Dr Courtney Brown
Video Summary
Summary
➡ The text discusses the ongoing debates around extraterrestrial existence and UFOs. These debates are sparked by professionals, like university professors, who consider alien abductions and extraterrestrial experiments real. There's also discussion about a potential cover-up conspiracy by government and media parties. The text also mentions UFO sightings documented by Farsight Institute, and their efforts to wake up the public to such experiences. A recommendation for using Noble Gold Investments for financial stability is noted. Lastly, the conversation touches on discrediting tactics targeting whistleblowers revealing details about extraterrestrial encounters.
➡ The text discloses concerns with the Pentagon's interactions with veterans from Afghanistan, particularly those suffering from PTSD. There is criticism regarding neglect of their reports on unidentified aerial phenomena and extraterrestrial activities, which link with allegations of a widespread human trafficking operation. Additionally, it highlights the support of academics for UFO abduction phenomena, suggesting that these act as a cover-up for problematic actions by extraterrestrial entities. The challenge posed is in breaking through the methods of control which have, seemingly, been perfected over millions of years. The key to this might lie in further study of UFOs, their cloaking abilities and the strategies they use to manipulate human behavior.
➡ The text discusses the challenges faced by those wanting to disclose extraterrestrial truths, highlighting public distrust and controlled opposition as major issues. It explains how the extensive work of the Farsight organization, via remote viewing exercises, has gathered compelling evidence of extraterrestrial existences – though admitted hurdles include unrealistic public demands and a lack of physical visual sighting of extraterrestrial beings.
➡ The speaker discusses about communicating with extraterrestrials and the difficulty in convincing others about UFOs and alien existence, especially as most people lack the training to understand such phenomena. They mention using modified cameras to spot UFOs and argue that accepting the mental aspect of extraterrestrial communication is the biggest hurdle. The speaker also dismisses assumed concepts of 'ascension' and dimensional existence, labeling them as manipulative propaganda. They introduce the term 'ISBE', standing for 'Immortal Spiritual Being', and argue that while these ISBEs can be tricked or enslaved, they cannot be killed. The conversation transitions to discussing media bias, citing partisan representations in outlets like Fox News and CNN. Alternative, objective outlets such as The Hill and Breaking Points, particularly on platforms like YouTube, are proposed as alternative news sources.
➡ The text discusses the role of alternate news outlets like The Hill and Breaking Points, which cover underrepresented topics but struggle to break through due to media control. Despite having a professional and appealing setup, these outlets are unable to compete with mainstream entertainment channels in terms of viewership. The text suggests that nonsensical and superficial content tends to dominate the media landscape, overshadowing serious and substantial content. The Chinese model of TikTok is highlighted for its educational approach. The speaker suggests that although these outlets contribute valuable content, media control makes it difficult for them to gain visibility.
➡ The speaker discusses the complicated issue of unverifiable personal experiences involving entities and phenomena such as UFOs and Bigfoot, lamenting a lack of coherency due to a mixture of misinformation. He mentions an upcoming project named "Secret Space Program" and alleges the existence of real extraterrestrial spacecraft in the possession of the US government, suggesting that these have been reverse-engineered through a black budget component of military spending and help from extraterrestrials. However, he claims this won't be publicly revealed due to military strategy and secrecy.
➡ Despite speculation, the advanced technology seen in some conflicts won't be seen in Ukraine or in conjunction with the Blue Angels; furthermore, the existence of extraterrestrial tech is still in question. Additionally, note the upcoming pivot to Patreon for exclusive, ad-free, uncensored content discussing previously untouched topics.
Video Transcription
Summary
Video TranscriptionI like looking at the work of David M. Jacobs and John Mack in this field because they're also professors like me. And so I sort of like reading their stuff, and I like looking at their stuff because it's so well documented. Here we have two professors talking about the abduction phenomenon as a real thing. And during the disclosure stuff that you have going on in Congress, no one's talking about what the ETS are doing, but you have professors talking about this.
And then you have the former head of the Israeli space Directorate saying these experiments are going on and that there are written agreements between the US. Government and the extraterrestrials. No one's bringing that up. This stuff is so extremely well orchestrated. The issue that I have been sort of wrestling with, and we can segue into some of the new results that we have for some of the new projects we have coming out.
The question is, how do you save humanity? How do you save the planet? Anybody else a little bit stressed out about finances right now? Yeah, join the club. You're not the only one. Noble Gold Investments can help you with that. Actually, let me read to you a couple of testimonials directly from people that Noble Gold Investments has helped. Here's the first one. The Noble crew walked me through everything.
No stress. Exclamation point. Here's another one. With their help, I can finally sleep easy at night. And now this month, noble Gold Investments is handing out free five ounce silver. America the beautiful coins. These are wonderful collector coins. I actually have a couple of these. And find out how you qualify, click the link specific just for Leak Project listeners. Go to leakprojectgold. com. Give them a call. 1877-646-5347.
They have an a plus rating with the Better Business Bureau countless five star reviews. Nopel. Gold Investments is the gold company that I trust. Ladies and gentlemen, Rex Spare. Leak Project. How the heck are you? Hey, will you look at who it is? Dr. Courtney Brown. How cool is that? So after a pretty decent hiatus away from the video and these incredible podcasts and information streams, dr. Courtney Brown is back.
We've had a couple of great interviews the past several months, and today we're going to talk about the latest information on full disclosure. Also, the grays. What are they really? There's so many conflicting stories. I've heard just about everything. Dr. Brown, great to see you. Just want to say it's great to be here. Wanted everybody to go to Farsightinstitute. org. And for the major projects, full videos, the latest and greatest.
Check out farsightprime. com. What is going on? Last time you came on the show, you had an incredible camera that was picking up, I think, 120 frames per second. You had it retrofitted, and you were showing these just incredible anomalies in the sky. And since then, I know you've been up to a lot. So let's talk about it. Yeah. Rex there's only one way to tell people really what's going on in the world, and that is through a gradual element of take a look at this and take a look at that, and take a look at that and take a look at that.
So what I wanted to really emphasize is something that's on my mind constantly these days, especially this month and last month. It's just becoming big in my head is the way to convince the whole world that this is real, that the whole extraterrestrial thing is real, but not just with regard to what the mainstream media is debating with. Are we alone in the universe? That's such a stupid question.
The question is, what are the extraterrestrials doing? No one's asking that. They're all questioning do they exist or do the UFOs exist? Do the UAPs exist? Do the extraterrestrials? But no one's talking about what they're doing. So the real problem I'm getting to is how do you actually wake up an entire public? So we have a gradual number of things that we're trying to do, because you can't just throw the kitchen sink at people.
You have to sort of lead them into something. And the first element is people always have their phones. So we have started, starting this year, to video record UFOs UAPs and put them up on my Instagram page. Courtney brown farsight. That's free. And if you sort of are really skeptical, you always have your phone. You just go instagram? Courtney Brown Farsight and there's a whole bunch of videos.
Now there are a lot of people putting up UFO videos on the web, on Instagram, on Facebook. There's all types of people doing that. But I do not think there's anyone giving methods for how to do this and then showing repeatedly how we get these videos of UFOs every single time we go out. Meaning if someone has a UFO video or a picture, it's a one off. It's the one thing they do in their whole life, and that's just it.
And then they post it on Instagram or YouTube or whatever. And then given the fact there's over 7 billion people on the planet, almost 8 billion people over time, there's a lot of UFO videos, but each one is a one off for each person. I believe we're the only group that are repeatedly showing one after the next at the next. So it's not that we have one video.
We have literally, at this point, hundreds of videos. And we're actually, in terms of UAPs, we've probably got five or 600 actual UAPs on our videos. And in terms of the ones on Instagram, those are just random selections of the stuff that we've been seeing as astounding as they are. And many people have said that the videos that we have up on Instagram of these UFOs are like the best that exists out there.
They're way better than anything that you get released by the military. Military has really perfect resolution, excellent videos, but the ones that release are really crappy. So the issue is, I think we're the largest or maybe the only venue where you can get a whole bunch of videos taken by the same people over and over, over. Go again with the methods for how we do it. Clearly explained so it can be replicated.
That's point number one. So that's sort of entryway number one. Yet I don't see anybody in Congress talking about what we're doing. I do see people at UFO conferences now, odly saying things like, don't look at the sky. Getting UFOs is so rare, it's so unusual, you can't do it. Don't even try. They're talking down the effort, which I think those people are probably plants that are antidisclosure people that are being set up to say this in order to discourage people.
Because once we actually showed how it can be done repeatedly, regularly, all the time, and any ten minute section segment that you video record using the methods and the cameras and so on, and the editing methods that we use, you get them. I think the establishment is sort of pushing back, and they have people that they have planted everywhere. The agencies, we'll just call them the agencies have people that they can call on in every major news organization.
They definitely have people in every major UFO group that'll go up and say the party lied to steer people away from the fact that the UFOs are out there all over the place. So we have that. It's not just that there's a disclosure movement, but the active intent to stop disclosure is extremely active. There's so much going on. All the mainstream news has been put into a sandbox.
Whenever you get into the UFO groups, you have people coming out, directing people in the wrong direction. It's extremely well organized and it's seemingly seamless. The people that go up in the UFO conferences that say things like, don't look for UFOs, don't look to the sky. It's a rare thing. They look like they have the right credentials. They look sort of new agey. They sound hip, they sound sort of but people who have been doing this know how to dress people up to look like that.
They're not going to send somebody that looks like an IBM executive into a UFO conference and tell people, don't look in the skies. They're going to get someone who looks apart and sounds part and has the right credentials. And you won't ever know their background, where their money sources are coming from, what connections they have. You won't get that. And then when you get the hearings that are going on in Congress, like with David Grush and other whistleblowers, right after that, you get people coming out and discrediting David Grush.
And when David Grush, he was never the main thing anyway. He was the people that he talked with that are the main thing. Those are the people that actually gave the information. He was just relaying that he had talked to a certain number of people. So when you try to discredit David Grush, as has been done with regard to his PTSD after serving in Afghanistan and subsequent alcoholism, it's distracting everybody from the real question is, he still has his security clearance, he still works in the UF in the Pentagon.
The issue is, who did he talk with anyway? People who are comrade veterans that came back from Afghanistan. Lots of them have histories of PTSD after they come back from that. So that was sort of a classic. Distract people away from by discrediting or trying to discredit david grush, they're distracting people away from the real thing, which is who he's been talking with and is reporting on that's.
40 or 50 people who have actually worked hands on with the UAPs or UFOs and the people that are on them. So there's that. And then there's the issue of people who have actually said things that corroborate the stuff that we're doing. So A, we have repeated videos. It's not one video like the so called tic TAC video that the military released that everyone in the military keeps I mean, everyone in the media keeps showing.
We have repeated videos, and we show people how to do it themselves. So that's step number one. Step number two is, what are the AETS actually doing? So once you get to the question of that they exist, then the next question is, what are they doing? And that's what's motivating the real antidisclosure movement. The government has a real serious problem. They have written agreements with the extraterrestrials to conduct so called experiments.
And these experiments are not experiments at all. Actually, that's just a word to sort of make it sound scientifically and things like that. The reality is they're involved in a huge human trafficking operation, and that's what they're trying to cover up. Now, let's look at a couple of things. We have done remote viewing studies on over 75 major projects involving the UFOs, plus we have and the methodologies and the quality of our stuff is unequaled anywhere.
