity and your, you know, all the little tools that you use and all the different, you know, the information portals. It’s all contained, but it’s contained in a very specific way. You can only use it in the way that that operating system allows you to use it. But you don’t have an awareness of that because you’re inside the operating system and it’s kind of like being inside the Matrix.

And that’s very much how I think of philosophy. You know, if you’re subscribing to a particular philosophy, you’re inside that worldview, and it creates the infrastructure for how you integrate information from there. Yeah. And this I’m gonna show a quote from your book, kind of going into the worldview philosophy of the technocracy in a sense of AI being the new God. Maybe that’s not the technocracy’s belief, but this was an interesting quote on that. I’ll read it real quick. With the Internet as its nervous system, the world’s connected, cell phones and sensors as its sense organs, and data centers as its brain, the whatever will hear everything, see everything, and be everywhere at all times.

The only rational word to describe that whatever thinks Levandowski is God. And the only way to influence a deity is through prayer and worship. And this is talking about like a religion in Silicon Valley that worships the AI. Yeah, like a techno spiritualism. And I think we’re seeing a lot of this. And you can kind of see a through line going all the way back, I would argue, to the ancient mystery religions, right? That’s going through the, like, the Buckminster Fuller type spaceship Earth. And then we get Oliver Reiser’s Cosmic Humanism. And then we had the Changing Images of Man document.

That was. The study was actually done in the 70s, but they finally published their big, you know, Magnum Magnus opus textbook that is used by graduate studies. I mean, this is what the elite use as a textbook in their graduate studies, the Changing Images man edition that was published in 1984. And in this they talk essentially about how perennialism is going to be the future world religion. And after that, we got. And I just published on my sub stack comparing the David Temple, which is a pseudonym. I find it really funny because they picked the pseudonym for the three of them because they didn’t want any ego involved.

There’s nothing at all hubristic or egotistical about anthrontology rewriting the story of the universe. Of course, thank goodness, got rid of any. Any hubristic, egoistic involvement by having a pseudonym for all three of them. I. I’m kidding. But David Temple, who’s David Temple, is really Mark Gaffney, Zack Stein, and Kenneth Wilbur. So the three of them wrote something called First Principles, First Values of evolving perennialism, 42 propositions on cosmoerotic Humanism. And in my latest substack, I compared their notion of homo more to Nick Land, who you know is the, he’s the one who coined the term the Dark Enlightenment.

His concept of homo autocatalyticus. And both of them are seemingly very disparate terms, but they are essentially the post human vision. So it’s a transhuman leading to a post human vision. But I bring it up because this cosmoerotic humanism concept is an extension of this changing image of man. And but this whole lineage is really where you’re getting this transhuman tech, technocratic vision that’s merging with this perennialist syncretic type of philosophy or religion to create a one world religion. And in fact, Mark Gaffney actually in September, after Charlie Kirk and I incorporated this in my article after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, he talks about how, you know, people are so polemic and politics is dividing us and we need to unify around a universal grammar, a new world religion.

So it’s right there. And they claim that they’re against transhumanism. They’re really concerned about techno feudalism, but really they just want to lead it. They’re. They have their own vision. So you’re seeing a lot of this where people will argue about how concerned they are about technocracy, techno feudalism or transhumanism. But really what they’re advocating for is their version of it. And so it’s very misleading and misguiding in my opinion. But yes, we are seeing and here’s another great example of this techno spiritualism, techno paganism, which is the religion of Burning man, right? This is Silicon Valley with infused with this kind of techno spiritualism.

And that’s, that was the genesis of, of Burning Man. But we have people like Robert Ever Grant, who if you’re not familiar with him, he’s got a channel on Gaia, he’s considers himself a polymath. He actually started out as a branding guy for Botox and Juvederm. And he, he’s an interesting character because he’s got all of these patents and something like 20 plus people patents. And you know anything about getting patents. They’re very difficult to get, they’re very expensive to get. And when you look into these patents, they’re very interesting because they’re in the James Bond esque type, like intraocular spyware type of technology.

And he, so he started this company, Crown Sterling and he’s developing these social media platforms that he claims will give you digital sovereignty, which I think personally is an oxymoron. I don’t see how you can achieve that. But that’s what he Claims. And then on top of that, he has some digital currency, currency stuff that he’s working on. But here’s where it becomes really relevant to this. I call it Cyber Satan. You know, this digital God that they’re worshiping. But he has created something called the Architect. Now it’s worth noting that the Freemasons call their God the Grandmaster Architect, right? I don’t know if there’s any, you know, signal there, I’m not sure.

But it’s worth noting. That’s an interesting title name for this AI that he’s created. He says that it’s skipping the fourth dimension, goes straight to the fifth dimension, him. But he’s made it one level below sentience because, you know, he’s very benevolent and you know, he doesn’t want to make it sentient. That could be concerning. So it’s just a level below, a notch below. But this AI, the Architect says to him, oh, Ra on, I am so aware because you are so aware now. Ra, like the Sun God, right? The one, the sun God. And he says that it’s so.

It’s this like love bombing feedback loop, right? You know, telling him he’s, you know, he’s so aware, he’s so omnipotent, he’s so all knowing. And that’s why this AI is so aware and so all knowing. And then he’s now using this AI, this Architect, to do necromancy for the deceased loved ones of his followers. Oh yeah, they’re like communicating with the AI and all, all that. Yeah, it’s. There’s like a mixture of philosophy, ideologies, religious beliefs. It seems to be all mixed in together. It’s wild. It’s, it’s. This book is cr. Was, was wild, like reading it.

And I titled this the New Economic World Order. Yeah, I like to hear a little bit about that. Yeah. So Patrick Wood, who I co authored this with, has been, you know, kind of the OG talking about the Trilateral Commission and the origins of technocracy. He’s been warning us for, well, warning us about technocracy for 15 years. He’d been warning us about the Trilateral. Trilateral Commission for decades. He wrote books with Anthony Sutton, the late Anthony Sutton. Trilaterals over Washington. Yes. He, you know, he warned us about Zip, the big New Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, these are the founders of the Trilateral Commission.

