Real Demonic Bodies Found Undergound

➡ A significant archaeological discovery has been made, involving non-human species that lived alongside the Nazca Parakas people 1200 years ago. These beings, found in Peru, were buried in the same way as the Nazca Parakas, suggesting interaction between them. The discovery includes three-fingered mummies of varying sizes, some of which are believed to have been living, breathing entities. This finding could potentially rewrite history and raises questions about the existence of such creatures in other parts of the world.
➡ DNA from elongated skulls found in Peru suggests that the people they belonged to were not native to the Americas, but migrated from Europe, Central Asia, or the Middle East. These people, part of the Paracas culture, had distinct features like elongated skulls, large eyes, small noses, and puckered lips. Scientists have extensively studied these mummies, using MRI scans, X-rays, and DNA analysis, and believe they were real, living beings, not fakes. The mummies, dated between 1000 and 1500 years ago, have a mix of human and unknown DNA, with some features more similar to reptiles than humans.
➡ The text discusses the discovery of unusual mummies with reptile-like features and metallic implants, some made of a rare alloy called oseum. The author suggests these beings, which are genetically and anatomically different from humans, might have been alive around 1200 years ago and could have interbred with the Paracas culture in Peru, possibly resulting in a noble class with naturally elongated skulls. Despite initial skepticism and accusations of hoax, the author believes the complexity and number of these mummies make it unlikely they are fake. The origin of these beings is speculated to be either extraterrestrial or crypto terrestrial, meaning they could be hidden inhabitants of the Earth.
➡ The article discusses the discovery of mummified beings, possibly from ancient cultures like the Parakas or Nazca, which may not be hoaxes but real, non-human creatures. The author suggests that these beings, found intricately mummified, could have lived alongside humans, requiring a rewrite of history. The evidence, including CT scans, X-rays, and genetic analysis, is compelling and publicly available, leading many scientists to believe in their authenticity. The author also mentions the discovery of large underground tunnels in Peru, where these beings might have been found, and speculates about the existence of an underground city inhabited by such creatures.

This is the most important discovery in human history, archaeological discovery in human history. Nothing even comes close. We’re talking about a non human species that was living contemporaneously with the Nazca Parakas people and that were buried in the manner of those cultures, which means they were interacting with them. That, that demands a rewriting of history, at least in that this part of the world. And if these creatures are living, were living and breathing in Paracas 1200 years ago, then who’s to say they weren’t living and breathing in ancient Egypt or Mesopotamia, or aren’t still living and breathing under the ice in Antarctica? And in fact, the legends in Peru regarding the Chinkana, the legends of the Quechua and the Aymara people regarding the Chinkana, is that there is a race of non human beings inhabiting it.

So it’s not beyond the pale to wonder if these things are still alive and if there’s some sort of underground city beneath the Andes. This is Timothy Albrino and you are watching End Times Productions. So I recently returned from an expedition in Peru. Part of the reason why I went down there was because I was invited by Professor Roger Zuniga from the University of Ica to come and examine the so called tridactyl beings, these three fingered mummies that are in the possession of the university. And I accepted the invitation and I traveled to Ica. Ica is in the desert.

It’s kind of between Paracas and Nazca, the Palpa area. And it’s an extreme desert. I mean, it looks like the surface of Mars. It’s a very interesting environment. And because it’s so dry, it’s one of the driest places in the world. You have extraordinarily well preserved mummies and desiccated bodies. And it’s really desiccated bodies more than mummies. So this is where you find in the Paracas Ica, Palpa region of Peru. This is where you find a lot of the mummies, the Paracas mummies and the Nazca mummies and the Paracas mummies. When you find Paracas mummies, again, desiccated bodies is the correct term because a mummy is wrapped in, preserved in a different way.