Now, in addition to that, look at a couple of other things that have been done by other people that corroborate what we're talking about. Chaim Ashed. H-A-I-M Ashed. He was the former head of the Israeli Space Directorate. That's their version of NASA, israel's version of NASA for 30 years. He's also a very decorated retired general. He's general, and he's still considered General Ashed, and he's now also a professor.
Hayemashed has said in a written interview, in an interview that appeared in an Israeli newspaper, he's never backed away from it. Is that the extraterrestrials exist. They're here, they're conducting experiments, and the United States government and perhaps some other governments have written agreements that allow them to do this. He doesn't go into what these experiments are. But nonetheless, he has verified this is the former head of the Israeli Space Directorate for 30 years.
He has verified, in fact, that the extraterrestrials are real. They're here, and they're doing experiments. Secondly, you have academics who have studied this so called abduction phenomenon. Now, one is John Mack, the late John Mack, who is the Harvard professor, founder of his department of psychiatry at Harvard Hospital. But you also have David M. Jacobs, who is the he's now retired professor of history. And he wrote a bunch of books.
But this is a recent book of his, which is Walking Among US. Walking among us. The alien plan to control humanity. Using that as a start off point. But it's similar to what John Mack's book goes into the reality of the abduction phenomenon, where extraterrestrials abduct people in the middle of the night, typically, and then do stuff to them, experiments on their body, implanting fetuses, taking fetuses out, in and out in terms of genetic experiments that are going on.
And if you look at those two guys, those are academics. And they have actually done a huge number of interviews with people, often under hypnosis, but eventually, even without hypnosis, to have people explain their memories of these abduction experiences. So there's another guy called Bob Lazar. Now, most people in the UFO community know about Bob Lazar, but one of the interviews that he mentioned about, he was someone who worked in Area 51, and he has talked about people involved in the beings ETS involved in the abduction phenomenon.
And he has said that they have the ability to essentially anesthesize someone and then do these biological, these experiments, these things on them, sort of their version of going to the operating room and putting you asleep, but they have a mental ability to do that. But one of the things that Bob Lazar has talked about that's interesting is that they do this all mentally telepathically. They have a way to anesthesize someone from mind to mind control.
However, that ability to do that degrades becomes almost impossible to do if the person is under any level of stimulus, for example, amphetamines coffee or an emotionally agitated state, people are harder to do. You can't do that easily with them, which largely explains why the abduction phenomena happens at night when people are asleep. And it also explains why it's easy to bring the memories back. They're essentially given a hypnotic suggestion during the abduction phenomena to forget, to not remember this.
And that's why when people are under hypnosis, they can bring these memories back of what happened to them when they were on the ships. So what I'm pointing out is that these are two professors, david M. Jacobs and John Mack, in major universities. I'm a professor in a major university as well, but I don't do any of this stuff that I'm talking about. Now, at my university there, I teach math and stats in a department of in a social science program, a social science department.
But nonetheless, I like looking at the work of David M. Jacobs and John Mack in this field because they're also professors like me. And so I sort of like reading their stuff and I like looking at their stuff because it's so well documented. So here we have two professors talking about the abduction phenomenon as a real thing. And during the disclosure stuff that you have going on in Congress, no one's talking about what the ETS are doing, but you have professors talking about this.
And then you have the former head of the Israeli Space Directorate saying these experiments are going on and there are written agreements between the US government and the extraterrestrials. No one's bringing that up in these disclosure things. It's like the stuff is so extremely well orchestrated. So the issue that I have been sort of wrestling with and we can segue into some of the new results that we have for some of the new projects we have coming out, but the question is, how do you save humanity? How do you save the planet? And now you're involved with this heavily, Rex, because you've been running this show of yours for a very long time, and you're actually involved in trying to wake people up and change people's minds and get the information out on all types of things.
You've had lots of people on your shows talking about things. But we're still in a situation of denial where the disclosure is very fringy. Even the stuff that goes on in Congress, it's very fringy. And even when something comes out like how to take videos of UFOs reliably, you get people showing up at UFO conferences saying, don't try to do that. Don't look in the skies. How do you actually break through with that, given the level of control? Now, this is the thing I want to bring to your attention.
Who's ever doing it? On the extraterrestrial side, our projects clearly indicate at farsight that this has been going on for thousands of years. Who's ever doing this on this antidisclosure process, on the Et side, on the extraterrestrial side, has had millions of years to fine tune how to control a population. So who's ever doing this isn't doing this. For the first time, they really know how to massage a population, how to channel all of the different media outlets in a certain way, how to get the political people to act in a certain way, how to get the information that's gotten to the public to be muted in a certain way.
They've got millions of years, not tens of thousands, and not just like ten years, 30 years. They've got a huge amount of time to perfect this. And then there's people like you and me who are trying to go against that, who are trying to break the planet out of the spell that they have that keeps him imprisoned and we're going up against a group that has had millions of years to fine tune, to perfect the process of containing the information.
And that is a real serious issue. You have Haim Ashed mentioning stuff like that. You have academics. John Mack. David M. Jacobs. How do you break through? And then we have on our side showing absolutely verifiable evidence of this whole thing being real. Not only showing you UFO videos, but also saying the only way we can get those UFO videos is by doing certain techniques, photographic techniques that clearly demonstrate that the UFOs are trying to hide themselves, that they are behind the whole process of stopping the disclosure.
They could easily slow down, fly slower and turn off the cloaking stuff that would allow us to take pictures, invisible light rather than infrared. They don't do that. They obviously want to keep this a hidden thing. By the way, Chaim Bassett has also mentioned that the ETS have specifically said in the agreements that they do not want anything dealing with them to go public. That's part of the agreements that the US must keep everything hidden, keep everything secret.
So it's part of the written agreements that the US has bought into. So given that type of a background, you have to just I have lots to say that will give you hope and inspiration. But to start out with, you have to say, are we just spinning our wheels? Are we just twiddling our thumbs? You and I, despite the fact that we have a major website, we have a YouTube channel that's quite successful, and we have our own streaming service that gives all of our projects, public projects, all of this stuff.
Plus we have multiple venues that we use to show the UFO videos. You have academics talking about the reality of this stuff. You get former head of the Israeli Space Directorate mentioning, are we just spinning our wheels? Because no matter what we do with all of this stuff, it doesn't seem to be enough. Let me pause. Well, let me jump in on that because the problem is, for so many years they have given us the opposite stories.
So people get to the point when they do start to do drip disclosure, they're like, okay, what's the agenda here? So that's one problem. The second problem is, like you said, there's what appears to be much controlled opposition out there that wants to control the narrative. And in doing so, they're like, oh, don't look up at the skies is one thing. And then there's other people out there that are the exact opposite, right? They come back and they're like, yes, I met a Gray that was married to a Nordic and it came back to me with Bigfoot, and it was the most amazing experience I ever had.
I just can't believe and then you've got people that try and be serious and make all these claims, and they take it all the way back to the Anunnaki, and you actually listen to what they're saying, and you can tell that they're just reading from a script whether or not they made it up or somebody told them to make it up. But I'll tell you what, I have been doing this long enough now to see that many of the people that at one point I looked up to, I'm looking at now, like, are you guys intentionally stuck or are you just not willing to see more than what you know? Because there's a lot of disinformation out there, right? So that's one of the problems, is now that we can show technical evidence.
And then, for example, the doctor from Israel, the head of the Space Force, Haima Shed, when that guy came out and brought up the people on Mars or the beans on Mars that weren't ready to make disclosure yet, I thought to myself, yep, he's legit. But then the problem is people are going to come out and they're going to say, oh, because he's a part of the program, he's disinformation.
And then that recent disclosure in Washington where they know the huge disclosure movement there, one of the guys there was wearing a pin that looked like the United Nations Global Agenda Summit pin, like the WEF pin. And I'm like, oh, really? So what are your thoughts on that? It's almost impossible to point to any one agency or person as being responsible for the antidisclosure movement. It's so widespread and so multifaceted.
But over this last month, it really has sunk into me. Believe it or not, even though I've been doing this for like decades, it's really sunk into me. We're up against a group, an extraterrestrial group that has literally had millions of years that's not an overstatement. They've literally had millions of years to finesse, how to control a population, and they know how to do this, and they're doing it extremely well.
And if we do not have some extra element, it would be impossible for us to break through. There's only so much that we can do. We can amass information. We can show that. I'm an academic, so I like to, in a figurative sense, give footnotes. I like to say where the information is coming from and to compile it and to build a case, like a legal case. So bringing up Haya Mashed, bringing up David M.
Jacobs, bringing up John Mack, these are all parts of the evidence that is accumulating to do this. And then when we have our own studies with remote viewing, as well as the photography, video stuff that sort of adds to that body of in, the people who are anti disclosure will always look, well, this a lot of the information that Farsight does with Courtney Brown, that's just remote viewing.
So how do you know that's real or anything like that? But one of the things that's consistent with everybody who does any deep work with the UFOs extraterrestrial thing is that the extraterrestrials do everything mentally. They fly their ships mentally, they communicate mentally. They may have words that they use verbally, but that's not their primary means of communication. Their primary means of normal communication is mental, like telepathy type of stuff.
For them, the stuff that we do at Farsight is normal. And in addition, the issue of being invisible is an issue to a lot of people. They want to be able to see the UFOs. Now, we've been showing videos of the UFOs, but people often say, no, that's not enough. I want them to be in your backyard and a close up, and I want to see through the window and I want to see the alien looking through that window out.
That's what I want. And you sort of know that's that's a little bit of a stretch. We don't have those types of videos, but we have otherwise very convincing videos of them flying over our house, over our houses, and over the beach and over the Pensacola Naval Air Station, over Africa. And so we have videos of the ships flying right over no, I want to see the window and I want to see the alien.
So there's sort of that level of problems. And there's also the issue of not being able to see the extraterrestrials always physically when they're right in front of you. Now, one of the things that's interesting on our remote viewing side is when we do remote viewing, most, like 98% of extraterrestrials that we run into using our remote viewers and our remote viewers are the best on the planet.
They go through a year of full time training before they even start anything. They always work under total blind, very defendable, scientifically defendable conditions, always totally blind. And they do paper sessions. They're actually on iPads as well as video sessions at the very end where they present their information all totally blind. And then they corroborate each other. So we have four or five remote viewers doing a project and they don't communicate with each other, they don't know each other's work, and they all come in with the same stuff.
That by itself is very convincing. But when we do these remote viewings and the remote viewers end up in front of an extraterrestrial, like in front of a gray or reptilian or just a humanoid that looks like you and me, they can see us. They actually see us. Now, you might think of it like a ghost image or whatever, but the extraterrestrials stare right at us and say they're there.
And if you were there with the extraterrestrial looking at us, you wouldn't see us. Like if you were standing next to the extraterrestrial and we were remote viewing, that extraterrestrial, the extraterrestrial can see us remote viewing, we actually show up. But if you were there standing next to the extraterrestrial, you'd ask the extraterrestrial, what are you looking at? I don't see anything. So the issue is that when you're just using your eyes, the Ocular image is coming through, you don't see anything.