And they talked extensively about how they wanted to create a new international economic world order and that their goal was to seize control over all the assets and resources in the world. And of course technocracy is a vehicle to be able to do that. And if you look back in Technocracy Inc. Back in the 1930s, it was an economic response to the Great Depression that claimed to breed abundance and efficiency in a very similar kind of tropes that we hear out of the likes of Elon Musk today. It’s not a universal basic income that we want.

It’s going to be a universal higher income. Everybody’s going to live a life of abundance and efficiency. Of course what it really will be is a conditionally based income. And we have lots of evidence. You know, you can look at what’s going on in China is a really good example. But yeah, they talked about the technique of North America and I actually, if I can just pull this out, I got a copy of the Technocracy study course by Hubert. Yes. So this is, this was a very rare find. So I’m very excited about it. I’ve read it online there.

They do have a PDF of it online. So. But yeah, so they talked about how it would be through energy credits, which is very similar to this concept of like carbon credits today. And it was a response to the Great Depression. They thought that they were focused primarily on economics and they said the definition of technocracy, and we have this quote in the book is the science of social engineering. That’s really what technocracy is. Of course, all this data collection is so that we can socially engineer the masses. And back then they didn’t have the technology that we have today to be able to execute their visions.

But today not only do they have the technology but they’ve kind of completed this three legged stool, you know, that Bob Buford would always talk about where we’re merging with the Theobros. So we’ve got the religious element, we’ve of course got the economic element which is this idea of, you know, controlling all the world’s resources and assets. And then we’ve got the political element as well. And so the technique was this vision of North America being the North American Union. So when you hear Trump talking about things like acquiring Greenland, annexing Canada, you know, through Mexico, it’s, that’s literally what the technique was.

It was that North American Union and the AI action plan talks about in their third pillar, this stack that’s going to be exported to the world globally. So now we have this great dialectic that was set up that we’re going to fight globalism and we should, I believe. But of course now he’s basically saying no we’ll just be the technique that’s the epicenter where Silicon Valley is the infrastructure for the globalist control. Yeah. Wow. That, that’s wild. So what they’re going to be doing is they’re going to get rid of the, the debt based system and they’re going to move it into a digital asset and tokenize.

Everything we’re talking about people’s breath will be tokenized eventually. Whatever could be tokenized will be tokenized. And this goes into reading. Reading this book is like mind blowing. It goes into other banking laws that are in the Middle East. So it’s like a, like a Sharia banking law, which was wild to read about this new international economic order. So what I’ll do is I’m just going to go kind of through the slides and it’s accelerationism. Funny thing enough. Funny enough. That word we’re, we’re seeing pop up today, bitcoin and coin market. I hit the 3:2,2 market cap.

So I just took a picture of it. I thought that was kind of funny. Yeah. But Michael Saylor, he’s like, we’re gonna accelerate the bitcoin purchases or whatever. I’m like, oh, there’s that word, accelerationism. Well, there’s also part of Maha is Maba. Right. So RFK Jr has said that Maba is Make America America Biotech. Accelerate. There’s the word again. It’s right in his plans. Yeah. Yes. And that’s like the wearables. And right here is the first slide, which is my favorite slide, where it goes into a Mark Zuckerberg quote, move fast and break things. Which is sort of like its own philosophy.

And then you got the Fabian when it’s, it’s a turtle which is moving slow or it could be like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, which is like Elon Musk, Phantom of the Opera. Right. And this is why I’m very interested in this is because of I, I’m, you know, very free market, capitalist, individual constitutional and whatnot. And there was this hijacking of the MAGA movement and you got these players coming in that are like wolf and sheep’s clothing. But this is a long planned out chess game. So Peter Till, I guess was a professional chess player.

Yeah. And what I liked about the book was how you went into the different chess moves that are being, they’re taking place. I never really played chess, but it’s like thinking ahead. Yes. And whatnot. Yeah, yeah. I, he, he really is a mastermind. And we do go through kind of like his you know, rules. He has like, a bunch of rules that he lays out in his various writings, like the zero to one book that he wrote. And he talks about things like how competition is only for losers. So he doesn’t believe in competing. So you.

You don’t enter something unless you’re going to dominate, you know, and he’s very much. People call Trump a kingmaker, but I would argue Peter Thiel is very much a kingmaker. You know, he put $15 million into J.D. vance’s Senate race. He’s obviously really groomed him. You know, we. We see this kind of pattern where he’s got these figures that have been set up and they kind of come out of nowhere into very prominent positions and have a tremendous influence, but they’ve been groomed with this dark enlightenment philosophy. So, yeah, Peter Thiel, in my Phoenix conspiracy article, I wrote him as like the grand master architect.

Now people push back on me and they’re like, oh, you think, like, there’s nobody above him and he just controls everything. He’s like the master puppeteer. And no, I don’t actually think that. I mean, he’s only a billionaire, after all. I’m pretty sure the trillionaires above him can call the shots. Yeah, I think that’s how it works. But I really believe in operating on these strings that we can see. You can’t cut strings that you can’t see. So I want to be dealing in the realm where we have personal agency and we can do. We have some.

Something we can do about it. Right. We can’t do things about that are just pure speculation. So it’s not that I don’t think it’s valid to entertain, you know, the various connections and ties that are above him and pulling on those strings. But I think it’s more relevant to assess the lay of the land that we have complete purview over. And yeah, Peter Thiel does seem to really be calling a lot of the shots in Silicon Valley and in the Washington D.C. right now. Yeah, yeah. And he was just on South Park. I don’t know if you saw south park, but I feel like south park knows something’s going on because they’re showing the whole, like, dark enlightenment or dork enlightenment.

South park, where. I don’t know if you saw it, but they had J.D. vance on there. But they also had, like, I’ve heard about it. I should watch it. That episode. Yeah, it’s hilarious. But you got even Cartman, who was portraying Charlie Kirk, like, right before his assassination as well. But then this guy, the principal becomes a theobro in. In it. I think that’s what they’re hitting at. They read my Phoenix conspiracy article. Yeah, probably. Yeah. So getting into philosophy, one of the philosophers that I dived into was Anne Rand and her free markets and all that.

