Nephilim Infrastructure 7762 miles long

➡ Timothy Elbrino believes that ancient megalithic structures worldwide are connected by underground tunnels and possibly built by giants. These structures, made with large stones fitted together without cement, suggest advanced knowledge and technology. Despite some structures seeming to accommodate giants, many are built for normal-sized people, suggesting they were not dwellings but sacred sites or observatories. Elbrino also suggests these sites were used for tracking celestial bodies and making astronomical calculations.
➡ Ancient knowledge about cyclical disasters was only shared with the elite, like priests and nobles, not common people. This knowledge was taught by a group of secret keepers known as the great almautas. The speaker agrees with the idea that a highly advanced ancient civilization was nearly wiped out by a major disaster, but some survived. They believe the Bible, specifically Noah’s flood and the Book of Enoch, provides a more detailed account of this event.

This is Timothy Elbrino, and you are watching End Times Productions. I think that a lot of the important megalithic complexes around the world are connected by underground tunnels. I think that goes for Egypt, the megaliths in Egypt, in various parts of Europe, in the Middle East, and certainly in South America. I think that this is the norm. I think there’s a lot of hidden structures beneath these megalithic edifices. Certainly, it could be more megalithic constructions under the ground, or it could be galleries. It could be caverns. It could be all kinds of tunnels that go different places and connect the complexes to other complexes.

In some cases, maybe even hundreds or thousands of miles away. There’s something very interesting going on, I think, in the subterranean context of these megalithic sites. Nobody knows who built the megaliths, but we do know that they were all using the same technique, which is referred to today by archaeologists as cyclopean masonry. The cyclopean style involves large stones, sometimes square or rectangular, sometimes polygonal, that are fitted together so precisely that there’s no need for a bonding agent. There’s no need for cement or mortar. This kind of masonry is advanced. It’s exceedingly advanced. It’s not something that is easily accomplished, especially with stones that weigh sometimes in excess of 100 tons, sometimes in excess of 300 tons.

These kinds of cyclopean megaliths are found all over the Earth, and I think what it suggests is that either we’re looking at the same builders or we’re looking at different cultures who are using the same technology, who had the same knowledge, and it’s very ancient. It’s much more ancient than the Inca, and I think it’s much more ancient than the Egyptians. I think we’re looking at a technology, we’re looking at knowledge that originates in the antidiluvian world. So the question is who built them, and that’s the question that nobody knows. There’s people out there who pretend to know, but they don’t.

Nobody knows. It’s a complete mystery, and there are many possibilities. Of course, one of the most tantalizing possibilities is that the megaliths were built by giants, and I think that there’s some truth to that. Certainly, if you talk to the Quechua people in Peru and you ask them, who built the megaliths, who built these massive stone walls, these massive stone foundations that you see in the Andes, many of them will say the giants built them. They were built by giants. So there may be some truth to that. Certainly wouldn’t surprise me. However, that cannot be the only explanation.

Even if that’s part of the explanation, it cannot be the only explanation. Because some of the megalithic sites around the world and in Peru are not built to the proportions of giants. They’re not built proportionally to the stature of gigantic people. The doorways are small. The interiors of some of these megalithic constructions would not accommodate nine, ten, eleven, twelve, up to fifteen foot giants. They’re made for normal, they’re made for people of normal stature, common stature. That’s apparent when you look at the corridors, the doorways. However, there are some exceptions. Sacsayhuaman being one of them. If there’s one megalithic construction that I’ve seen, I’ve seen more than a few around the world, that I would be willing to concede could have been built for giants, it would be Sacsayhuaman.

Because the doorways of Sacsayhuaman are very large. They could accommodate nine foot tall giants. The stairwells are broad and the stairs themselves seem to be spaced for people with a very long stride. Yeah, the native people were very diminutive. I mean, the Inca themselves were not very tall. I take that back. The Inca, the nobility of the Inca were tall. But the Andean people who they subjugated were of very short stature. So Sacsayhuaman, in regard to its dimensions, in regard to the doorways themselves and the corridors and the steps, yeah, I mean, those could accommodate people of unusually large stature.

But if you are confronted with a megalithic site that has narrow corridors, that has small doorways, then obviously it wasn’t built for giants. Maybe built by giants, but not for giants. I’ve explored many of the megalithic towers in Sardinia, for example, which are known as the Nudagi. Although they incorporate really large stones, they’re not as finely dressed as the stones in Peru and other places around the world. They’re crude. They’re crude megalithic stones, but they’re still fitted without mortar. In other words, they’re still employing the Cyclopean technique. But these towers, and they’re very large towers, many of the towers were over 100 feet tall.