But with the larger senses, the mental senses, you can perceive and see clothing and everything, the beings that are there. So what I'm actually pointing out here is that this is quite a common phenomenon that is discussed in some of the books that I just mentioned, david M. Jacobs and John Mack, the mental nature of the UFO phenomenon. And it's very common in all of our projects. But the interesting thing is it shouldn't then be too much of a surprise that our group of remote viewers who have been trained so extensively and have had so much experience going back many years of experience it should.
Not be a surprise to you that we have developed the same capabilities as the extraterrestrials that we're remote viewing, so that when we interact with the extraterrestrials, we can see them. Like if they're next to us, we can see them, we can have a conversation with them, we can communicate in the same way that the extraterrestrials can communicate with us when we pop up and we show up in a ship and we're standing in front of them so that they can communicate with us.
Now, similarly, if I'm on the beach, for example, and I'm having a communication with Harvey, that's one of the shows that we have@farsightprime. com that's exactly the same type of mean. I can see them, but others may not be able to see them. So the issue with that confronts humanity is they don't have the extensive training that we have had, so they don't understand how could you see something that you can't see? So there is sort of that level of confusion.
And the real question is, how do you get to be able to convince people that the UFOs are real, that the extraterrestrials real, that we interact with them, that that's all real when you don't actually always see them. The only thing we've been able to crack so far is to be able to see them using modified cameras that evade their stealth tech, to be able to see them flying right over our house at low altitudes, below the cloud level right there.
But the other aspect of trying to get people to buy into the mental whole component of the extraterrestrial phenomenon is absolutely huge. And how do you actually get them to understand that when they've never experienced it, when they don't remember anything, experiencing it themselves? So it's a huge thing for us to do. All this blocking has a reason for it, but it's part of the game of controlling a population.
There's a reason why people have trouble seeing these things. It's not normal in the galaxy anyway. I should pause here, but I have more to say about this. But I wanted to pause. I don't want to keep on going. I could keep on. Talking another two. Oh, well, no, this is great. And I'll keep listening for 2 hours. I appreciate I'm also I'm taking notes as you're talking and I remember talking to Dr.
Jacobs maybe five, six years ago, and one of the things I asked him was I was like, where are these things from? And he said, if I remember it correctly, may not be pervaded or whatever, but he said it doesn't matter. And I think it does matter personally, but it seems to me like oftentimes I wonder are they from even a different dimension, maybe? Are they from the fourth dimension somehow and they can kind of pop into this third dimension, or are they really from Zeta Reticuli? I'm having a tough time buying that Zeta Reticuli story.
And that was David Jacobs that said that to you, is that right? Well, no, it was Betty and Barney Hill said anything about he didn't know where they're from. He doesn't know where they're from is what I remember. Well, there's an issue when people talk about from another dimension. Unfortunately, there's been a lot of pollution of the entire field coming from the channeling community. And they talk about other dimensions, other realities, and they talk about it also in terms of ascension, that humanity is almost ready to graduate and become brothers and sisters and be embraced by their brothers and sisters in the galaxy that are warm and fuzzy and ready to welcome them and all that stuff.
All of that is manipulative garbage coming out from a fascist based extraterrestrial thing. You have to understand that these beings have had millions of years to fine tune this. There is no possible way they would not take advantage of the channeling community direct input. You're talking about replicating a thousand Tokyo Rose type people, meaning people that, except worse, tokyo Rose at least knew she was lying during World War II to the American soldiers that they were broadcasting out to.
The channeling community is even worse because these are some of the very best human beings that exist on the planet. They're really good, honest, trustworthy people. They have really the best intent, and they really are trying to make a big effort to help humanity. They come across as incredibly truthful because they are these fascist extraterrestrial groups look at that and say, that's perfect. That's the venue that we want to shovel or shut it out into.
So they push this stuff out through the channeling community about you're going to go through the ascension, you're going through the level three, you're going to the fourth level, then you're going to able to go to the fifth level, and so on like that. All of which is total garbage. There is no levels like that. There is no ascension process. The ascension process is part of the propaganda that makes you think that there's an end to the evolution.
All we have to do is get better. And that also feeds into the propaganda for encouraging people to recycle, to come back, to reincarnate, to come back and have life after life after life eternally, to improve so they can eventually move up to the higher levels of existence. But all of that is garbage. None of that is real. We don't call ourselves souls or spirits because that comes with all that pollution of religious control stuff.
So we call everybody an ISBE. Everyone Is for the purpose of being. And we live inside, we animate these physical bodies and it's impossible. We have found out it is impossible, literally impossible. No one apparently in the entire universe has figured out how to kill an Isbee. So it's not possible to kill somebody. You can kill the physical body, but the consciousness, the awareness, the actual person is still there, alive and well, alive and kicking.
However, you can trick an Isbee. You can deceive an ISBE, you can capture, you can enslave, you can do all types of bad things to an ISBE, but you cannot kill an Isbee. So what you get is this extremely extensive process to trick an ISBE. And the whole Isbee that we're talking now about everyone on the planet to trick these isbees into having their own sort of belief system that they believe in so fervently that they won't give it up.
And then you and I come in with the idea that, hey, these extraterrestrials are real and they're doing bad shit and you need to actually do something that will actually wake up in order to break out of the prison. And you're going up against a mind control effort that has millions of years of practice and thousands of years on the planet Earth to finesse, to fine tune. And it's really challenging.
I actually would like for a second, if you want, I'd like to segue into some political stuff. I'm not talking partisan things now, but some political things that sort of give you an evidence for sort of the basic problem when you have such a highly controlled media stuff and it affects us as well as everybody else, but you can see it in the political realm. Let's talk about yeah, okay.
So now this is not critical and it's not partisan. Meaning I'm not siding with any one side or anyone group, but in basic terms, you can clearly say that Fox News has become a major outlet for the Republican Party, Trump and things like that. And they basically are the spokesperson, the media spokesperson. It's not an objective thing. They're not an open and objective news outlet. They really have that very clear partisan point of view and their own way of promoting that.
On the other side of things, you can clearly see that CNN, for example, some people also talk about MSNBC, but let's just take about CNN. They're the same with Biden and the Democratic side in terms of promoting that side. So they always vilify the right wing. And then on the Fox News side, they always vilify the left wing and so like that they're very dependable news outlets to represent their side.
Well, then you can say, okay, well, are there any objective news outlets out there that actually try to show things sort of the way things used to be, like 20 or 30 years ago, where you could actually get objective news outlets that were really trying to be nonpartisan and so on? Well, there's a couple, for example, that I have sort of found they have an issue of money.
How do you have enough money to be an outlet? So becoming a printed news outlet like The New York Times, that's really not accessible to a alternate news source. So you're really talking about an electronic dissemination similar to the way CNN and CNN and Fox News go. And then you're talking about what would be their best venue in terms of eyeballs. You're probably talking about YouTube being the only real place they can do that.
So two interesting people, two interesting groups are The Hill and Breaking Points. Now, if you allow me to share my screen, I can just give you an idea. All right? Yeah. Okay, here's, for example, the hill now the Hill is a news outlet. They are alternate news outlet, but they try to be as objective as possible. They're really bending over backwards to show both the Republican and the Democratic side of things and so on.
And they have lots of videos that they put out every day they have and their stories every day they have like ten videos that they put out and their stories covered the whole gamut of everything. And they actually make a huge effort to cover things that are not being covered by the main chain. For example, on the Democratic side, robert F. Kennedy, Jr. And Mariana Williamson are never mentioned at all on CNN.
Period. Yet they're both campaigning for the presidency and the Democratic primaries. And you can sort of say what? Because if you look at CNN, for example, they only have Biden and they don't mention at all that there is any competition whatsoever on the Democratic side. And so you do get people like at The Hill talking about them and interviewing the Robert F. Kennedy. Interestingly, Fox News is actually and Tucker Carlson has actually given Robert F.
Kennedy a considerable amount of coverage interviewing and stuff like so and then you look at the view counts. That what they have. And if you look at the view counts for the videos, I'll click on here, just the videos so I don't get their highlighted ones, just view counts that they have. And you get views 10,000, 7000, 8000, 12,000. And then I'll scroll further down 2000, 8000, 10,000.
And a few of them are big, like here's one at 845,000 about Rand Paul doing something. But most of them are in the ten to 20 ish actually five to 20 ish realm, which is not a lot, but it's a very professional news outlet and sense that they really make a big effort. It looks great, they have the best equipment, they're trying to be objective. Now there's another group called Breaking Points.
Those are two other people that dominate that but they all have other people working. Oh by the way, I should say that the Hill has 1. 73 million subscribers but their videos don't get more than a few thousand watches. Then if you look at Breaking Points, these people, I believe, used to work at The Hill then they offered something else. But they have their own YouTube station now, Breaking Points, and I think they're still collaborative and they're friends with the of but it's a similar type of thing as to hill and they put up fewer videos but still every day there's videos but some of their videos are a little bit have greater view counts.
They have fewer subscribers, they have only a million subscribers. So here you get some 10,000 but you get a few more that get into the 58, 7150 thousand, things like that. But still you're still getting a lot in the so you're still not getting a lot of views. So I'm stopping the sharing now just to give those as two. So what you basically have is two alternate news outlets that are very polished, as polished as anything you'll get on CNN or Fox.
And they're trying to be sort of objective. And they're successful in the sense that they are still doing it, but they're not breaking through. They're not getting to the millions. They're nowhere close to PewDiePie in terms of views. And then if you look at the stuff that our YouTube channel farsight on YouTube we have 76,000 subscribers something in that neighborhood but our views typically are from 6000 to 25 30,000 in that realm.
We have a few that are a few hundred thousand but it's sort of in that same realm. What I'm basically pointing out is since the media is so heavily controlled, even when you put out a good product, even when you do something really great, you don't get visibility. I can look also at your stuff Rex, you put out a really good show. I mean, you put out stuff that is not covered in the mainstream and you have really interesting stuff.
I'm glad to be on your show because your show is really a good show. You put out interesting stuff. But I can also say you don't compete either with PewDiePie or Michelle FAM on makeup tutorials or CNN or Know. So and the real question is, given the amazing level of control that is exerted over the media, where the only things that really get through are sort of ridiculous things and PewDiePie is sort of on the ridiculous thing being wild and crazy antics but also superficial things.
Michelle FAM, for example, they both have really nice YouTube channels, I'm not criticizing them, but makeup tutorials, things that are not really essential. And then if you look at Instagram, 98% of Instagram is soft porn, meaning people trying to look good, fancy skimpy clothing and then dancing. And then TikTok is really people just jumping around and making dancing stuff, but nothing really serious. I should make the point, however, that in China, their version of TikTok is very different than our version of TikTok, and they don't allow all that stuff.
Their version of TikTok is all educational, which is interesting. The Chinese are basically we're not going to dumb down our kids, so they don't allow that anyway. But that's one of the problems that we're facing, that you can see this level of media control, not just affecting UFO and disclosure extraterrestrial stuff, but it seeps into all avenues of information distribution. So that even when people have a very good product, as example by The Hill and Breaking Points, it's hard for them to break through, it's hard for them to get the video coverage.
And when you have a great product like yourself, you do a great job. And it's important for the record. But you're not at the level of Michelle FAM or, you know, people that are doing antics of jumping around on Mean. They literally have millions of subscribers and stuff like that. So things that are ridiculous are allowed. The official dumb will allow that and they'll promote it. If you were jumping around half naked in TikTok, you'd probably have a few million subscribers, but they would allow that.