A desiccated body is. The flesh is just dried. It’s almost like you dehydrate the body. But it’s much easier to refer to them as mummies than desiccated bodies. So if I say mummy, just understand these are not technically mummies, but these desiccated bodies are preserved so well. So if you find mummies related to the Nazca or Paracas culture, oftentimes you’re going to find them in the fetal position and they’re going to be wrapped in burial bundles, they’re going to be encased in burial bundles. And burial bundles are multiple layers of fabric and inside the fabric is this mummy in the fetal position.

And grave robbers often look for these burial bundles because it’s, it’s, it’s the nobility that’s buried in this fashion. And the nobility of course is sometimes associated with all kinds of artifacts, including gold and silver and, and other artifacts that can be sold on the black market. So you have, you have grave robbers, Juaqueros they’re called in Peru, who are always out there in the desert looking for these desiccated remains. And it happened that some years ago there’s the origins of the tridactyl beings. The three fingered mummies are convoluted. I’ve heard several different stories, but one of the stories is that years ago, maybe seven, eight years ago, maybe 10 by now, some grave robbers discovered a cavern or a cave or a tunnel in which 153 fingered mummies had been buried.

And these, these extracted some of these mummies and they sold them to various individuals. Ultimately the University of ICA was able to acquire four. And they’re not all the same. Some of these three fingered mummies are very small, they’re like one to two feet tall, some of them are quite large and they’re in the fetal position. Just like the Paracas desiccated bodies or the Nazca desiccated bodies, they’re in that fetal position and they were discovered in mummy bundles. I was told by some of the professors at the university. Although remember the origins convoluted. I’ve heard other stories and I think I’ve heard the real story, which probably won’t publicize just yet.

But understand that many of these things were discovered. Some are small, some are large, they look different. The similarity is that they have three fingers. The small ones and the large ones look different. And so when I went to the University Inika, I examined these mummies and I approached the large one first and it was in a case, it was in a glass case. And I was immediately struck with the sensation, let’s say that this thing was living and breathing at some time in the past. Now I don’t have any scientific reason to believe that that was in fact the case.

It was just my initial reaction when I walked up to this mummy and I, you Have to understand, I have a firewall up. When it pertains to Central and South America, I have a art. Let’s say this again, when it pertains to artifacts from Central and South America, I have a firewall up because there’s a lot of fake stuff circulating. There’s a lot of fake artifacts. I’ve been exposed to a lot of fake artifacts. I understand the way the markets work and a lot of gringos are buying these artifacts, thinking they’re real. It’s a whole industry and there’s a lot of money to be made.

So. And it’s, it’s rampant in Central and South America, especially artifacts related to aliens, you know, alien artifacts. I’ve got a firewall. Most of that stuff is fake. And so I’m very incredulous and I refrained from commenting on these tridactyl desiccated bodies, these three fingered mummies, for a very long time because I didn’t really want to comment on them until I had the opportunity to examine them up close in person. But like I said, when I walked up to the larger body, which is called Maria, which the university has, Maria Mario they call it now, my first impression was I think this is, I think this is real.

I think this was a living breathing entity. Now at the university, they have Maria, which is the larger mummy, and then they have the smaller ones, you know, those, the ones that were featured by Jaime Masan, the Mexican ufologist Jaime Massan. A couple years ago or a year ago, he had this press briefing which went viral on the Internet because he unveiled, there were members of the Mexican Congress there. He unveiled the alien bodies there. Right? The little ones that are two feet tall, they have three fingers and the university had two of those. And I did not get the same impression from the small ones as I did from the large one.

The anatomy of the large mummy, the larger moment. I call it a larger mummy because although it’s in the fetal position, if that thing were to stand up, you know, it would be typical stature of the natives In Peru, probably 5, 6, 7 something somewhere around 5, 6, 5, 7 maybe. You have to understand that, you know, because it’s dried out, it is shrunk. The anatomy of Maria, the larger mummy looks functional to me. There’s no red flags, at least my initial observations were where this looks like functional anatomy to me. Even the way that the three fingered hands and the three fingered toes and these are very long fingers, even the way that the bones connect to the wrists and to the ankles, it seems very natural that the anatomical flow seems very functional to me, whereas the smaller ones, they seem very rigid and I don’t get the same feeling.