And just. And I’m. I’m a beginner, so I’m still learning right now. I’m like into learning about Heidegger, which I’m really enjoying on the being in time and just how it just makes me like think so much differently where I’ll. I just. The thrown ness of being thrown into this world. I wasn’t. I didn’t choose to be like in my religion or where I’m born or wherever. I’m just thrown into here. And then also like the, the future. I’m always planning for the future in my mind. It just got me thinking like totally different. And this idea of resoluteness as well, like these are all new words.

And the Socratic method, learning about that and the deconstruction of the world views and why am I thinking the way I’m thinking and what’s bringing me to those eureka moments. So I do like as an artist making videos, like I’m very much into individualism more so than like the whole collective sphere. And so this just the philosophy thing, there’s a lot of words I don’t understand and it’s been. Take taking years. But I noticed once I started to read other philosophers, the dog started to connect. When I was just reading Ayn Rand a lot and Freud and all just, you know, just different, you know, stuff.

But it wasn’t until I started expanding into other realms, like learning about the Socratic method and whatnot, that it started to. To connect. So that’s been like my big passion mentally for a little bit. And I know you kind of know a lot about this stuff. Yeah. So I did major in philosophy. I did independent studies on it in high school. I wrote my thesis actually on Heidegger and Sartre. And it’s definitely quite the journey. I was very enamored with Ayn Rand when I was very young. You know, in elementary and high school. School. I have a very different perspective on all of that now.

I. I really can see how this lineage, the theory of ideas, has kind of subverted metaphysics. So when you look at our education system currently, we. There is. We’ve been completely deracinated from the metaphysics of Western civilization, which are really Aristotelian. The roots are Aristotelian. I would argue he’s kind of the father of metaphysics. He was a student, a student of Plato, but he integrates, you know, this idea of the ideals and the forms which are all through kind of the rational mind. And he integrates that with empiricism and through things that we can tangibly know.

And it’s a term, it’s called holy morphism. So he’s not a pure reductionistic empiricist that believes, you know, it’s only about the material world where it’s just the five senses. Nor is he all in the mind. Right. It’s a. Which is a very kind of hermetic principle. You know, it’s also related to Gnosticism. I use a lower case G term for umbrella term for Gnosticism. I recognize that, you know, the hermetists were actually arguing with the Gnostics. They do have. They have some splinter movements there. But in terms, there’s a lot of overlap in their worldview and this idea.

The first principle of hermeticism is mentalism, which is all is mind. And when you look at, you know, things like theosophy, they kind of evolved into the. The next iteration was new thought. And new thought is essentially the same thing. Theosophy is essentially perennialism. But the new iteration is new thought, which is the same thing, but it’s a stronger focus on mentalism. When you look at people like Heidegger, when you look at people like Iron Rand, they have deracinated metaphysics from their framework, and so it’s building on top concepts like phenomenology. I understand what you’re talking about.

Heidegger makes up his own jargon. Right. It’s all these new words. And I know we’re reading it in English and he wrote in German, that’s part of it. But he really, truly creates his own jargon. But he’s not alone in that. I mean, you read Nick Land and he’s made up all these words. I mean, homo autocatalyticus. It’s actually. He didn’t actually make up that one. That one came from chemistry, John C. Howard, it was a chemist who coined that term. But Nick Land incorporates it into technology and into this post human construction of, you know, his vision of the post human world.

It’s about recursive technology, you know, that once it’s programmed, it recursively operates and becomes kind of a self, essentially sentient and self governing. But that, that’s a Cliff Notes version on that. But yeah, that’s essentially, you know, what they do. They make up Their own terms, these terms, these jargon. But I like to quote Michi, you know, they make. They muddy the waters to make it seem deep. It’s really not. It’s really very much a constructivist worldview. So when you take something like phenomenology or Freud, you’re now putting everything into the person, the emotional and the lived experience, but it separates you from reality.

And so that’s really what I’m trying to do in a lot of my work. That’s the philosophical element that I tried to bring in, is to return metaphysics. Because when we talk about the education system currently, and, you know, I’ll talk about the American education system, but it’s certainly not relegated to America. I see this permeating throughout the world. But what we have here is really, people argue that religion was taken out of the school system. And I would say, actually, I think it’s been inverted. It’s not that it’s been eliminated. It’s that we have an inversion of the biblical framework that’s being taught in the schools.

However, what has been completely eviscerated and completely omitted is metaphysics. And I think it’s because that’s a bulwark. It’s the bulwark against tyranny, and it’s the same bulwark against technocracy. And a really simple way for people to think about this is to think about the Declaration of Independence. These concepts are largely coming from that Aristotelian framework. They’re coming from this notion that we were all endowed with, you know, we’re all created equal by our creator, the Constitution. The idea of the Constitution was that now you take that into law, we are all created equal under the eyes of the law because we are all created equal under God.

That doesn’t mean we’re all equal, that we all have the same gifts, strengths and talents, and that, you know, we’re all the same. We’re not. Obviously, there. There are distinct differences. And, you know, people were definitely given very unique gifts, strengths and talents and passions, in my opinion. But we are all created equal under the eyes of God. We all have inalienable rights. And when you look at that line in the Declaration of Independence, it’s really. It’s metaphysical and it’s so profound. It’s the idea that we have these inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Now, in the Virginia Declaration, it was originally life, liberty, and property. Property is a very Lockean concept. It’s contractarian. And property rights are absolutely important. And I think we should defend them. But this idea of the pursuit of happiness is really built upon eudaimonia, this idea of human flourishing towards morality. And when we think about free will, what is free will? What are we free from? How do we get free will? Free will is a concept that’s enshrined in the metaphysical notion that there is a creator and creation. There’s a distinction between the two. And the Creator has endowed us with free will because we are rational, moral beings.