But for you to actually talk about the real extraterrestrial presence and the control that it has over our information sources, you can do that. They don't want to make it look like it's censorship. They finesse it. After millions of years, they know how to finesse this. They make it look by controlling the media access, they make it look like people are just not interested in it. But they control it in a very interesting way.
And when they do think something that is okay, that's harmless, like people jumping around half naked on Instagram, they will promote that. They will let that happen. Or on TikTok, they will let that happen. So it says, we have a free society. Look, there's a million people jumping around half naked on TikTok. How can you say we don't have a free society? Just that's right. So they give evidence of the reverse.
But the reality is the level of sophistication of the control is so extraordinarily well done. The propaganda effort is way better than what the Nazis did during the Weimar, during the Nazi period, during World War II, they had extreme control of the information. And whatever you're seeing now with the extraterrestrials is many, many thousands of times better, more fine tuned, more carefully crafted than what the Nazis did.
That level of control with the Nazis, it looked blunt, it looked brutal, it looked crude, but it was effective. This is not blunt, brutal, crude, but it's way more effective because it's so subtle you hardly see it. The main regular website has a ton of information and some access to a lot of our free projects is Farsight. org. Org. Because the Farsight Institute is a nonprofit, all of our major projects.
So that's like going to Disney's website and finding out everything that Disney's doing, you can find out there. But if you actually want to see all of the major shows that Disney comes out with, or Paramount Plus or Hulu or whatever, you have to go to their streaming service. And our streaming service is Farsightprime. com. So it's Farsight. org is our website, which that's a good place to get started.
All of our projects are nicely organized there. And then you have Farsightprime. com, which is a streaming service where we come out with all of our major projects. And so the project that's coming out in a week, secret space program, and the project that's coming out in five weeks, next month in October, middle of October, is on the Graze that'll all appear on Farsightprime. com. We have a new major project that comes out every single know.
And as well we have a news program called Et news, which is literally the news of what the extraterrestrials are up to, what they're doing. And we have about five major programs a month that come out. So people really get their money's worth and there's no other venues that show remote viewing stuff and full major projects. It's interesting because when you brought up how they've been doing this for millions of years, I've questioned that before.
I remember even 2030 years ago, I was thinking like planet killers, planet destroyers. The way that the whole economy is established, it seems like they know of these cyclical timelines and they milk these planets and these people and these civilizations as long as they can because they know when the reset is going to happen. And when I say reset, I mean I'm talking about like a global cataclysm or something that would literally take people back into the caves if they had to hide into the caves.
So, I mean, I'm really questioning these grays, though. And let me tell you, I've got friends and family that have been like I can't say one guy's name in particular, but he's got a very high level position and he's done a lot of top secret work. And he's talking about stuff off air where these things will come into his room and they will almost appear and then disappear, like Star Trek kind of stuff.
And it freaks him out. But he did tell me one time, he said they're absolutely physical. He says you can grab them. So it sounds to me like he actually grabbed one one time when it was trying to mess with him. But what are they? Because there's so many different stories. I've heard everything practically yeah, the issue is the issue is more complicated because there are so many different people with different levels of experience that you mentioned it in the beginning of the show that come at it from all different directions.
Bigfoot, whether they had experience looking at something they thought was bigfoot, or I was talking to some I was out doing UFO photography at a campsite, a national park a while back and people came over. This old guy came over, big beer belly. And he came over and sort of asked me what's going on and I sort of well, I said I had discussed what I'm doing and then he said, that's very interesting.
He went back and he had breakfast with his wife and so on. Then he came up to me afterwards and he you know, I just wanted to tell you I don't know if you want to tell me about this, but I just wanted to let you know that I bought a farm in Iowa just a little while back and I done seen Bigfoot. I'd done seen bigfoot. It was behind a tree when I was out there and I saw it behind a tree and it was staring at me and I was staring at it.
So you mentioned the stuff that you do with regard to UFOs and stuff like that, and immediately they associate it with something that's out on left field that they once saw or something like that. There's no coherency to it. There's no full body of information that people sort of put it in the context of. They have been exposed to so much disinformation that they don't know how to put your stuff in with everything else.
So they associate it with how they saw Bigfoot or how they were swimming and saw a ghostly image under the water one time, or how they were looking at the sky and they saw what looked like an angel come passing through them, or they woke up in the morning. They just come up with these stories about everything that you ever hear in the new age community because there's no coherency.
And the controlling powers want that exactly that's exactly what they want. They want everyone to be fragmented, everyone to be taking their own experiences and just sort of throwing it into the kitchen sink and making it look like a total mishmash. So that when you get people that are trying to present a coherent body of data david M. Jacobs, John Mack, myself, we're then going into a pool that has been heavily polluted and then you get the stuff coming out of the channeling community.
Actually, we can start talking about that with regard to our new projects that we're coming out with. But the stuff that's coming out of the channeling community is so incredibly well done in terms of propaganda outlets and it's coming through with people who are incredibly earnest, trustworthy, really great people. If someone's lying to you let's say you go to get a car, you go to a used car dealer, or you go to a car dealer of some type.
For example, I was looking for a van to purchase quite a lot many years ago. And I went to a dealership. I won't mention the dealership or the brand or anything, but I went to one and they had a whole bunch of vans. And then they had this guy I'm sorry to describe no names or anything, but the guy had a real strong limp in one eye, and he was an older guy with a real strong limp in one eye.
And he came up and he said, Can I help you? And I said, yeah, I'm looking for a van. Well, we have lots of vans here. Yeah, but I'm looking at these vans. And I had already known that I wanted front wheel drive. This is back in the old days when front wheel drive and a modern van I looked at him and I said, yeah, but I'm looking at these things and these look like rear wheel drive vans.
And he looked at me and he said with his one eye and he said, that's right. Rear wheel drive. Like, that was a really great, strong selling point. He was trying to sell me he was trying to sell me a van that I didn't want, didn't have the stuff I want. But he made it sound really great. I could have said, but there's a hole in the roof.
And he would have said, that's right, there's a hole in the roof. That's a really great hole in the roof. That's the best thing. And there's no extra charge for that. So it was like the information that you have being thrown at you with the whole disclosure stuff is so off the wall and covering so many different realms and so much basic blatant lying. But unlike the car salesman, where I could see he had the perfect look, a limp, one eye coming.
It was very easy not to believe. It was very easy for me to say, this is a car dealer salesman right out of the movies, and he's trying to pull the wool over my eyes, and that's not the van I want. It was easy to see that with the Channeling community, it's the reverse. Those people are really good. They're vivacious, they're enthusiastic, they love the fact that they're trying to make a difference.
They're truthful, they're earnest, and they come across that way, and then you have the information coming through them being total propaganda. You can't see it very easily as propaganda. It's not obvious. Like with that one eyed, limpy car salesman, it was these with the Channeling community is much different. So we have a project coming out in about a week called the Secret Space Program. And that's really super interesting.
And I can tell you now that the project we're giving out, that's a month later than that is on the Graze, which is really interesting because I can talk about it now because all the remote viewing is done, it's all recorded. The paper sessions actually it's done on iPads, they're done. And all of the video recordings of the final sessions are done. So it's all locked and sealed and delivered.
So if that wasn't done, I couldn't talk about it publicly. But with the secret space program, look at it this way, it should not be in dispute by anyone who's looking at this that the US government has real extraterrestrial spacecraft, crashed ships as well as intact ships. And then this is the thing I asked you last time I was on your show. What do you think the government, military people are doing with those ships? Do you think they had their troops surrounding the ships and they started campfire and they all sing Kumbaya? No, that's not what's going to happen.
The generals are going to say, I want those things reverse engineered. I want those things, I want us to have those things as well. And they put a huge amount of the black budget military stuff, which is the largest section of the entire military budget, meaning the largest section of the entire military budget. You don't have any idea where it's going. Given the huge level of military spending, the largest chunk of it, there is no background, there's no traceable.
You don't know where it's going. And a lot of people, even in Congress, they don't know where it's going. It's just like black. No one knows about it. It's done. So they would want their own versions of these spaceships. Now they've had a number of decades since the old Roswell crash to work on this. Plus they have signed agreements, as Said Bachayim Bashed, former head of the Israeli Space Directorate, that there's cooperative relationships with certain groups of extraterrestrials to help them with the tech.
So you can assume that by this time they have their own versions of those spaceships. They have figured out how the propulsion system works, how things are powered and so on like that. So if you do that, the last thing a military is going to want to do is to publicize that they're absolutely nonstop, no questions asked, not going to have a press release that tells people about that.
They're not going to use any of those ships, any of that tech, in any military confrontation unless it's an absolute desperate thing. But they're definitely not going to be shipping any of that technology to the Ukraine war. You're not going to see it. You're not going to see them flying that stuff together with the Blue Angels in the jets. You're not going to see any of that tech.
As far as they're concerned, the tech will not exist. And by holding back on whether the extraterrestrials actually exist, they're then preventing the next question is, well, if they do exist, and The Ships exist. The next question is, where is our version of those ships? Check this out. I am super stoked about this. We are Pivoting and we are going to offer you exclusive content, ad free, uncensored on patreon.
There's a whole bunch of stuff that I've wanted to talk about for the past few years that I haven't been able to really talk about, and now I'm going to talk about it. We're going to talk about it on Patreon. You can watch it on Patreon and you can sign up for as little as a buck. So check us out. Ad free. You're going to love it. Be the change you want to see and see at Patreon.
You. It. It. .
Exploring the Enigma of Extraterrestrial Existence and Media Narratives
1. Extraterrestrial Debates Heat Up
The ever-evolving discourse on the existence of extraterrestrials and UFOs has taken a new turn. University professors, once confined to strictly earthly discussions, are now voicing considerations of alien abductions and the possibility of otherworldly experiments. Whispers of cover-ups by media and governmental bodies have fueled the fires of conspiracy, while organizations like the Farsight Institute are working diligently to shed light on documented UFO sightings. Amidst these uncertain times, some have found solace in diversifying their portfolios, with financial services like Noble Gold Investments gaining traction. However, whistleblowers brave enough to share their encounters with extraterrestrial life face aggressive discrediting tactics.
2. Veterans, PTSD, and the Pentagon’s Controversial Stance
Mounting concerns arise surrounding the Pentagon’s handling of veterans returning from Afghanistan, especially those grappling with PTSD. These heroes’ claims of unidentified aerial phenomena and chilling extraterrestrial activities have largely fallen on deaf ears, further fueling speculation of a broader cover-up—some even suggesting connections to global human trafficking rings. With scholars giving weight to UFO abduction phenomena, there’s a growing sentiment that such events mask a sinister extraterrestrial agenda. Breaking this cycle may lie in unraveling the secrets of UFOs, their elusive nature, and their potential influence on human behavior.
3. The Uphill Battle for UFO Disclosure
Disclosing the truth about extraterrestrial existence is no easy feat. The Farsight organization, via intricate remote viewing exercises, has pieced together compelling evidence suggesting our universe isn’t quite as empty as we believed. However, they face challenges from a skeptical public, demanding physical evidence, and an elusive extraterrestrial population.