The anatomy seems off. Now, I’m not a professional. I don’t work with human anatomy. You know, I’m not. I’m not a doctor, I’m not a forensic scientist. These are just my, you know, as a layperson, my initial observations. But the small ones, they just don’t look like they had function. They have functional anatomy. They don’t look like they were living and breathing at some time. They. They look very rigid and the joints don’t. They just look off to me. I can’t imagine those things having flesh on them and walking around and actually functioning as living beings.

One of them is in a seated position. It’s missing its head. It’s in the seated position again. It’s very rigid. They’re very rigid, the little ones. So understand that these are distinct from the larger ones. Their facial structure is totally different. The small desiccated bodies have a flat face and they look like. They look like the aliens from the. The Steven Spielberg movie. I can’t recall the title of it, but they look exactly like that. E.T. phone home free Jing E.T. please phone home. Phone home. And just unrealistic as far as I’m concerned. But let’s return to the larger mummy, Maria.

Maria has some anatomical oddities that are highly intriguing to me. For example, she has an elongated skull. And I’ve done an extensive investigation into the elongated skulls of Paracas, and most people are familiar with those. They’re all over the Internet. I’ve held them, I’ve analyzed them. We even did a genetic analysis from one of the skulls which yielded some very surprising results. We were able to get mitochondrial DNA from one of those elongated Paracus elongated skulls. And the DNA indicates haplogroup M, which is interesting because haplogroup M has a wide distribution in Europe, in Central Asia, the Middle east and other places.

But zero, no distribution in the Americas. It is not represented at all in the Americas. It’s like one of the only places where you don’t find haplogroup M is precisely the haplogroup of this elongated skull, which indicates that these people migrated from over the sea, they came from somewhere else to the shores of Peru, at least members of the Paracas culture, or there was a culture that migrated and interbred with a native culture and that resulted in the Paracas culture. Of course, Elie Marsoulli did a phenomenal analysis, a much more extensive analysis of the elongated skulls in regard to the genetics, they did a genetic analysis with Mondo Gonzalez was involved in that, Chase Koletsky and others, and that was led by my colleague Elaine Marsulli.

And they also were able to determine that the, the haplogroups of the elongated. The Paracus elongated skulls, the haplogroups were not. Some of the haplogroups did indicate indigenous populations in South America, but many of the haplogroups indicated Middle East, Europe, Central Asia and so forth. So that just reinforces the idea that there was a migration and an interbreeding. And the reason why I’m talking about this is because it’s going to be relevant to these. In my opinion, we’re going to have some relevance here to the tridactyl beings. The tridactyls have the elongated skulls, just like the Paracas culture, just like that.

And there are several of these larger tridactyles. I think there’s seven, eight, maybe up to a dozen of them that are known and many more that are unknown. And some of them have more accentuated elongated skulls. Maria’s skull is slightly elongated, but it is elongated. So that’s an oddity. But the most striking anomaly, anatomical anomaly, are her overly large orbital sockets, like really, really large eyes. And she has these eyelids that are, that are divided in the middle. And so she has these large eyelids with clearly very large eyelids, very large eyes and very, very small nose.

And something that a lot of people don’t realize about at least Maria, if not all of these larger specimens is they have puckered lips. And the way that the professors explained it to me was that their lips are puckered in the way that chimpanzee lips are puckered or gorilla lips. So this is a freakish being. Okay, assuming that this thing was alive and breathing sometime in the distant past, you would have had this elongated skull. And by the way, they don’t have ears. Elongated skull, no ears, gigantic eyes, barely a nose, and puckered lips. That’s what these things would have looked like.