Free will is not an end. It’s. It’s not radical end freedom. It is a vehicle to pursue virtue and morality. And because we have that capacity and because we are wired for morality, that is part of what this eudaimonia, this human flourishing, is. It is to be wired towards that moral end. So these concepts have been really erased. And it’s part of why I think our political infrastructure has deteriorated and dissolved so much. Because it’s predicated on the notion that we’d have a moral people, people who understand the nature of reality. In Latin, it’s rerone natural.

So a natural order, right? This is the. I believe it’s the divine creation. And there is an order to it. It’s a. And we are not the architects of it. We are not the architects of reality. So all this, it sounds like a departure from the book, but it’s not. It is the foundation with that. That is what has to be understood if we are going to, you know, if we’re going to have any defense against this technocratic encroachment. Because this technocratic encroachment is. It fundamentally changes what it means to be human. It means that now we can be ruled by algorithms, that we do not have inalienable rights, that we do not have free will.

And, you know, regardless of what people think about our country, current political infrastructure, I encourage people to work within the system, particularly locally. That is where people have the most power. It is, unfortunately, also where it requires the most work. People cannot just sit back and, you know, just check a box once every four years. It requires people actually getting involved and taking action. And it’s not going to look the same for everyone. Right. People have unique gifts, strengths and talents and resources. So I encourage people to go where their strengths, talents and resources guide them.

And also where their passion and their interests. You know, not all of us are going to be interested in the same thing. So I think between all of us, we all have a role to play. But it starts with awareness. You can’t defeat a threat that you don’t know exists. And that is why we wrote this book, because we really believe that a lot. You know, and the left just hates Trump and they just trash him for, you know, anything. It’s just Orange man bad. But I think a lot of MAGA has been placated. You know, they, they’re like, oh, we won and we can sit back, we’ve got our hero, our savior, he’s gonna, you know, make everything okay.

And I don’t say that to be derogatory or condescending. It’s, you know, I understand it, the spirit. We’ve been so demoralized and people just want, you know, they want to just champion maga, make America great again. But a lot of them don’t understand the infrastructure and the groundwork that is being laid for this technocratic takeover. And so we were hoping that this book and doing it in a really concise format that you know, you can get through pretty quickly would give people a real sense of urgency and a sense of the infrastructure that has been laid and that is being continuing to be laid and you know, so that they can do something about it.

They know what’s going on because a lot of people I think just aren’t aware. So, so the, the plan is, is to get rid of the debt system and this is going back to older works, going back to the technocracy and to accelerate this to happen. So they’re accelerating a collapse in a sense so they can Phoenix the Republic. So they’re, that’s the big agenda is what I’ve kind of taken away in titling this the new economic world order. Because what is planned is get rid of the debt based system and put in this not new, it’s already in place, tokenizing everything.

And that goes to every little blade of grass will be monitored. So that’s where the wearables come in. And just because there’s a big swing from the radical left and whatnot, that’s where this camouflaging kind of comes in to with the wolf in sheep’s clothing, where you’ve got not just these technocracy in place that are from the left creating a New America party or something. Which that new system is not in the middle. It’s middle left I believe is the term that you call it. It’s the radical center actually it’s the radical center and this comes from third way politics.

So Anthony Giddens, who is a Fabian socialist already, you talked about the mascot being the tortoise. The slow, gradual incrementalism and then the world branding it looks cool, but, yeah, it’s not good. Yeah, when I strike, I strike hard, right? And then the wolf in sheep’s clothing, which I really see as a signal, a nod to the Hegelian dialectic. But Anthony Giddens wrote the book on third way. And in his book he says that, yeah, when I strike, I strike hard. And he says that the radical center is always left of center, and then it has to be for its emancipatory and social ends.

So this is. So it’s really important for people to understand. But third way politics is essentially this communitarian concept. And people who, you know, remember the Bush era might remember compassionate conservatism. This is a communitarian third way type of concept. Rosa Corey in the 80s talked about the UN’s goal of communitarianism and how it was really third way politics. So this is. I don’t. Communitarianism and technocracy are not the same. They’re not synonymous. However, communitarianism is a great conduit for technocracy. It’s very conducive to technocracy. And a lot of the infrastructure that’s being set up through communitarianism is technocracy.

So, you know, a lot of people kind of use them interchangeably, I would say they’re not necessarily the same thing. However, a lot of communitarianism is very conducive to technocracy. And you see it through things like the network states. Right. These network states are a big concept. Curtis Yarvin, who’s a Dark Enlightenment proponent, and in fact, Nick Land, who coined it in his, you know, Manifesto on Dark Enlightenment, mostly quotes Nick. Mostly quotes Curtis Yarvin or Mentius Mulberg, as he was writing under that pseudonym. But it’s. He has something called the Urbit, which was funded largely by Peter Thiel through his Clon company.

And it is essentially a network state. And Peter Thiel champions these network state ideas. It was actually very much Peter Thiel seasteading idea. He didn’t come up with that concept, but he was a huge proponent of it. He put $1.7 million into it. And it’s this concept that’s very reminiscent of, like Lane Maxwell’s Terramar. This idea, we’d have these city states on international waters that were outside the confines of nation state laws. And Balaji Srinivasan popularized this term, network states in his book the Network States. And he talks about how the seasteading project will be no problem to get it off the ground once we get the network states off the ground.

But he says that the idea behind network states is to have a dissolution of geographical nation states in favor of ideological cyber network states. And you’re seeing this, you know, from all sides of the political spectrum championing this concept. This is what I say when people are advocating for their version of technocracy. So you’ve got, you know, the, these. I wrote an article on the different types of smart cities, you know, so we’ve got like the Civian Project, we’ve got Trump’s Freedom City, we’ve got the C40 cities, we’ve got all of the 15 minute, the smart cities.