4. Overcoming Skepticism and Media Bias in Extraterrestrial Communication
Speaking of otherworldly encounters and UFO sightings becomes a test of patience and conviction. Not everyone possesses the training—or the will—to grasp such phenomena. While some enthusiasts employ modified cameras to catch a glimpse of the unknown, others believe that mastering the mental aspects of these encounters is pivotal. However, terms like ‘ascension’ and dimensional existence often detract from the conversation. The term ‘ISBE’, or ‘Immortal Spiritual Being’, has emerged as a central theme—highlighting entities that can be misled but never truly extinguished. It’s crucial, in this digital age, to find unbiased information, yet media outlets like Fox News and CNN often fail this test. Alternative platforms, such as The Hill and Breaking Points on YouTube, however, offer hope for unbiased reporting.
5. The Struggle of Alternate News Outlets
While alternate news platforms like The Hill and Breaking Points provide fresh perspectives on underreported topics, they face challenges from media juggernauts. Quality journalism often finds itself overshadowed by mainstream entertainment, leaving these outlets scrambling for visibility. Interestingly, platforms like TikTok in China have harnessed their reach for educational means.
6. The Murky Waters of Personal Experiences and Allegations
Personal experiences involving entities like UFOs and Bigfoot often blur the lines between fact and fiction. The “Secret Space Program” project aims to shed light on these gray areas. Rumors suggest that the U.S. government not only possesses real extraterrestrial spacecraft but has also reverse-engineered them with a mix of hidden military budgets and extraterrestrial aid.
Stay tuned as we continue to navigate the vast, uncharted territories of extraterrestrial existence and the narratives that surround them
-
The Leak Project is an esteemed member of the Truth Mafia, holding Tommy Truthful's certification. With a vast wealth of knowledge, they have gifted us the Serpent Verse and the Eagle. Furthermore, they were the pioneering force behind an exclusive interview, revealing unprecedented wisdom to the masses. Delve into the ancient war, characterized by the fierce rivalry between two brothers, Enki and Enlil. Brace yourself for a truly unique and captivating experience.
View all posts
Video Summary
Summary
➡ The text discusses the ongoing debates around extraterrestrial existence and UFOs. These debates are sparked by professionals, like university professors, who consider alien abductions and extraterrestrial experiments real. There's also discussion about a potential cover-up conspiracy by government and media parties. The text also mentions UFO sightings documented by Farsight Institute, and their efforts to wake up the public to such experiences. A recommendation for using Noble Gold Investments for financial stability is noted. Lastly, the conversation touches on discrediting tactics targeting whistleblowers revealing details about extraterrestrial encounters.
➡ The text discloses concerns with the Pentagon's interactions with veterans from Afghanistan, particularly those suffering from PTSD. There is criticism regarding neglect of their reports on unidentified aerial phenomena and extraterrestrial activities, which link with allegations of a widespread human trafficking operation. Additionally, it highlights the support of academics for UFO abduction phenomena, suggesting that these act as a cover-up for problematic actions by extraterrestrial entities. The challenge posed is in breaking through the methods of control which have, seemingly, been perfected over millions of years. The key to this might lie in further study of UFOs, their cloaking abilities and the strategies they use to manipulate human behavior.
➡ The text discusses the challenges faced by those wanting to disclose extraterrestrial truths, highlighting public distrust and controlled opposition as major issues. It explains how the extensive work of the Farsight organization, via remote viewing exercises, has gathered compelling evidence of extraterrestrial existences – though admitted hurdles include unrealistic public demands and a lack of physical visual sighting of extraterrestrial beings.
➡ The speaker discusses about communicating with extraterrestrials and the difficulty in convincing others about UFOs and alien existence, especially as most people lack the training to understand such phenomena. They mention using modified cameras to spot UFOs and argue that accepting the mental aspect of extraterrestrial communication is the biggest hurdle. The speaker also dismisses assumed concepts of 'ascension' and dimensional existence, labeling them as manipulative propaganda. They introduce the term 'ISBE', standing for 'Immortal Spiritual Being', and argue that while these ISBEs can be tricked or enslaved, they cannot be killed. The conversation transitions to discussing media bias, citing partisan representations in outlets like Fox News and CNN. Alternative, objective outlets such as The Hill and Breaking Points, particularly on platforms like YouTube, are proposed as alternative news sources.
➡ The text discusses the role of alternate news outlets like The Hill and Breaking Points, which cover underrepresented topics but struggle to break through due to media control. Despite having a professional and appealing setup, these outlets are unable to compete with mainstream entertainment channels in terms of viewership. The text suggests that nonsensical and superficial content tends to dominate the media landscape, overshadowing serious and substantial content. The Chinese model of TikTok is highlighted for its educational approach. The speaker suggests that although these outlets contribute valuable content, media control makes it difficult for them to gain visibility.
➡ The speaker discusses the complicated issue of unverifiable personal experiences involving entities and phenomena such as UFOs and Bigfoot, lamenting a lack of coherency due to a mixture of misinformation. He mentions an upcoming project named "Secret Space Program" and alleges the existence of real extraterrestrial spacecraft in the possession of the US government, suggesting that these have been reverse-engineered through a black budget component of military spending and help from extraterrestrials. However, he claims this won't be publicly revealed due to military strategy and secrecy.
➡ Despite speculation, the advanced technology seen in some conflicts won't be seen in Ukraine or in conjunction with the Blue Angels; furthermore, the existence of extraterrestrial tech is still in question. Additionally, note the upcoming pivot to Patreon for exclusive, ad-free, uncensored content discussing previously untouched topics.
Video Transcription
Summary
Video TranscriptionI like looking at the work of David M. Jacobs and John Mack in this field because they're also professors like me. And so I sort of like reading their stuff, and I like looking at their stuff because it's so well documented. Here we have two professors talking about the abduction phenomenon as a real thing. And during the disclosure stuff that you have going on in Congress, no one's talking about what the ETS are doing, but you have professors talking about this.
And then you have the former head of the Israeli space Directorate saying these experiments are going on and that there are written agreements between the US. Government and the extraterrestrials. No one's bringing that up. This stuff is so extremely well orchestrated. The issue that I have been sort of wrestling with, and we can segue into some of the new results that we have for some of the new projects we have coming out.
The question is, how do you save humanity? How do you save the planet? Anybody else a little bit stressed out about finances right now? Yeah, join the club. You're not the only one. Noble Gold Investments can help you with that. Actually, let me read to you a couple of testimonials directly from people that Noble Gold Investments has helped. Here's the first one. The Noble crew walked me through everything.
No stress. Exclamation point. Here's another one. With their help, I can finally sleep easy at night. And now this month, noble Gold Investments is handing out free five ounce silver. America the beautiful coins. These are wonderful collector coins. I actually have a couple of these. And find out how you qualify, click the link specific just for Leak Project listeners. Go to leakprojectgold. com. Give them a call. 1877-646-5347.
They have an a plus rating with the Better Business Bureau countless five star reviews. Nopel. Gold Investments is the gold company that I trust. Ladies and gentlemen, Rex Spare. Leak Project. How the heck are you? Hey, will you look at who it is? Dr. Courtney Brown. How cool is that? So after a pretty decent hiatus away from the video and these incredible podcasts and information streams, dr. Courtney Brown is back.
We've had a couple of great interviews the past several months, and today we're going to talk about the latest information on full disclosure. Also, the grays. What are they really? There's so many conflicting stories. I've heard just about everything. Dr. Brown, great to see you. Just want to say it's great to be here. Wanted everybody to go to Farsightinstitute. org. And for the major projects, full videos, the latest and greatest.
Check out farsightprime. com. What is going on? Last time you came on the show, you had an incredible camera that was picking up, I think, 120 frames per second. You had it retrofitted, and you were showing these just incredible anomalies in the sky. And since then, I know you've been up to a lot. So let's talk about it. Yeah. Rex there's only one way to tell people really what's going on in the world, and that is through a gradual element of take a look at this and take a look at that, and take a look at that and take a look at that.
So what I wanted to really emphasize is something that's on my mind constantly these days, especially this month and last month. It's just becoming big in my head is the way to convince the whole world that this is real, that the whole extraterrestrial thing is real, but not just with regard to what the mainstream media is debating with. Are we alone in the universe? That's such a stupid question.
The question is, what are the extraterrestrials doing? No one's asking that. They're all questioning do they exist or do the UFOs exist? Do the UAPs exist? Do the extraterrestrials? But no one's talking about what they're doing. So the real problem I'm getting to is how do you actually wake up an entire public? So we have a gradual number of things that we're trying to do, because you can't just throw the kitchen sink at people.
You have to sort of lead them into something. And the first element is people always have their phones. So we have started, starting this year, to video record UFOs UAPs and put them up on my Instagram page. Courtney brown farsight. That's free. And if you sort of are really skeptical, you always have your phone. You just go instagram? Courtney Brown Farsight and there's a whole bunch of videos.
Now there are a lot of people putting up UFO videos on the web, on Instagram, on Facebook. There's all types of people doing that. But I do not think there's anyone giving methods for how to do this and then showing repeatedly how we get these videos of UFOs every single time we go out. Meaning if someone has a UFO video or a picture, it's a one off. It's the one thing they do in their whole life, and that's just it.
And then they post it on Instagram or YouTube or whatever. And then given the fact there's over 7 billion people on the planet, almost 8 billion people over time, there's a lot of UFO videos, but each one is a one off for each person. I believe we're the only group that are repeatedly showing one after the next at the next. So it's not that we have one video.
We have literally, at this point, hundreds of videos. And we're actually, in terms of UAPs, we've probably got five or 600 actual UAPs on our videos. And in terms of the ones on Instagram, those are just random selections of the stuff that we've been seeing as astounding as they are. And many people have said that the videos that we have up on Instagram of these UFOs are like the best that exists out there.
They're way better than anything that you get released by the military. Military has really perfect resolution, excellent videos, but the ones that release are really crappy. So the issue is, I think we're the largest or maybe the only venue where you can get a whole bunch of videos taken by the same people over and over, over. Go again with the methods for how we do it. Clearly explained so it can be replicated.
That's point number one. So that's sort of entryway number one. Yet I don't see anybody in Congress talking about what we're doing. I do see people at UFO conferences now, odly saying things like, don't look at the sky. Getting UFOs is so rare, it's so unusual, you can't do it. Don't even try. They're talking down the effort, which I think those people are probably plants that are antidisclosure people that are being set up to say this in order to discourage people.
Because once we actually showed how it can be done repeatedly, regularly, all the time, and any ten minute section segment that you video record using the methods and the cameras and so on, and the editing methods that we use, you get them. I think the establishment is sort of pushing back, and they have people that they have planted everywhere. The agencies, we'll just call them the agencies have people that they can call on in every major news organization.
They definitely have people in every major UFO group that'll go up and say the party lied to steer people away from the fact that the UFOs are out there all over the place. So we have that. It's not just that there's a disclosure movement, but the active intent to stop disclosure is extremely active. There's so much going on. All the mainstream news has been put into a sandbox.
Whenever you get into the UFO groups, you have people coming out, directing people in the wrong direction. It's extremely well organized and it's seemingly seamless. The people that go up in the UFO conferences that say things like, don't look for UFOs, don't look to the sky. It's a rare thing. They look like they have the right credentials. They look sort of new agey. They sound hip, they sound sort of but people who have been doing this know how to dress people up to look like that.