And obviously, most bizarrely of all, these three fingers and three toes, very long three fingers and three toes. Very strange indeed. But as I said, the anatomy of these large mummies seems to flow very naturally. They do not look like they’re composites. In fact, the reason why I’m even interested in these mummies is because there has been extensive scientific analysis. They’ve been subjected to extensive scientific analysis, and the data is, is, has been published freely online. Nobody’s hiding the results. And there have been several scientific teams that have come to investigate these. These mummies, the small ones and the large ones.

There was an American team that was associated with Jaime Massan, who came and they were led by John McDowell, a celebrated forensic investigator. And they did MRI scans, X ray, DNA analysis. I don’t know the extent of all of the testing that McDowell’s team did, but the combination of all of these different teams that have. That have analyzed the mummies have accrued all of this kind of data. Again, mri, X ray DNA analysis and other tests and other analyses besides. And universally, if you read the data and you listen to the opinion of the scientists who have examined these mummies, they all say the same thing.

Now, before I say what they say, understand that McDowell, he was not given access to the small ones. He only analyzed the large ones and what they say. So let’s be specific to the large mummies. The universal conclusion about the large mummies is that they’re not fake. In other words, when they say they’re not fake, what they mean is that there’s nothing in the anatomy of these mummies that is, that doesn’t belong. There’s no epoxy, there’s no plastic, there’s no, you know, like, metal wiring. There’s nothing there that doesn’t belong. All that’s there is tissue and bone, you know, sinew and bone.

That’s it. And skin. So there’s nothing out of place in the anatomy. Furthermore, they all attest the fact that the anatomy is natural. It seems to be natural. The way that the wrists, the way that the hands connect to the wrists. As I said, which was my initial observation as a layperson, the way that the feet connect to the ankles has a natural anatomical flow. The scientists, especially the American scientists, are not willing to say these things were alive and breathing, but they are willing to say they’re not fake. And they suspect that they might have been alive and breathing at one time based on the anatomy.

And that’s what I’m willing to say at this point. I suspect that the large ones might very well have been alive and breathing. They might have been sucking air on planet Earth at some point in the distant past, walking around. They’ve been carbon dated to between a thousand and, I think, 1500 years ago. I think that’s the time frame that these various mummies fall in. Somewhere 1200 years more or less ago, which puts them squarely in the timeframe of the Procas culture. I find that to be very intriguing. And one of the most interesting things that Dr.

Zuniga told me was that the DNA analysis across the board was indicating 30% human DNA, 70% anomalous. And Zuniga highlighted the fact that human beings have more, genetically speaking, have more in common with a papaya than with these tridactyl beings. We share about 40% of our DNA with a papaya, according to Dr. Zuniga. So that’s very interesting. And when we talk about anomalous DNA, we’re talking about DNA that does not conform to any kind, to any known creature on planet Earth. It’s anomalous, it’s unknown. Zuniga and his colleagues at the University of Ica are unequivocally convinced that these mummies are real in the sense that they were living and breathing.

Including the small ones. Including the small ones. Now, I, again, my initial observation is, I’m persuaded at this point, based on my initial observation of these desiccated bodies, that although I do believe the large ones very well could have been living, breathing beings, I am not persuaded that the small ones were living, breathing beings. I think, and I, and I always reserve the right to change my mind. It’s just my sense. And again, this isn’t based on the data, because the professors in Peru will tell you that the data indicates that they’re all real in that sense.

They were all living at some point in the distant past, you know, about 1200 years ago. But my sense is that these smaller mummies are effigies of the larger ones and that they were buried with the larger ones for some sort of ritualistic purpose. So they’re like. You can think of them maybe as ancient dolls. They’re effigies, they’re facsimiles of the larger ones. If that’s the case, then they’re composites of different kinds of animals, replicas of the larger ones. That’s just my. As I keep saying, that’s just my impression. Now, when I came home from Peru, I pulled up some interviews by Dr.