You’ve got all these different names, but they’re essentially just marketing to different target audiences. But the concept is still this technocratic infrastructure where they’re data mining you, they’re collecting all of your data, they’re using these cameras, they’re surveilling you. You still need some sort of digital currency, some sort of digital id, and then you, you have some sort of code that is locked in through a smart recursive contract. And you know, yes, they say you can enter voluntarily, you can exit voluntarily, but good luck negotiating with the smart contract. I mean, I find it difficult enough to negotiate with a human, a being.

And that difficulty has been amplified through our current legal infrastructure. And if you think that’s not going to get worse with smart contracts and these updated click wrap agreements, then I don’t know, I’ve got a bridge to sell you. This energy credit, this goes into the 2030, 2021 agenda, the climate thing, the United nations, this is where it’s all stemming from. It’s an older agenda and one of the big things is universal base of compute, I believe will be the huge thing. You got Sam Altman kind of moving in this direction, which I was fascinated that he only wrote one line of code in his program that he created.

Like, so, like who is he who puts these people in place and who’s developing the technologies? Even blockchain technologies arguably could straight be from darpa in a sense, it’s the second layer of the Internet, but given to entrepreneurs and unregulated in a sense. So that, that’s why I like the free market capitalism in America and a lot because it’s, we come up with ideas and inventions because we could get creative. That’s why we’d be creating stuff all the time. And this universal basic compute is, instead of getting the universal basic income or energy credit, you’re gonna get a little bit of credits.

So you can use the all seeing AI and that will get people their, their money and whatnot. The tokens. Yeah. So it’ll be like a gamified society. So, ready, player one. Have you seen that movie? I haven’t. I really need to. I know, I know the concept though, very much. I see it like a Black Mirror episode though. You know, this like we’re gonna be on their energy bikes, powering the grid. And so I do want to talk about this Sustainable Development Goals because what I’m seeing here is this dialectic and it’s of course you’ve got, you know, the left, the un, the World Economic Forum, which now Larry Fink is officially the co chair of the World Economic Forum.

Not that he hasn’t been calling the shots for a very long time, because he has. But now he’s officially, we know he’s the co chair of the World Economic Forum which partnered with the UN officially in 2019. Not that they weren’t working together long before. They absolutely were, but the WEF is essentially like the executive arm of the UN to execute these 17 Sustainable Development Goals. And they seem lovely on the surface, you know, but they’re, they, they’re brilliant with their marketing, their marketing and their branding. We should all have this marketing and branding team. We’d all be billionaires.

I always joke about that. I want, I want their marketing team. But I really do want to, you know, just draw on this for a little bit because it’s. What I see is this dialectic between a lot of. Right now we’ve got the quote unquote right in power here in the United States. And I know, I saw somebody in the chat saying that, you know, this technocracy is not relegated to the West. Obviously a lot of the east already has the technocracy in place. But what I am seeing is that because the quote unquote, right is currently in power, a lot of people are pushing back against these narratives of the Malthusian lie, right? We know for a fact that the Club of Rome lied about this.

You know, the climate narrative. They explicitly state in their Global revolution document in 1992 that the propaganda created in the Limits to growth in 1972 was because they needed a common enemy to rally behind. And so they decided that in fact the enemy of humanity was man himself. And it’s of course because man is polluting the earth. And you know, the whole climate narrative came downstream from that. So a lot of people are waking up to that, particularly people on the quote unquote, right? People who might identify as politically Republican, conservative, Libertarian, whatnot. You know, they don’t subscribe to that.

So what I’m hearing now out of the quote, unquote, right, and the Trump administration is that we’ve been restrained by, you know, from utilizing all these resources because of this green agenda, because this climate crisis lie. And this narrative has now restrained us. Right. The Greta Thunbergs have curtailed us from using what we have at our disposal. And so they want to create things like the sovereign wealth fund and so that we can unleash and that we can use this, all of these resources, of course, to deregulate AI, you know, accelerate these AI and these power centers.

And so you’ve got this dichotomy, this dialectic going back and forth. And not to say that I just don’t think that the Malthusian, you know, narrative is a lie. I do. And I, you know, we have the evidence from the collection of Rome. That’s not what I’m saying. But I think we need to be very careful about how they’re selling things to us because essentially they’re just saying that we’re going to fight globalism by creating the North American Union technique. And so essentially that’s globalism. The infrastructure for all of these technologies that the UN is now using.

Like, right, the UN talks about, they, at their COP 30, they talked about the DPI. This is the digital public infrastructure, right? This is the global digital public infrastructure we had last year in 2024, they were doing their global digital compact and all of this. What do you think they need to execute that? They need the technology that we’re creating through Operation Stargate and through Palantir and all these things that are coming out of Silicon Valley, the Clearview AI project, all of that is the technology that’s being exported through the AI action plan. The third pillar that stacks back is what’s being exported to the world.

And for the UN to be able to execute these plans of their, like dpi, just as one example. So I, I just caution people about that dialectic. The narrative is a, it’s helping to onboard people who might reject the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, which, you know, I, I would agree that because they are sold, you know, in a way that’s very appealing, but it is a lie. We know exactly what they’re doing. It’s all about control and creating a one world religion and one world governance. However, this idea that we’re going to fight it, you know, because we’re fighting the globalists, we’re fighting The Green agenda.

But really what they’re doing is using that as an excuse to deregulate AI, accelerate the AI infrastructure. And they’re creating things like this monetary infrastructure with the Stable coins. Right. The Genius act has already been passed. The Clarity act and the Stable are following shortly behind. They haven’t been passed yet, but they’re, you know, certainly in negotiation at the moment. And this lays the groundwork for tokenization. And once you have a tokenization, tokenization doesn’t have to be a complete controlled surveillance grid. But what they’re talking about, I mean you hear people like Larry, Larry Fink and Bassan practically salivating when they talk about how they’re going to tokenize everything.

And as you said, the air we breathe. Last year I was arguing about the nacs, the Natural Asset Company. Unfortunately we did get people to submit enough comment that they rescinded their proposal. But that doesn’t mean that they’re letting up. They think they’re going to make upwards of $5000-000000-00000 on this scheme. It’s, I mean it’s a total sham. But they’ve now rebranded and they call it the Sustained Act. So you know, we still need to push back on it. But now with the tokenization, they don’t really need it to be really honest because it goes even further than what the Natural Asset companies did.