They're not going to send somebody that looks like an IBM executive into a UFO conference and tell people, don't look in the skies. They're going to get someone who looks apart and sounds part and has the right credentials. And you won't ever know their background, where their money sources are coming from, what connections they have. You won't get that. And then when you get the hearings that are going on in Congress, like with David Grush and other whistleblowers, right after that, you get people coming out and discrediting David Grush.
And when David Grush, he was never the main thing anyway. He was the people that he talked with that are the main thing. Those are the people that actually gave the information. He was just relaying that he had talked to a certain number of people. So when you try to discredit David Grush, as has been done with regard to his PTSD after serving in Afghanistan and subsequent alcoholism, it's distracting everybody from the real question is, he still has his security clearance, he still works in the UF in the Pentagon.
The issue is, who did he talk with anyway? People who are comrade veterans that came back from Afghanistan. Lots of them have histories of PTSD after they come back from that. So that was sort of a classic. Distract people away from by discrediting or trying to discredit david grush, they're distracting people away from the real thing, which is who he's been talking with and is reporting on that's.
40 or 50 people who have actually worked hands on with the UAPs or UFOs and the people that are on them. So there's that. And then there's the issue of people who have actually said things that corroborate the stuff that we're doing. So A, we have repeated videos. It's not one video like the so called tic TAC video that the military released that everyone in the military keeps I mean, everyone in the media keeps showing.
We have repeated videos, and we show people how to do it themselves. So that's step number one. Step number two is, what are the AETS actually doing? So once you get to the question of that they exist, then the next question is, what are they doing? And that's what's motivating the real antidisclosure movement. The government has a real serious problem. They have written agreements with the extraterrestrials to conduct so called experiments.
And these experiments are not experiments at all. Actually, that's just a word to sort of make it sound scientifically and things like that. The reality is they're involved in a huge human trafficking operation, and that's what they're trying to cover up. Now, let's look at a couple of things. We have done remote viewing studies on over 75 major projects involving the UFOs, plus we have and the methodologies and the quality of our stuff is unequaled anywhere.
Now, in addition to that, look at a couple of other things that have been done by other people that corroborate what we're talking about. Chaim Ashed. H-A-I-M Ashed. He was the former head of the Israeli Space Directorate. That's their version of NASA, israel's version of NASA for 30 years. He's also a very decorated retired general. He's general, and he's still considered General Ashed, and he's now also a professor.
Hayemashed has said in a written interview, in an interview that appeared in an Israeli newspaper, he's never backed away from it. Is that the extraterrestrials exist. They're here, they're conducting experiments, and the United States government and perhaps some other governments have written agreements that allow them to do this. He doesn't go into what these experiments are. But nonetheless, he has verified this is the former head of the Israeli Space Directorate for 30 years.
He has verified, in fact, that the extraterrestrials are real. They're here, and they're doing experiments. Secondly, you have academics who have studied this so called abduction phenomenon. Now, one is John Mack, the late John Mack, who is the Harvard professor, founder of his department of psychiatry at Harvard Hospital. But you also have David M. Jacobs, who is the he's now retired professor of history. And he wrote a bunch of books.
But this is a recent book of his, which is Walking Among US. Walking among us. The alien plan to control humanity. Using that as a start off point. But it's similar to what John Mack's book goes into the reality of the abduction phenomenon, where extraterrestrials abduct people in the middle of the night, typically, and then do stuff to them, experiments on their body, implanting fetuses, taking fetuses out, in and out in terms of genetic experiments that are going on.
And if you look at those two guys, those are academics. And they have actually done a huge number of interviews with people, often under hypnosis, but eventually, even without hypnosis, to have people explain their memories of these abduction experiences. So there's another guy called Bob Lazar. Now, most people in the UFO community know about Bob Lazar, but one of the interviews that he mentioned about, he was someone who worked in Area 51, and he has talked about people involved in the beings ETS involved in the abduction phenomenon.
And he has said that they have the ability to essentially anesthesize someone and then do these biological, these experiments, these things on them, sort of their version of going to the operating room and putting you asleep, but they have a mental ability to do that. But one of the things that Bob Lazar has talked about that's interesting is that they do this all mentally telepathically. They have a way to anesthesize someone from mind to mind control.
However, that ability to do that degrades becomes almost impossible to do if the person is under any level of stimulus, for example, amphetamines coffee or an emotionally agitated state, people are harder to do. You can't do that easily with them, which largely explains why the abduction phenomena happens at night when people are asleep. And it also explains why it's easy to bring the memories back. They're essentially given a hypnotic suggestion during the abduction phenomena to forget, to not remember this.
And that's why when people are under hypnosis, they can bring these memories back of what happened to them when they were on the ships. So what I'm pointing out is that these are two professors, david M. Jacobs and John Mack, in major universities. I'm a professor in a major university as well, but I don't do any of this stuff that I'm talking about. Now, at my university there, I teach math and stats in a department of in a social science program, a social science department.
But nonetheless, I like looking at the work of David M. Jacobs and John Mack in this field because they're also professors like me. And so I sort of like reading their stuff and I like looking at their stuff because it's so well documented. So here we have two professors talking about the abduction phenomenon as a real thing. And during the disclosure stuff that you have going on in Congress, no one's talking about what the ETS are doing, but you have professors talking about this.
And then you have the former head of the Israeli Space Directorate saying these experiments are going on and there are written agreements between the US government and the extraterrestrials. No one's bringing that up in these disclosure things. It's like the stuff is so extremely well orchestrated. So the issue that I have been sort of wrestling with and we can segue into some of the new results that we have for some of the new projects we have coming out, but the question is, how do you save humanity? How do you save the planet? And now you're involved with this heavily, Rex, because you've been running this show of yours for a very long time, and you're actually involved in trying to wake people up and change people's minds and get the information out on all types of things.
You've had lots of people on your shows talking about things. But we're still in a situation of denial where the disclosure is very fringy. Even the stuff that goes on in Congress, it's very fringy. And even when something comes out like how to take videos of UFOs reliably, you get people showing up at UFO conferences saying, don't try to do that. Don't look in the skies. How do you actually break through with that, given the level of control? Now, this is the thing I want to bring to your attention.
Who's ever doing it? On the extraterrestrial side, our projects clearly indicate at farsight that this has been going on for thousands of years. Who's ever doing this on this antidisclosure process, on the Et side, on the extraterrestrial side, has had millions of years to fine tune how to control a population. So who's ever doing this isn't doing this. For the first time, they really know how to massage a population, how to channel all of the different media outlets in a certain way, how to get the political people to act in a certain way, how to get the information that's gotten to the public to be muted in a certain way.
They've got millions of years, not tens of thousands, and not just like ten years, 30 years. They've got a huge amount of time to perfect this. And then there's people like you and me who are trying to go against that, who are trying to break the planet out of the spell that they have that keeps him imprisoned and we're going up against a group that has had millions of years to fine tune, to perfect the process of containing the information.
And that is a real serious issue. You have Haim Ashed mentioning stuff like that. You have academics. John Mack. David M. Jacobs. How do you break through? And then we have on our side showing absolutely verifiable evidence of this whole thing being real. Not only showing you UFO videos, but also saying the only way we can get those UFO videos is by doing certain techniques, photographic techniques that clearly demonstrate that the UFOs are trying to hide themselves, that they are behind the whole process of stopping the disclosure.
They could easily slow down, fly slower and turn off the cloaking stuff that would allow us to take pictures, invisible light rather than infrared. They don't do that. They obviously want to keep this a hidden thing. By the way, Chaim Bassett has also mentioned that the ETS have specifically said in the agreements that they do not want anything dealing with them to go public. That's part of the agreements that the US must keep everything hidden, keep everything secret.
So it's part of the written agreements that the US has bought into. So given that type of a background, you have to just I have lots to say that will give you hope and inspiration. But to start out with, you have to say, are we just spinning our wheels? Are we just twiddling our thumbs? You and I, despite the fact that we have a major website, we have a YouTube channel that's quite successful, and we have our own streaming service that gives all of our projects, public projects, all of this stuff.
Plus we have multiple venues that we use to show the UFO videos. You have academics talking about the reality of this stuff. You get former head of the Israeli Space Directorate mentioning, are we just spinning our wheels? Because no matter what we do with all of this stuff, it doesn't seem to be enough. Let me pause. Well, let me jump in on that because the problem is, for so many years they have given us the opposite stories.
So people get to the point when they do start to do drip disclosure, they're like, okay, what's the agenda here? So that's one problem. The second problem is, like you said, there's what appears to be much controlled opposition out there that wants to control the narrative. And in doing so, they're like, oh, don't look up at the skies is one thing. And then there's other people out there that are the exact opposite, right? They come back and they're like, yes, I met a Gray that was married to a Nordic and it came back to me with Bigfoot, and it was the most amazing experience I ever had.
I just can't believe and then you've got people that try and be serious and make all these claims, and they take it all the way back to the Anunnaki, and you actually listen to what they're saying, and you can tell that they're just reading from a script whether or not they made it up or somebody told them to make it up. But I'll tell you what, I have been doing this long enough now to see that many of the people that at one point I looked up to, I'm looking at now, like, are you guys intentionally stuck or are you just not willing to see more than what you know? Because there's a lot of disinformation out there, right? So that's one of the problems, is now that we can show technical evidence.
And then, for example, the doctor from Israel, the head of the Space Force, Haima Shed, when that guy came out and brought up the people on Mars or the beans on Mars that weren't ready to make disclosure yet, I thought to myself, yep, he's legit. But then the problem is people are going to come out and they're going to say, oh, because he's a part of the program, he's disinformation.
And then that recent disclosure in Washington where they know the huge disclosure movement there, one of the guys there was wearing a pin that looked like the United Nations Global Agenda Summit pin, like the WEF pin. And I'm like, oh, really? So what are your thoughts on that? It's almost impossible to point to any one agency or person as being responsible for the antidisclosure movement. It's so widespread and so multifaceted.
But over this last month, it really has sunk into me. Believe it or not, even though I've been doing this for like decades, it's really sunk into me. We're up against a group, an extraterrestrial group that has literally had millions of years that's not an overstatement. They've literally had millions of years to finesse, how to control a population, and they know how to do this, and they're doing it extremely well.
And if we do not have some extra element, it would be impossible for us to break through. There's only so much that we can do. We can amass information. We can show that. I'm an academic, so I like to, in a figurative sense, give footnotes. I like to say where the information is coming from and to compile it and to build a case, like a legal case. So bringing up Haya Mashed, bringing up David M.
Jacobs, bringing up John Mack, these are all parts of the evidence that is accumulating to do this. And then when we have our own studies with remote viewing, as well as the photography, video stuff that sort of adds to that body of in, the people who are anti disclosure will always look, well, this a lot of the information that Farsight does with Courtney Brown, that's just remote viewing.
So how do you know that's real or anything like that? But one of the things that's consistent with everybody who does any deep work with the UFOs extraterrestrial thing is that the extraterrestrials do everything mentally. They fly their ships mentally, they communicate mentally. They may have words that they use verbally, but that's not their primary means of communication. Their primary means of normal communication is mental, like telepathy type of stuff.
For them, the stuff that we do at Farsight is normal. And in addition, the issue of being invisible is an issue to a lot of people. They want to be able to see the UFOs. Now, we've been showing videos of the UFOs, but people often say, no, that's not enough. I want them to be in your backyard and a close up, and I want to see through the window and I want to see the alien looking through that window out.