McDowell, and I was very interested to discover that that’s his opinion as well. He is leaning in the direction based on interviews. I listened to him, I listened to. Of him. He seems to be persuaded also that although he thinks there’s a very strong possibility the large ones are real in the sense that they were living beings, the small ones appear to be dolls or effigies. So they drew this. The American, at least the guys from the American team drew the same conclusion. Now, it’s possible that the small ones are real in that sense as well, that they were Also living.

It’s very possible, again, Zuniga and his colleagues are totally convinced that they’re all real, all 150 of them are real. And I asked him to describe some of the anatomical anomalies of both the large specimens and the small ones. And he rattled off. He began to rattle off just a very impressive list of oddities. And the beings are humanoid, generally speaking, they’re humanoid, they’re bipedal. But a lot of the bones and the positions of the bones and the musculature and the skin is totally, totally divergent. It’s totally different than the human species. The skin, he was telling me, is much more reptilian than human.

It seems to be textured like a lizard. Basically. The configuration of the rib cage, the configuration of the neck, and. And some of the other skeletal structure of the anatomy is quite different than ours. So it’s not just that they’re a little different than us. As he said, they’re only at most, 30% similar to us, genetically speaking, and somewhat similar to us, anatomically speaking. They’re bipedal. It’s been discovered that some of the specimens have eggs, literally eggs like a reptile. And the contents of the eggs have been tested, and all of that is online, and it appears to be organic.

One of the most compelling. One of the most compelling aspects of. Of these mummies is that some of them have metallic implants. Some of the smaller mummies have metallic implants in the chest. One of the larger mummies, at least one of the larger mummies, has a metallic implant right in the center of its forehead. And these implants are made of gold. And at least one of them has a very rare alloy. It’s called oseum. And ocium is relatively new in regard to our understanding of ocm. And it has a very limited use. Its utility is very limited, at least in the modern world.

And we only use it, as far as I know, in communication devices. And I think. I’m pretty sure, and I could be wrong about this, but I don’t know that oseum has ever been discovered in any other ancient artifact. But it’s one of the alloys in these metal implants, or at least in some of them. So what’s that doing there? That’s very bizarre. And something about these implants that, again, I find very compelling is that Dr. Zuniga described to me how the bone and the sinew have clearly grown over the implants, which indicates that. That they were implanted while this thing was alive, resulting in the bone that’s the only way that the bone would grow over the implants.

So that I find that very compelling. Now, I’m not a scientist, but I was impressed by. By how knowledgeable and honest and sincere Dr. Zuniga was. And he wasn’t aggressively trying to convince me that these things were real. He was really. He’s really just fascinated by them. I mean, that’s what he conveyed to me. He was. He was genuinely fascinated, awestruck by these tridactyl beings. And he told me that he is persuaded by the data. He can’t argue with the data. And because I asked him, I pressed him on this, I said, do you really think the little ones are real? I mean, their anatomy is so bizarre.

It doesn’t seem functional to me. You know, what do I know? But as a casual observer, the anatomy of the little ones doesn’t seem functional to me. And he said, I know, I know, but all of the data indicates that they’re real. And I can’t argue with the data. That’s what he told me. He said, I have to acquiesce to the data. So I asked him what the response of the Ministry of Culture in Peru has been. And initially it was very hostile. The Ministry of Culture was convinced that these were fakes, hoaxes. And there was an incident in which three of the smaller desiccated bodies were confiscated in the airport.

And what I’ve been told, and I believe this is, is a proven fact at this point, is that the bodies that were confiscated, at first, the press made a big deal about this in Peru and said somebody was trying to smuggle out these artifacts from Peru, and they were found to be hoaxes. And that disproves all of the rest of the 150 mummies. See, their hoaxes, I mean, and they were clearly. They were clearly not real. I mean, they were hoaxes. They were composites of different creatures. And I think there was epoxy in them. And. But it later was proven, as far as I know.