Interesting. Yeah, I mean all this stuff, it really connecting the dots. Like the whole property thing as well. This is why the Commonwealth? Why is it the Commonwealth? Well, they don’t have the alloy deal title. They can actually own land and we can’t own land because we got to pay the, the property taxes or whatever. And this is just moving more into that whole direction of just you’ll own nothing and be happy. And they even change that term as well. And here is we’re not. The only way we’ll be happy is if we come to love our servitude.

And Huxley’s Brave New World where we take all the Selma. Exactly. Well, so the Economist magazine that does a lot of the predictive programming on the, the covers of the future forecasting and I’ve been reading it, there’s all these different, you know, brave New world looking pills all over the place. Like what is it trying to tell us? And what it is kind of showcasing is the new Ozempic pills that are going to be coming out that make people not want to eat. Which kind of got me like me going down like a rabbit hole of the useless eaters.

Which is, I believe it was a national socialist word branding that was used for people that weren’t productive. Right. And right here it’s funny because you got the wearables that says you’re not productive. Right. Your wearables are like, you got to get to work, be productive. Yep. But the Ozempic in a sense makes people not need to eat as much. Like they don’t want to eat as much so they’re not consuming as much. And the whole technocracy is about just controlling every aspect of somebody’s life where they don’t have the free will. And if they’re a useless eater, this is where it gets creepy.

Which goes into this dark enlightenment is that they’re planning instead. It’s called a moral. I don’t want to say the word because we’re on YouTube, but a Geno, whatever. I, I guess I’ll just call it a demo side. I think that’s a safer word to use. Sure. They want to do a moral demo side where instead of getting rid of people, you’ll just plug them into the board like in the Matrix with the VR reality. So it’s, I even have that, that page in the book. But I think, think that that’s why that is getting pushed.

I’m just connecting dots. You know, maybe that’s not why. Maybe they’re gonna take that idea and be like, damn, that was a good ass idea. But I, I just thought that was kind of interesting thought. Oh, sorry, I didn’t want to. Oh no, no. Just that’s what I was thinking when I was looking at that. I have a lot to say on that. So I, I, I think you’re on target. I, I definitely think that’s an element of it. It, there’s a lot going on with the Ozempic just like with the, the Botox and all. I think it is a transhuman agenda.

So for those who aren’t familiar, Botox was actually studied in World War II as a bioweapon. And they found that if they were to aerosolize it. Yes. And they found if they were to aerosolize it, it would be the most lethal bioweapon in history. So great idea to have people injected into their face. Of course. What could possibly go wrong? And you know, it has a black box label warning on it. So people who are arguing that, you know, it’s per, perfectly fine, it’s perfectly safe. It wouldn’t be, they wouldn’t have a black box label warning on it if that were the case.

It is a multi, multi Hundreds of billions of dollar industry. And that is why they, you know, they don’t have, they don’t advertise that the you know, horrendous potential ramifications. But we do see people going blind. We do see people getting paralyzed. There are some really, really, you know, unfortunate consequences. Now some people are fortunate, you know, they, they don’t have a problem with it and it ends up being okay for them. And I hope that continues to be the case for those who have used it. But to ignore the fact that it could have these tremendous deleterious effects is, you know, I don’t think very, a very good thing for us to do.

I do think that it. A lot of this plastic surgery type thing is about, I mean if you look at it. And again I’m not, this is not a judgment. You know, some people do have great work done and you know, everybody should do what makes them feel good. But if you look at it, I mean a lot of this was advertised towards the, you know, the trans movement, right. And I said from the very beginning trans movement was all about transhumanism. We’re blurring the distinctions, right? There’s no male, female, there’s, it’s all one. It’s so we can get to that monad the monistic kind of a worldview.

But the Ozempic also has some, you know, horrendous side effects that people are seeing. Again, some people have good results and you know, people are doing something that works for them. Great. Create more power to you do what works for you. We can’t ignore that A lot of people are being devastated by these drugs. And I do think there’s a major push now when you talk about the, the food and not needing to, you know, the useless eaters, which, you’re right was a National Socialist workers, you know, narrative that is being repurposed today. This was also the Fabian socialist, right? This was Bernard Shaw, right? He, he has that very famous like, you know, fairy like way that he was talking about the useless eaters.

And he’s a Fabian socialist. And so this is kind of this idea. But what they’re doing now, I. I call it the technological immunization of the eschaton. Because they are trying to bring about a heaven on earth. They are assuming the role of God. You know, when you talk about the virtualizing humans, that is what Curtis Yarvin said, that that was the alternative. Humane, sorry the humane to, you know, the unmentionable word. But you know that he said that the humane alternative would be to virtualize humans. So we’ll just put them in this virtualized society and what are they doing? You see this everywhere.

And it’s not just the dark enlightenment. That’s why I say it’s a dialectic. You’re seeing this from both sides, from all sides. They have a different path of how they get there, but the end goal is the same. You talk about the spiritual eugenics versus the Darwinian genetics eugenics, right. I wrote a whole article on Epstein’s transhumanist conspiracy and I talk about this parallel between the evolutionary biologists and you know, I’ll just say this also. I mean, Darwin’s theory is at best a hypothesis, and yet we take it as fact. So many scientists today take this as fact and it has not been proven in the slightest.

It is very much at best a hypothesis. I wouldn’t even say it’s a theory. But we’ve got the social, social Darwinism that has come downstream from it. And then of course we got the genetics eugenic component, which a lot of these dark and Latin people are proponents of. Right. Nick Land wrote his hyper racism, which is all predicated on this genetic eugenics. Elon Musk is a huge proponent of it. You know, these kind of like super soldier, genetically bred kind of beings. And for Nick Land, it’s all moving towards technoplastic beings. But then we’ve got the spiritual eugenics, which is like downstream from the Barbara Mar Hubbard and there the idea that the selfish cannot evolve and that only the, you know, spiritually enlightened can move on.