That's what I want. And you sort of know that's that's a little bit of a stretch. We don't have those types of videos, but we have otherwise very convincing videos of them flying over our house, over our houses, and over the beach and over the Pensacola Naval Air Station, over Africa. And so we have videos of the ships flying right over no, I want to see the window and I want to see the alien.
So there's sort of that level of problems. And there's also the issue of not being able to see the extraterrestrials always physically when they're right in front of you. Now, one of the things that's interesting on our remote viewing side is when we do remote viewing, most, like 98% of extraterrestrials that we run into using our remote viewers and our remote viewers are the best on the planet.
They go through a year of full time training before they even start anything. They always work under total blind, very defendable, scientifically defendable conditions, always totally blind. And they do paper sessions. They're actually on iPads as well as video sessions at the very end where they present their information all totally blind. And then they corroborate each other. So we have four or five remote viewers doing a project and they don't communicate with each other, they don't know each other's work, and they all come in with the same stuff.
That by itself is very convincing. But when we do these remote viewings and the remote viewers end up in front of an extraterrestrial, like in front of a gray or reptilian or just a humanoid that looks like you and me, they can see us. They actually see us. Now, you might think of it like a ghost image or whatever, but the extraterrestrials stare right at us and say they're there.
And if you were there with the extraterrestrial looking at us, you wouldn't see us. Like if you were standing next to the extraterrestrial and we were remote viewing, that extraterrestrial, the extraterrestrial can see us remote viewing, we actually show up. But if you were there standing next to the extraterrestrial, you'd ask the extraterrestrial, what are you looking at? I don't see anything. So the issue is that when you're just using your eyes, the Ocular image is coming through, you don't see anything.
But with the larger senses, the mental senses, you can perceive and see clothing and everything, the beings that are there. So what I'm actually pointing out here is that this is quite a common phenomenon that is discussed in some of the books that I just mentioned, david M. Jacobs and John Mack, the mental nature of the UFO phenomenon. And it's very common in all of our projects. But the interesting thing is it shouldn't then be too much of a surprise that our group of remote viewers who have been trained so extensively and have had so much experience going back many years of experience it should.
Not be a surprise to you that we have developed the same capabilities as the extraterrestrials that we're remote viewing, so that when we interact with the extraterrestrials, we can see them. Like if they're next to us, we can see them, we can have a conversation with them, we can communicate in the same way that the extraterrestrials can communicate with us when we pop up and we show up in a ship and we're standing in front of them so that they can communicate with us.
Now, similarly, if I'm on the beach, for example, and I'm having a communication with Harvey, that's one of the shows that we have@farsightprime. com that's exactly the same type of mean. I can see them, but others may not be able to see them. So the issue with that confronts humanity is they don't have the extensive training that we have had, so they don't understand how could you see something that you can't see? So there is sort of that level of confusion.
And the real question is, how do you get to be able to convince people that the UFOs are real, that the extraterrestrials real, that we interact with them, that that's all real when you don't actually always see them. The only thing we've been able to crack so far is to be able to see them using modified cameras that evade their stealth tech, to be able to see them flying right over our house at low altitudes, below the cloud level right there.
But the other aspect of trying to get people to buy into the mental whole component of the extraterrestrial phenomenon is absolutely huge. And how do you actually get them to understand that when they've never experienced it, when they don't remember anything, experiencing it themselves? So it's a huge thing for us to do. All this blocking has a reason for it, but it's part of the game of controlling a population.
There's a reason why people have trouble seeing these things. It's not normal in the galaxy anyway. I should pause here, but I have more to say about this. But I wanted to pause. I don't want to keep on going. I could keep on. Talking another two. Oh, well, no, this is great. And I'll keep listening for 2 hours. I appreciate I'm also I'm taking notes as you're talking and I remember talking to Dr.
Jacobs maybe five, six years ago, and one of the things I asked him was I was like, where are these things from? And he said, if I remember it correctly, may not be pervaded or whatever, but he said it doesn't matter. And I think it does matter personally, but it seems to me like oftentimes I wonder are they from even a different dimension, maybe? Are they from the fourth dimension somehow and they can kind of pop into this third dimension, or are they really from Zeta Reticuli? I'm having a tough time buying that Zeta Reticuli story.
And that was David Jacobs that said that to you, is that right? Well, no, it was Betty and Barney Hill said anything about he didn't know where they're from. He doesn't know where they're from is what I remember. Well, there's an issue when people talk about from another dimension. Unfortunately, there's been a lot of pollution of the entire field coming from the channeling community. And they talk about other dimensions, other realities, and they talk about it also in terms of ascension, that humanity is almost ready to graduate and become brothers and sisters and be embraced by their brothers and sisters in the galaxy that are warm and fuzzy and ready to welcome them and all that stuff.
All of that is manipulative garbage coming out from a fascist based extraterrestrial thing. You have to understand that these beings have had millions of years to fine tune this. There is no possible way they would not take advantage of the channeling community direct input. You're talking about replicating a thousand Tokyo Rose type people, meaning people that, except worse, tokyo Rose at least knew she was lying during World War II to the American soldiers that they were broadcasting out to.
The channeling community is even worse because these are some of the very best human beings that exist on the planet. They're really good, honest, trustworthy people. They have really the best intent, and they really are trying to make a big effort to help humanity. They come across as incredibly truthful because they are these fascist extraterrestrial groups look at that and say, that's perfect. That's the venue that we want to shovel or shut it out into.
So they push this stuff out through the channeling community about you're going to go through the ascension, you're going through the level three, you're going to the fourth level, then you're going to able to go to the fifth level, and so on like that. All of which is total garbage. There is no levels like that. There is no ascension process. The ascension process is part of the propaganda that makes you think that there's an end to the evolution.
All we have to do is get better. And that also feeds into the propaganda for encouraging people to recycle, to come back, to reincarnate, to come back and have life after life after life eternally, to improve so they can eventually move up to the higher levels of existence. But all of that is garbage. None of that is real. We don't call ourselves souls or spirits because that comes with all that pollution of religious control stuff.
So we call everybody an ISBE. Everyone Is for the purpose of being. And we live inside, we animate these physical bodies and it's impossible. We have found out it is impossible, literally impossible. No one apparently in the entire universe has figured out how to kill an Isbee. So it's not possible to kill somebody. You can kill the physical body, but the consciousness, the awareness, the actual person is still there, alive and well, alive and kicking.
However, you can trick an Isbee. You can deceive an ISBE, you can capture, you can enslave, you can do all types of bad things to an ISBE, but you cannot kill an Isbee. So what you get is this extremely extensive process to trick an ISBE. And the whole Isbee that we're talking now about everyone on the planet to trick these isbees into having their own sort of belief system that they believe in so fervently that they won't give it up.
And then you and I come in with the idea that, hey, these extraterrestrials are real and they're doing bad shit and you need to actually do something that will actually wake up in order to break out of the prison. And you're going up against a mind control effort that has millions of years of practice and thousands of years on the planet Earth to finesse, to fine tune. And it's really challenging.
I actually would like for a second, if you want, I'd like to segue into some political stuff. I'm not talking partisan things now, but some political things that sort of give you an evidence for sort of the basic problem when you have such a highly controlled media stuff and it affects us as well as everybody else, but you can see it in the political realm. Let's talk about yeah, okay.
So now this is not critical and it's not partisan. Meaning I'm not siding with any one side or anyone group, but in basic terms, you can clearly say that Fox News has become a major outlet for the Republican Party, Trump and things like that. And they basically are the spokesperson, the media spokesperson. It's not an objective thing. They're not an open and objective news outlet. They really have that very clear partisan point of view and their own way of promoting that.
On the other side of things, you can clearly see that CNN, for example, some people also talk about MSNBC, but let's just take about CNN. They're the same with Biden and the Democratic side in terms of promoting that side. So they always vilify the right wing. And then on the Fox News side, they always vilify the left wing and so like that they're very dependable news outlets to represent their side.
Well, then you can say, okay, well, are there any objective news outlets out there that actually try to show things sort of the way things used to be, like 20 or 30 years ago, where you could actually get objective news outlets that were really trying to be nonpartisan and so on? Well, there's a couple, for example, that I have sort of found they have an issue of money.
How do you have enough money to be an outlet? So becoming a printed news outlet like The New York Times, that's really not accessible to a alternate news source. So you're really talking about an electronic dissemination similar to the way CNN and CNN and Fox News go. And then you're talking about what would be their best venue in terms of eyeballs. You're probably talking about YouTube being the only real place they can do that.
So two interesting people, two interesting groups are The Hill and Breaking Points. Now, if you allow me to share my screen, I can just give you an idea. All right? Yeah. Okay, here's, for example, the hill now the Hill is a news outlet. They are alternate news outlet, but they try to be as objective as possible. They're really bending over backwards to show both the Republican and the Democratic side of things and so on.
And they have lots of videos that they put out every day they have and their stories every day they have like ten videos that they put out and their stories covered the whole gamut of everything. And they actually make a huge effort to cover things that are not being covered by the main chain. For example, on the Democratic side, robert F. Kennedy, Jr. And Mariana Williamson are never mentioned at all on CNN.
Period. Yet they're both campaigning for the presidency and the Democratic primaries. And you can sort of say what? Because if you look at CNN, for example, they only have Biden and they don't mention at all that there is any competition whatsoever on the Democratic side. And so you do get people like at The Hill talking about them and interviewing the Robert F. Kennedy. Interestingly, Fox News is actually and Tucker Carlson has actually given Robert F.
Kennedy a considerable amount of coverage interviewing and stuff like so and then you look at the view counts. That what they have. And if you look at the view counts for the videos, I'll click on here, just the videos so I don't get their highlighted ones, just view counts that they have. And you get views 10,000, 7000, 8000, 12,000. And then I'll scroll further down 2000, 8000, 10,000.
And a few of them are big, like here's one at 845,000 about Rand Paul doing something. But most of them are in the ten to 20 ish actually five to 20 ish realm, which is not a lot, but it's a very professional news outlet and sense that they really make a big effort. It looks great, they have the best equipment, they're trying to be objective. Now there's another group called Breaking Points.
Those are two other people that dominate that but they all have other people working. Oh by the way, I should say that the Hill has 1. 73 million subscribers but their videos don't get more than a few thousand watches. Then if you look at Breaking Points, these people, I believe, used to work at The Hill then they offered something else. But they have their own YouTube station now, Breaking Points, and I think they're still collaborative and they're friends with the of but it's a similar type of thing as to hill and they put up fewer videos but still every day there's videos but some of their videos are a little bit have greater view counts.
They have fewer subscribers, they have only a million subscribers. So here you get some 10,000 but you get a few more that get into the 58, 7150 thousand, things like that. But still you're still getting a lot in the so you're still not getting a lot of views. So I'm stopping the sharing now just to give those as two. So what you basically have is two alternate news outlets that are very polished, as polished as anything you'll get on CNN or Fox.
And they're trying to be sort of objective. And they're successful in the sense that they are still doing it, but they're not breaking through. They're not getting to the millions. They're nowhere close to PewDiePie in terms of views. And then if you look at the stuff that our YouTube channel farsight on YouTube we have 76,000 subscribers something in that neighborhood but our views typically are from 6000 to 25 30,000 in that realm.