This is what I was told in Peru, that those. And in fact, the person who was in possession of these artifacts admitted that they were facsimiles. In other words, they were models based on the actual mummies. And so the conspiracy theory is that the Ministry of Culture orchestrated this confiscation at the airport to disprove the authenticity of the mummies. Case closed. C. We dissected them. They’re fake. They’re all fake. Right. That somebody wanted to disprove the authenticity of the other mummies. So it seems to me that there’s some credibility to that story. I was told by the professors in Peru that that had happened.

So if in fact the confiscation of these fake alien mummies, three fingered mummies, was orchestrated by the Ministry of Culture or somebody else, then that that lends credibility to the authenticity of the mummies of the real ones. So these are my initial thoughts. I again I reserve the right to change my mind. I am convinced that the larger mummies, Maria and her like, were alive at some point in the distant past, namely circa 1200 years ago. And I do believe that they are related to the Paracas elongated skulls. My hypothesis is that assuming that these tridactyl beings were alive and breathing during the time when the Paracas culture was flourishing in Peru, that they were interbreeding with the Paracas culture with members, individuals from the Paracas culture and that resulted in the Paracas nobility with the elongated skulls.

Now understand that many, perhaps most of the elongated skulls in Paracas, the Paracas elongated skulls are in fact the result of cranial deformation. Let me say that again. They are the result of cradle head boarding and head binding. Artificial cranial deformation is the correct explanation for the majority of the elongated skulls. However, I am persuaded that the noble class, that the elongation of their skulls, which is much more accentuated, they have much larger craniums, is the result of a genetic variation. It’s a genetic anomaly. In other words, it’s natural. I’m convinced that fetuses, I’ve seen evidence that fetuses have been discovered with elongated skulls.

And if that’s true, it’s case closed because you can’t cradle headboard a fetus in the womb. So if you have fetuses or really, really young newborn babies with elongated skulls, then you’re looking at a genetic, the product of a genetic variation. So again, assuming that the tridactyls were real and assuming that some of the elongated skulls, namely of the Paracas nobility, are the result of a genetic alteration, then it seems reasonable to me to infer that there was interbreeding and that the product, the hybrid offspring of the tridactyl beings and the Paracas people would be a noble class among the Paracas with naturally elongated skulls and perhaps some other anatomical anomalies.

Odd. That’s ranked speculation. It’s just conjecture. But if, if the tridactyls are real, then I think it’s perfectly plausible. And I talked to Zuniga about this and he had never really considered that. He was only vaguely familiar with the Elongated skulls, the Procus elongated skulls, which I was a little bit surprised by that, seeing as he’s a professor at the University of ica. But he conceded that it’s possible. It’s possible that if they were living contemporaneously, and they were, that they might have been breeding, interbreeding. So what you’re talking about here is a crypto terrestrial species that is inhabiting the Earth concurrent with the practice culture to their contemporaries and is clearly interacting with the Parakas culture or the Nazca and.

Or the Nazca culture because they’re being buried in the fetal position, intentionally buried, and in some cases in the burial bundles. This indicates that they were alive, they died, and either the Parakas or the Nazca culture buried them in the manner of the Paracas and Nazca culture cultures, which means they were interacting with them. So the question is, what in the world are they and where do they come from? I suspect, assuming again that they’re real, I suspect that they’re subterranean. There is some indication that they could be aquatic, but I suspect they’re subterranean. And if they were alive 1200 years ago, could they still be alive today? Are there still specimens of this non human species alive today? Now, people are speculating all over the Internet and have been for the last seven years that these are aliens, that these are extraterrestrials.

They could be. That’s possible. But it’s just as possible that they’re crypto terrestrial. In other words, crypto terrestrial means that they are cryptically inhabiting the Earth, that they’re native to the Earth and they’re just hidden, they’re concealed, their existence is concealed from us. In other words, they’re living inside of the Earth, in the bowels of the Earth and caverns and tunnels and whatever, you know, underground cities maybe, or maybe they’re living under the oceans, who knows? I mean, the speculation is endless here. But I do want to make it clear that, that it is still possible that they’re hoaxes.