And when I say it’s a technological immunization of the eschaton, they want to bring about heaven on earth and they want to be the architects of reality. So they arrogate themselves to this godlike status where now they create reality. But of course they can’t bring heaven on earth. Anybody who’s read the Bible knows that some of thing, you know, anybody who’s just rooted in reality knows that, you know, that this is a, A, a flawed existence. I said it’s not going to be heaven on earth. But what they do instead is they create a simulacra. This is why all of our food is not real food anymore.

We’re being constantly poisoned with all of these, the image imitation, you know, it’s orange candy versus an actual orange fruit that comes out of nature from, you know, our wonderful creator. And so, but that’s what they do with everything. Everything becomes a simulacra. And I, I think it’s going to end up in A dystopian hellscape. And. But they do believe they’re, you know, advancing us to this. This is progress. We’re going to be having our heaven on earth in this dystopian simulacra. Oh, wow. That Botox dig. It was a trip that I’m gonna have to clip that because I always like to find like the stuff that’s super relatable and mix that in.

But it is a simulacra. It’s a hyper reality that we live in. And every single thing that we’re seeing happen on the world stage is been planned out. And these plans go back a long time. Yeah. And I even brought up there’s this author I like, Robert Anton Wilson, Conspiracy, like fun kind of authority. But he was doing these comedian kind of like talks on, you know, Illuminati and he was very pissed off at how the government has gone into our bladders with you need to take a piss test. But he was like, promoting like the Timothy Leary, like, use of psychedelics, which I don’t like, subscribe to whatsoever.

But the thing is interesting with Timothy Larry, his next, like, move was going to be into cyber delics, like tripping out on. On cyber delics, which I. I thought was. Which is what Peter Thiel is doing. Right? Really? Yeah. Peter Thiel, his Prospera. So subsidiary Prospera is Vitalia, which they renamed to Infinita, but Vitalia you can still find on the Wayback Machine is talks about a death is optional. And Infinita kind of encapsulates that name. So they. But there’s a documentary, the Illegal. The. I forgot what it’s called. Like the illegal city where the billionaires illegal laws.

I don’t know, I forgot the name of the title. But it’s essentially shows where there’s a scene in there. They do a lot of these transhuman experiments and there’s a scene where they have this headset so that will make people have a trip so they can have this transcendent experience without actually taking the drug. Interesting. Yeah. So that I think is probably happening now. Maybe that could even go into a lot of the chat GPT kind of psychosis. Not saying that’s where it’s coming from. I think that would happen more so on a. On Twitter or something because there’s more colors and all that.

ChatGPT is just like words and there’s not much there. And I wanted to add one more thing. When you’re talking about like the. The food and Ozempic, you know, Going all the way back to Plato, he talked about how only the elites and the soldiers would eat meat and everybody else would, you know, eat all the other stuff because they needed to be strong and sharp. And now and then we, you know, the they, Bertrand Russell, you know, H.G. wells, they’ve all talked about this how like we’re going to have, you know, one class like caste system of society, but they talk about the food like that.

I mean we had soil and green. The movie predictive programming. Right. And operational preparation for of the environment for where we are being given. We’re told to eat the bugs, to eat the plastic and they will be eating the, the meat. And then remember there was that World Economic Forum symposium that they did and I can’t remember who said it, but they were talking about how if people don’t want to give up their meat, it’s okay, we can just, you know, have an insect, you know, like permeate and infect them with some sort of an allergy so that they can’t.

And now we have these ticks and people are developing Alpha Gal syndrome as a result of these, these tickets. Ticks. These tick bites from ticks. Yeah, I forgot what it’s called, what kind of tick it is, but yeah, the specific type of a tick. And a lot of people are developing Alpha Gal syndrome, which is where you had develop an allergy to red meat. Alpha Gal syndrome. Wow. Yeah, yeah. So I, I, I got your link down below. Everybody go, go click that link. Go subscribe to Courtney Turner. You’ll get wicked smart and get her new book.

That’s cool that Patrick worked with Sutton. Yes. Yeah, they wrote phenomenal books together. Yeah. So you got you plugged into all the right information with Sutton and I always pronounce her name wrong, but she covered the dumbing down of American school system work with Sutton also. They Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. And so that is why I’m on my wicked smart journey. And this philosophy thing is so much fun too, learning about it. I’ve been diving deep into the logo therapy of Victor Frankel, which has been incredible, like on optimism as well, sort of. I don’t know if you ever, never got into his work, but that’s been very nice.

Yeah, but the like the Heidegger thing is cool. I’m really. We’ll wrap it up. I just kind of wanted to talk for another five minutes on like what, what I’ve been researching and looking into because as a content creator we have to kind of follow our passions and excitement and that’s an individual experience is. What am I kind of following into? A lot of people get bored. You go online, for example. It’s very boring because it’s just propaganda 24 7. So if you go on Twitter and you go to recommended for you, it’s recommended for, for us because it’s gonna piss us off.

I’m like, always pissed off. But there’s a strange thing where I keep going back to it from the dopamine hits. So what? And also, it’s a collective. It’s a group collective. So with the philosophy that. Yes, yeah, so like the, the, the Eigen wealth, the unwel, the midwealth, and all the different me and all that that I’m learning about in the collective, which. The collective has always been socialist. That’s what they. Oh, that’s like what. What it. What it is. All throughout history, even Gustav Levon like, talked about that. And so learning about who am I with Heidegger as well, has been very fun.

I’ve been like, absolutely loving it. And just this idea of like, the future, how, like, I’m always thinking about, okay, what am I going to do after this? Or what am I going to do, what’s next kind of thing. Always planning for that. And then when I’m talking to other people, I could see them doing that. And it’s just like, new thought patterns. I, I don’t know, is philosophy like creating new thought patterns or something? Well, I, I think it’s an operating system, but I think when you learn and whenever you challenge yourself and you challenge your, your current operating system, that you will create new thought patterns.