Although they incorporate large stones, although they’re very tall, the corridors are nearer. The doorways and the corridors are nearer. And me, I’m 6’1″, I would have to squeeze into some of these corridors. Certainly they were not broad enough for, you know, even an NBA player. You know, his head would be hitting the ceiling, his shoulders might be scraping up against the walls. So you have to keep that in mind. Granted, the Nuragi towers in Sardinia were probably built in a post-flood context. I don’t believe those are Antedeluvian. I think that the megaliths in Sardinia were built by the descendants of the Nephilim, by the various tribes of giants that were inhabiting the Levant, and very likely the island of Sardinia and other areas of the Mediterranean, in a post-flood context.

In other words, after the aqueous cataclysm described in the biblical text, these were the giants inhabiting the world after the flood of Noah. So if they were building these megalithic constructions in Sardinia, they weren’t building them for themselves. Because who would build an edifice that was not proportional to their own stature, that was not accommodating to their size? None of us would do that. I don’t think we should be thinking about megalithic edifices, complexes around the world as dwellings. I think it’s much more appropriate to think of them as sacred sites, temples, but when I say temples, I mean places where observations were being made, astronomical observations, places that were used for ritualistic purposes.

So it is very possible that these megalithic edifices were constructed perhaps by giants, by some of them, but not for giants, not to house giants, not as habitations for giants, but rather as observatories, or as I said before, as ritualistic sites for the practicing of various rituals related to astrology, related perhaps to sorcery, astrology, things like this. It’s black magic. No, it’s black magic. It’s demonic. When I was in Sardinia some years ago, I was actually accompanied by Anselm, and we were touring one of the large megalithic towers, one of the large Nuragi towers in Sardinia, and we noticed that on the outskirts of the tower, you have the primary tower, and then all around the tower you have smaller edifices, these little circular rooms, and archaeologists think that they serve different functions, and I’m sure they did, but one thing that we observed was in some of these rooms, you had a stone, and then on top of the stone you had a stone basin, so you had like a pedestal and a stone basin, and then around the stone basin you had an area where people could sit, and I don’t recall what the explanations of the archaeologists were for this, but Anselm and I immediately recognized this as an ancient device that was used for making observations, celestial observations, in other words tracking stars and tracking various celestial phenomena.

So what happens is that these basins are filled with water, and the structure would have an opening in the top, so that you would have an opening to the sky, and if they’re positioned to track a particular star, to mark a particular star, when that star is positioned directly over the basin, there’s a flash of light. At the zenith, when that star is directly over the basin, there’s a momentary flash of light, and then the astrologer, the astronomer, could make an accurate calculation in regard to the position of the star, and these are used all over the world.

They’re certainly used in Peru and in fact at Machu Picchu. And so when Anselm and I saw these stone basins on these pedestals and these what look like astronomical observatories, we instantly made this connection between these sites in Sardinia and the ones that are very similar to these in Peru at Machu Picchu. So very clearly, the Nuragi towers have some sort of an astronomical function related to astrology, related to making accurate calculations about the movement of celestial bodies, and so I presume therefore that megaliths in general, probably some of them at least, had this very same function.

They were functional edifices. They weren’t just citadels, they weren’t just built for defensive purposes, and they weren’t just temples in the sense that they were places of worship, rather they had a function. And they were built for a very specific reason related to, again in many cases, astronomy. What were they looking for? What were they looking for? They must have been looking for something. I mean, why else would they be doing this? Yeah, we know ancient cultures all over the world were tracking the precession of equinox and were basically keeping the same timepiece, which is the zodiac.

We know that, many ancient cultures around the world. And this was done for many purposes. I mean, for one thing, what they were tracking was cyclic cataclysm. And this knowledge was not proliferated among the masses, among the vulgar. It was only kept by the initiated, by the priest class and the noble class. This was the knowledge that they would be trained in. The young nobles, for example, in Peru, those who were of the royal blood, of the ink of blood, were trained by a class of very mysterious teachers who were called the grandes almautas.

And the great almautas is basically what they were called. And the great almautas were the keepers of secret knowledge, were the keepers of ancient knowledge that was conveyed, relayed to the Inca nobility. And so that knowledge, I believe, is fragments of knowledge that was preserved from the anti-Glubian world. I appreciate Graham Hancock and his research. I’ve read many of his books. First and foremost, he’s a very eloquent writer. I really enjoy his prose. And for the most part, I agree with his thesis that there was a highly advanced ancient civilization that once existed on Earth, that for whatever reason, probably due to some cataclysmic event or a series of cataclysmic events, was nearly annihilated, but that there were some survivors.

I mean, I generally agree with that thesis. Although I believe that a more accurate accounting of that very event, that cataclysmic event, is to be found in the pages of the Bible and more specifically in the account of the flood of Noah and then also in the book of Enoch. And I would say a much more detailed explanation is the one provided in the Enochian text. First Enoch. Thank you, Tim. Thank you, Tim. And thank you everyone for being here. Now thank you all for coming out, and we’ll see you next time.

God bless you all. God bless you all. God bless you all. [tr:trw].