I think it’s very unlikely, because if they’re hoaxes, these are the. This is, this constitutes the greatest hoax in the history of archeology. This is certainly the most complicated, the most complex hoax ever perpetrated. If, in fact these mummies are hoaxes, I mean, the level of detail that went into them is unprecedented. And remember, there’s hundreds of them. So to me, it’s unlikely that they’re hoaxes. So that’s one possibility, that they’re hoaxes. And when I say hoax, what that means is they were purposely created to be sold or to be marketed to the world as if they’re real and with a financial incentive that’s a hoax.

It’s also possible that they’re real artifacts, but they weren’t real beings. What do I mean by that? It’s possible that in ancient cultures such as the Pakistanazka created these composite beings and buried them for some ritualistic purpose. That in other words, the mummies are real in regard to the. To the, to the parts involved in the composite. Right, but they weren’t living, breathing beings. That’s another possibility. I find that possibility to be more likely than the hoax. But in order for that to be true, you have to attribute a lot of skill to these, to the Parakas or Nazca people in creating these mummies.

I mean, this wasn’t a hack job. They’re very intricately. The joints and all of the various anatomical constituents are very, very precisely fitted together so that they look natural. I mean, how are ancient people accomplishing that? So that one also seems unlikely. So the hoax and the ancient artifact theory both seem less likely than these things were actually living creatures. That seems to be the simplest explanation here, at least as it pertains to the larger mummies. I’m not willing to go there with the smaller mummies. So it could turn out that the smaller mummies, as I keep saying were, are just as authentic as the larger ones.

It could turn out that they’re all hoaxes. I’m just conveying my initial observations here. It’s hard to argue with the data. It really is hard to argue with that much data that is freely available online. I mean, it’s published online. The CT scans, the X rays, the genetic analysis, it’s all public knowledge at this point. It’s all available to the public. So nobody’s attempting to hide any of the data. And that’s compelling. And it’s because of the data that all of the professors I talked to in EECA are persuaded that they’re totally authentic, totally real. And I was told that the Ministry of Culture is slowly coming around, slowly warming to the idea that these are in fact real, that these mummies were real, living, breathing creatures, precisely because the data is accumulating.

And at some point it’s going to become undeniable. It’s just a tsunami of data. Which doesn’t mean that they’re not hoaxes. I just want to put that out there. It doesn’t mean they’re not hoaxes. It just means it’s. Is Becoming less and less likely that these are hoaxes as the data accumulates. And what I’m conveying here, I think, is the general consensus of most of the scientists who’ve looked at these things. I don’t think anybody yet is willing to jump out and say these were living, breathing beings and we need to accept them as such. But as time goes by and more data is collected, everyone’s kind of moving in that direction, quietly and inevitably moving in that direction.

And let’s just be clear. I mean, if that’s the case, this is the. This is the most important discovery in human history. Archeological discovery in human history. Nothing even comes close. We’re talking about a non human species that was living contemporaneously with an Oscar Procus people and that were buried in the manner of those cultures, which means they were interacting with them. That demands a rewriting of history, at least in this part of the world. And if these creatures were living and breathing in Paracas 1200 years ago, then who’s to say they weren’t living and breathing in ancient Egypt or Mesopotamia, or aren’t still living and breathing under the ice in Antarctica or something like that? I mean, all bets are off.

We don’t really know and anything’s possible at that point. Could they be extraterrestrials? Certainly. Certainly they could be. I mean, they could be anything. Crypto terrestrial extraterrestrial. If they are real. There’s an interesting connection between the discovery of these tridactyl mummies and something I discovered in Peru. In 2019. We were in Peru working on a film project, myself, my partner Gary Haven, and our crew. And at the time, we were driving into the desert of Pisco, which is. You have the desert of Pisco, Paracas and Ica, the Palpa area. That’s generally. It’s generally the same area.