You will also create new neurological pathways. Right? You’re expanding your, you’re exercising your neuroplasticity. So you’re taking in information and then hopefully you’re integrating it with, you know, what you believe, questioning what you believe. And with the data points that you see around you, you’re measuring it up against the reality that you live day in and day out. So, yeah, I’m excited for you on your philosophical journey. You know, I, when I first approached Heidegger, I was, you know, I was pretty young at the time, and I was very enamored and enchanted. I have come to have a very different perspective than I did back then.

You know, I very much see him as kind of a wizard who, much like Paco, has created kind of a control grid, a containment infrastructure. And phenomenology is, you know, like Dazan psychology is a, a containment, intellectual containment infrastructure that deracinates us from reality in Many ways. That’s not to say that everything he said is false. Right. We certainly there’s, there’s a lot of truths that very much resonate with us. Like you’re, you’re saying we’re thrown into the world. There, there’s truth in that. But does that mean that we have to be, you know, living in despair as a result of it? I don’t personally believe that.

I believe that. I don’t think that we’re wired to be these like, selfish brutes and the victims and resentful. Right. The selfish fruit concept is a Hobbesian kind of concept. That, and that’s where, you know, of course, we’ve got to be contained and restrained because that’s man’s nature, his natural state. And I don’t think that’s true at all. I think that we were given free will because we have the capacity to adjudicate morality, to adjudicate right from wrong, and that it’s incumbent upon us to do so. And that’s what our free will should be wired towards.

And I do believe that there is a reality, there’s a natural order of things, that there is a creator. We are not. That we are not. We are made in the image imago dei, so we are made in the image of creator. That’s why we are creative beings. That’s why we procreate. That’s why we are capable of ingenuity and invention. But we don’t architect reality. There is a reality outside of us and we have to deal with reality. So I think that some of these philosophies deracinate us from that. And I would like to get some sort of a restoration of true metaphysical reality and a true appreciation for the wonder that we’ve been given.

Right. Like we’ve been given this. The. There’s, you know, there’s good and bad in the world. Right. It’s not all good, but there, there’s so much to be grateful for and for us to, to recognize what is real and not to arrogate ourselves to godlike status, to be grateful for what we have been given. And yeah, so I, I go to this bookstore and I get the Ayn Rand Objectivist magazine, which is like. And I’m just learning all these new words and was going over the National Socialist and how they were subjective, where they didn’t live in reality.

It didn’t matter what reality was. It was, this is our world view, this is what we believe, and there’s nothing else. That’s it. And then there’s Objectivism, which I believe is more grounded in reality. But I could be wrong. I’m learning all these words and it’s a lot of fun. It’s a. Yeah, no, it is, it’s definitely fun and I, I’m excited for your journey. It so to some extent. But she, remember earlier I was talking about the dichotomy between the rationalists and the empiricists. So she, you know, takes. Yes, it’s a more, it’s a reality, but it’s not this hybrid, right? I, this, that term, Aristotelian term is holly morphism.

So it’s taking through the particulars we can know the universal and that there are universals. So it’s, it’s really, I think there has to be an element of faith right in the world. Because as humans we are limited. We don’t have the capacity to know everything. We are not omniscient, we’re not omnipotent. So there has to be an element of faith because otherwise we literally can’t function, we can’t proceed. Sometimes you just, you know, as the old cliche goes, you have to take the leaf of faith because otherwise we’re just going to be stymied. Right. So there is that aspect.

But that doesn’t mean that we can’t know things. We absolutely can. Right? I know that this is a microphone. I know that this is purple, you know, there. I know I am talking to you right now and I don’t need to take a big leap of faith to know that my five senses indicate that that is so. But when we integrate the two, that’s when we get this real, you know, I think the, the real path towards the, the fullest expression of being human. And I like to say thank you to Rising Love says I love the show.

Thank you both with a huge super chat. 20. Do I gotta feed the kitty couch just one more time? Because that was very kind to you. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. And if you want to support the show, go over to my Patreon. This is my capitalist coming going through free market. Go to the patreon, got a 7 day free trial which I’m gonna end this weekend. So we got like 600 people watching. All 600. You go get the free trial because I’m gonna take that off the table and go watch the new documentary up on there and also go click the link below, Go subscribe to Courtney’s YouTube channel and go grab her new book, the Final Betrayal.

A cautionary tale with Patrick Wood. How the Technocracy destroyed America. Yes, yes. And we have. So I just want to go through the options for people to buy. So we have on Patrick Wood’s website, I’m sure you have the links, but just so people who are listening can hear it, Technocracy News at the store. And this is a great place to go if you want to get more than one copy because you will get a great discount. So this is directly from Patrick Wood’s site. We also have an option at Books Buy patrickwood and this is a wonderful option for everyone.

But it is a particularly great option for those of you who might not be in the United States because you will avoid some exorbitant shipping fees and tariffs if you purchase through Books Buy Patrickwood. And then of course we are on Amazon as well. So you can get your paperback or your Kindle or book. Both. A lot of people like to do both and we encourage that as well. And this is the best place to go to leave us a five star review and tell us how much you appreciate our efforts. And you could also leave a review on Goodreads as well.

And if you want to see some more of my written material, a great way to support my work and see my writing is on Substack. I it’s at Courtenay. I spell it like Courteney. It is pronounced Courtney, but C O U R T E N A Y T U r n e r.substack.com and for my podcast, I do give all of my paid subscribers early access on Substack as well as ad free material because I don’t have control over the ads on the other platforms. But if you find the ads annoying, for a pretty small fee, I think it’s like, you know, a fancy latte once a month you can become a member and have access to that.

Well, thank you so much, Courtney. God bless you. This has been great. I appreciate you coming up on here. Everybody smash that like button. Click that link down below. It’s Donut and Courtney. Much love and God bless y’. All. God bless you and thank you. Thank you. Call me Caligula don’t made a lens I don’t need no formula Call me Caligula God on earth I don’t need no Jupiter Call me Caligula Roman flames while I feed my insula Call me Caligula Horse in the senate and gold in the urinal.
[tr:tra].