We have a few that are a few hundred thousand but it's sort of in that same realm. What I'm basically pointing out is since the media is so heavily controlled, even when you put out a good product, even when you do something really great, you don't get visibility. I can look also at your stuff Rex, you put out a really good show. I mean, you put out stuff that is not covered in the mainstream and you have really interesting stuff.
I'm glad to be on your show because your show is really a good show. You put out interesting stuff. But I can also say you don't compete either with PewDiePie or Michelle FAM on makeup tutorials or CNN or Know. So and the real question is, given the amazing level of control that is exerted over the media, where the only things that really get through are sort of ridiculous things and PewDiePie is sort of on the ridiculous thing being wild and crazy antics but also superficial things.
Michelle FAM, for example, they both have really nice YouTube channels, I'm not criticizing them, but makeup tutorials, things that are not really essential. And then if you look at Instagram, 98% of Instagram is soft porn, meaning people trying to look good, fancy skimpy clothing and then dancing. And then TikTok is really people just jumping around and making dancing stuff, but nothing really serious. I should make the point, however, that in China, their version of TikTok is very different than our version of TikTok, and they don't allow all that stuff.
Their version of TikTok is all educational, which is interesting. The Chinese are basically we're not going to dumb down our kids, so they don't allow that anyway. But that's one of the problems that we're facing, that you can see this level of media control, not just affecting UFO and disclosure extraterrestrial stuff, but it seeps into all avenues of information distribution. So that even when people have a very good product, as example by The Hill and Breaking Points, it's hard for them to break through, it's hard for them to get the video coverage.
And when you have a great product like yourself, you do a great job. And it's important for the record. But you're not at the level of Michelle FAM or, you know, people that are doing antics of jumping around on Mean. They literally have millions of subscribers and stuff like that. So things that are ridiculous are allowed. The official dumb will allow that and they'll promote it. If you were jumping around half naked in TikTok, you'd probably have a few million subscribers, but they would allow that.
But for you to actually talk about the real extraterrestrial presence and the control that it has over our information sources, you can do that. They don't want to make it look like it's censorship. They finesse it. After millions of years, they know how to finesse this. They make it look by controlling the media access, they make it look like people are just not interested in it. But they control it in a very interesting way.
And when they do think something that is okay, that's harmless, like people jumping around half naked on Instagram, they will promote that. They will let that happen. Or on TikTok, they will let that happen. So it says, we have a free society. Look, there's a million people jumping around half naked on TikTok. How can you say we don't have a free society? Just that's right. So they give evidence of the reverse.
But the reality is the level of sophistication of the control is so extraordinarily well done. The propaganda effort is way better than what the Nazis did during the Weimar, during the Nazi period, during World War II, they had extreme control of the information. And whatever you're seeing now with the extraterrestrials is many, many thousands of times better, more fine tuned, more carefully crafted than what the Nazis did.
That level of control with the Nazis, it looked blunt, it looked brutal, it looked crude, but it was effective. This is not blunt, brutal, crude, but it's way more effective because it's so subtle you hardly see it. The main regular website has a ton of information and some access to a lot of our free projects is Farsight. org. Org. Because the Farsight Institute is a nonprofit, all of our major projects.
So that's like going to Disney's website and finding out everything that Disney's doing, you can find out there. But if you actually want to see all of the major shows that Disney comes out with, or Paramount Plus or Hulu or whatever, you have to go to their streaming service. And our streaming service is Farsightprime. com. So it's Farsight. org is our website, which that's a good place to get started.
All of our projects are nicely organized there. And then you have Farsightprime. com, which is a streaming service where we come out with all of our major projects. And so the project that's coming out in a week, secret space program, and the project that's coming out in five weeks, next month in October, middle of October, is on the Graze that'll all appear on Farsightprime. com. We have a new major project that comes out every single know.
And as well we have a news program called Et news, which is literally the news of what the extraterrestrials are up to, what they're doing. And we have about five major programs a month that come out. So people really get their money's worth and there's no other venues that show remote viewing stuff and full major projects. It's interesting because when you brought up how they've been doing this for millions of years, I've questioned that before.
I remember even 2030 years ago, I was thinking like planet killers, planet destroyers. The way that the whole economy is established, it seems like they know of these cyclical timelines and they milk these planets and these people and these civilizations as long as they can because they know when the reset is going to happen. And when I say reset, I mean I'm talking about like a global cataclysm or something that would literally take people back into the caves if they had to hide into the caves.
So, I mean, I'm really questioning these grays, though. And let me tell you, I've got friends and family that have been like I can't say one guy's name in particular, but he's got a very high level position and he's done a lot of top secret work. And he's talking about stuff off air where these things will come into his room and they will almost appear and then disappear, like Star Trek kind of stuff.
And it freaks him out. But he did tell me one time, he said they're absolutely physical. He says you can grab them. So it sounds to me like he actually grabbed one one time when it was trying to mess with him. But what are they? Because there's so many different stories. I've heard everything practically yeah, the issue is the issue is more complicated because there are so many different people with different levels of experience that you mentioned it in the beginning of the show that come at it from all different directions.
Bigfoot, whether they had experience looking at something they thought was bigfoot, or I was talking to some I was out doing UFO photography at a campsite, a national park a while back and people came over. This old guy came over, big beer belly. And he came over and sort of asked me what's going on and I sort of well, I said I had discussed what I'm doing and then he said, that's very interesting.
He went back and he had breakfast with his wife and so on. Then he came up to me afterwards and he you know, I just wanted to tell you I don't know if you want to tell me about this, but I just wanted to let you know that I bought a farm in Iowa just a little while back and I done seen Bigfoot. I'd done seen bigfoot. It was behind a tree when I was out there and I saw it behind a tree and it was staring at me and I was staring at it.
So you mentioned the stuff that you do with regard to UFOs and stuff like that, and immediately they associate it with something that's out on left field that they once saw or something like that. There's no coherency to it. There's no full body of information that people sort of put it in the context of. They have been exposed to so much disinformation that they don't know how to put your stuff in with everything else.
So they associate it with how they saw Bigfoot or how they were swimming and saw a ghostly image under the water one time, or how they were looking at the sky and they saw what looked like an angel come passing through them, or they woke up in the morning. They just come up with these stories about everything that you ever hear in the new age community because there's no coherency.
And the controlling powers want that exactly that's exactly what they want. They want everyone to be fragmented, everyone to be taking their own experiences and just sort of throwing it into the kitchen sink and making it look like a total mishmash. So that when you get people that are trying to present a coherent body of data david M. Jacobs, John Mack, myself, we're then going into a pool that has been heavily polluted and then you get the stuff coming out of the channeling community.
Actually, we can start talking about that with regard to our new projects that we're coming out with. But the stuff that's coming out of the channeling community is so incredibly well done in terms of propaganda outlets and it's coming through with people who are incredibly earnest, trustworthy, really great people. If someone's lying to you let's say you go to get a car, you go to a used car dealer, or you go to a car dealer of some type.
For example, I was looking for a van to purchase quite a lot many years ago. And I went to a dealership. I won't mention the dealership or the brand or anything, but I went to one and they had a whole bunch of vans. And then they had this guy I'm sorry to describe no names or anything, but the guy had a real strong limp in one eye, and he was an older guy with a real strong limp in one eye.
And he came up and he said, Can I help you? And I said, yeah, I'm looking for a van. Well, we have lots of vans here. Yeah, but I'm looking at these vans. And I had already known that I wanted front wheel drive. This is back in the old days when front wheel drive and a modern van I looked at him and I said, yeah, but I'm looking at these things and these look like rear wheel drive vans.
And he looked at me and he said with his one eye and he said, that's right. Rear wheel drive. Like, that was a really great, strong selling point. He was trying to sell me he was trying to sell me a van that I didn't want, didn't have the stuff I want. But he made it sound really great. I could have said, but there's a hole in the roof.
And he would have said, that's right, there's a hole in the roof. That's a really great hole in the roof. That's the best thing. And there's no extra charge for that. So it was like the information that you have being thrown at you with the whole disclosure stuff is so off the wall and covering so many different realms and so much basic blatant lying. But unlike the car salesman, where I could see he had the perfect look, a limp, one eye coming.
It was very easy not to believe. It was very easy for me to say, this is a car dealer salesman right out of the movies, and he's trying to pull the wool over my eyes, and that's not the van I want. It was easy to see that with the Channeling community, it's the reverse. Those people are really good. They're vivacious, they're enthusiastic, they love the fact that they're trying to make a difference.
They're truthful, they're earnest, and they come across that way, and then you have the information coming through them being total propaganda. You can't see it very easily as propaganda. It's not obvious. Like with that one eyed, limpy car salesman, it was these with the Channeling community is much different. So we have a project coming out in about a week called the Secret Space Program. And that's really super interesting.
And I can tell you now that the project we're giving out, that's a month later than that is on the Graze, which is really interesting because I can talk about it now because all the remote viewing is done, it's all recorded. The paper sessions actually it's done on iPads, they're done. And all of the video recordings of the final sessions are done. So it's all locked and sealed and delivered.
So if that wasn't done, I couldn't talk about it publicly. But with the secret space program, look at it this way, it should not be in dispute by anyone who's looking at this that the US government has real extraterrestrial spacecraft, crashed ships as well as intact ships. And then this is the thing I asked you last time I was on your show. What do you think the government, military people are doing with those ships? Do you think they had their troops surrounding the ships and they started campfire and they all sing Kumbaya? No, that's not what's going to happen.
The generals are going to say, I want those things reverse engineered. I want those things, I want us to have those things as well. And they put a huge amount of the black budget military stuff, which is the largest section of the entire military budget, meaning the largest section of the entire military budget. You don't have any idea where it's going. Given the huge level of military spending, the largest chunk of it, there is no background, there's no traceable.
You don't know where it's going. And a lot of people, even in Congress, they don't know where it's going. It's just like black. No one knows about it. It's done. So they would want their own versions of these spaceships. Now they've had a number of decades since the old Roswell crash to work on this. Plus they have signed agreements, as Said Bachayim Bashed, former head of the Israeli Space Directorate, that there's cooperative relationships with certain groups of extraterrestrials to help them with the tech.
So you can assume that by this time they have their own versions of those spaceships. They have figured out how the propulsion system works, how things are powered and so on like that. So if you do that, the last thing a military is going to want to do is to publicize that they're absolutely nonstop, no questions asked, not going to have a press release that tells people about that.
They're not going to use any of those ships, any of that tech, in any military confrontation unless it's an absolute desperate thing. But they're definitely not going to be shipping any of that technology to the Ukraine war. You're not going to see it. You're not going to see them flying that stuff together with the Blue Angels in the jets. You're not going to see any of that tech.
As far as they're concerned, the tech will not exist. And by holding back on whether the extraterrestrials actually exist, they're then preventing the next question is, well, if they do exist, and The Ships exist. The next question is, where is our version of those ships? Check this out. I am super stoked about this. We are Pivoting and we are going to offer you exclusive content, ad free, uncensored on patreon.
There's a whole bunch of stuff that I've wanted to talk about for the past few years that I haven't been able to really talk about, and now I'm going to talk about it. We're going to talk about it on Patreon. You can watch it on Patreon and you can sign up for as little as a buck. So check us out. Ad free. You're going to love it. Be the change you want to see and see at Patreon.
You. It. It. .