I mean, it’s the same sort of terrain. And we were driving from the city of Pisco to this lake called Lake Morone. And at the time, we were looking for treasure. We were filming a treasure hunt and we were looking for Inca treasure in the lake. And our route to and from the lake, we would pass an archeological site called the Chongos Necropolis. And the Chongos Necropolis, it’s not like a. It’s not a roped off archaeological site. It’s totally open and it’s. The main feature of the site is an adobe pyramid, a large adobe pyramid, and it’s in ruins, but it’s an adobe pyramid.

It’s pretty impressive. And I remember we were Driving to the lake, and I’m looking at the pyramid, and I had this intuition that there was something beneath it. And specifically, it was very specific. The intuition was that there was a tunnel beneath the pyramid. And I told my team, there’s a tunnel beneath that pyramid. We need to take our GPR unit out there and drone the pyramid. We did. Our GPR team went out there, they flew the drone around the pyramid, and we discovered not one, but two massive artificial tunnels 100ft beneath the Chongos pyramid. These tunnels are so large, you could drive a semi truck through them.

And all of this is featured in. In a film series that’s available in my community. If anybody wants to watch this, see the data, see us drone the site and see what we discovered, you can go over to my members community, and if you’re an annual subscriber, you get access to those films. And we have the 3D renderings of the tunnels through our GPR technology. And, I mean, they’re huge, and we have no idea how far they go, but they’re there. There’s two massive tunnels, and they’re sort of crisscrossing beneath the pyramid. And understand that the Chongos Necropolis, archaeologists believe that that was the center of the Pakistan culture.

So this was built by the Parakas people. And all around the Chongos Necropolis, you can find elongated skulls sticking out of the sand, sticking out of the desert floor, or fragments of elongated skulls with red hair. That’s one of the features of the Paracas people. They had red hair. And you find burial bundles or fragments of burial bundles all over the place and just shards of bones just laying everywhere. It’s a necropolis. It’s a. It’s a. Basically a graveyard. And we detected a bunch of burial bundles, by the way, around the necropolis during our scan, we could see the burial bundles, and we could see the mummies inside of them in the fetal position.

And so this is the Paracas culture. And I learned later on from a particular source, this individual. This individual likely is the guy who discovered the mummies. Not the Wakato, not the grave digger, but this other. This other guy that I’ve been interfacing with, he told me that in reality, the mummies were not discovered in a cavern or in a cave. They were discovered in a very large tunnel deep underground. And I told him about what we had discovered at Chongos. And he was intrigued, to say the least. And after communicating with him for a while, by the way, he has specimens in his own collection.

He has specimens himself that he’s been analyzing because he discovered them or was involved in the discovery of these mummies. He’s not told anybody where he’s actually discovered them. He’s put out misinformation so that nobody could go back and screw with the site, especially grave robbers or the Ministry of Culture. He’s kept it hidden. So he’s purposely ceded misinformation. This is what he told me. And he also told me that I explained to him, I expressed to him what my initial thoughts about these mummies and. And my hypothesis that this tridactyl species was interbreeding with the Paracas people.

And he was astounded because that is precisely what he believes. And furthermore, he believes that they’re subterranean and that they’re still alive. And he and I discussed a joint expedition into the desert to go down into the tunnels and thoroughly explore them. So that’s something that I very. Let me rephrase that. I got to be careful. Let’s just leave it there. So I find that very interesting. I think that I know that the tunnels exist. I know the tunnels exist. I detected them with my equipment. And if, in fact, these beings were discovered in one of these tunnels, these tunnels go somewhere.

Where do they go? Maybe they just connect, you know, the important cities, the Paracas and Nazca people. Or maybe they go to some kind of underground city. Maybe they connect to the Chinkana. And in fact, the legends in Peru regarding the Shinkana, the legends of the Quechua and the Aymara people regarding the Shinkana, is that there is a race of non human beings inhabiting it. So it’s not beyond the pale to wonder if these things are still alive and if there’s some sort of underground city beneath the Andes. Sam.
[tr:tra].