The New Pope and THE RETURN OF BABYLON

On May 8th, 2025, a new Pope was chosen, but some believe this event is more than just a leadership change. They suggest it’s part of an ancient spiritual war, with the Pope being a symbol of an old Babylonian priesthood, not just a Christian leader. Questions are raised about the quick selection process and the possible hidden meanings behind it. The author suggests that this could be a power move in anticipation of a coming storm, rather than a simple act of faith.
The text states that according to various Popes, including Pope Clement VI and Pope John XXIII, it is essential for everyone’s salvation to follow the Roman Church. They believe that those who oppose this faith and die without repenting will be damned. Even in recent times, Popes have maintained that forgiveness and salvation can only be achieved through the Pope, not directly from God.

It began with white smoke, just like it always does, but this time, beneath the surface of that familiar Vatican ritual, something far older was stirring. As I record this just a few minutes ago, May 8th, 2025, the world watched as the new pope was chosen. But, if you were paying attention, I mean really paying attention, you’d feel it in your bones, that this wasn’t just a new leader. This was a torch being passed down in a spiritual war that’s been raging since the Tower of Babel. The crowds gathered at St. Peter’s Square, as tradition played out.

Latin chants, bells, robes, rituals, however. Beneath the chants and the incense, something ancient is brewing. And some say something not Christian, but Babylonian in nature. Just like Alexander Hislop warned us in the book The Two Babylons, the Roman papacy isn’t simply a continuation of Peter’s mission. No, according to Hislop, it’s a resurrection of Babylon’s priesthood dressed in Christian robes. Now, that priesthood has crowned a new high priest, the new pope. They call it sacred, they call it holy, but according to Hislop, if you look deeper, the timing, the secrecy, the symbols, the uncanny urgency behind the matter, it’s all connected.

Because Pope Francis was just barely laid to rest, the conclave convened almost immediately. 133 cardinals locked in silence, moved by forces they’ll never name. Now, 133. Why did they choose 133 and not 132 or 34? Is there a connection with the 33 degrees of masonry here? I don’t know. Either it’s a coincidence or intentional. But some say this papal conclave was rushed. And if it was, why did they rush it? Why now? Why are they pushing so hard for this to happen immediately? And another question, why does this moment feel less like a coronation and more like an activation? An activation of some kind of plan? They say Habemus papum, but the smoke signals something else.

Something buried in prophecy. Something Babylonian reborn. They’ll tell you it’s the will of God, that the Holy Spirit guided the vote, but history tells a different story. A story preserves not in mainstream doctrine, but in suppressed books like the two Babylons. In this book, Alexander Hislop lays a chilling argument that the Roman Catholic system, the very structure of the papacy, is built on scaffolding of ancient paganism, dressed up in a Christian veneer. According to Hislop, Nimrod was the first high priest. He was the first king of Babylon, now in the shadow of the obelisk that towers over Vatican City.

Another has been chosen to wear his crown. And this new Pope, still unnamed to the public at this point, is stepping into that role precisely at the moment with the world feels like it’s teetering on the edge of destruction, economic chaos, wars, rumors of wars, artificial intelligence, robotics, UFO disclosures. And then now, all of a sudden, during this turmoil, we have a new Pontiff, a new Pope, who’s being ushered in with breathtaking speed while cloaked in ancient rites. All well, most Christians around the world cheer from the sidelines. But why the haste? Why the rush? Why were the Cardinals so quick to elect a successor? What force was pushing them behind those locked doors? And let me ask you this, is it possible? No.

Likely that this isn’t about preserving faith, but about consolidating power before the storm breaks. Do they know something we don’t know? That is the question we are asking today. You don’t need to dig fire to find the clues. The architecture of Vatican City itself is riddled with Babylonian geometry. Sunwheels, obelisks, miters shaped after the dragon, the fish god of Nineveh. Even the Eucharist host bears uncanny resemblance to the sun disks worshipped in ancient Egypt and Sumer. So what exactly just happened today? Was it the installation of a new Pope or the anointing of a high priest in a long-running pagan mystery religion? And the most disturbing part of it is, the man hasn’t even spoken yet.

And when he does speak, what will he say? Once his name is spoken, once he is revealed, it will land with a very heavy weight. Not because of who he is, but what he represents. Because this isn’t just a man, it’s a symbol. He is a symbol. The continuation of something dark, something ancient, according to Alexander Hislop. Now let me just be clear, there’s a lot of people, a lot of scholars who refute Hislop and his work and say that the whole two Babylon’s thing is made up. But is it? Once this new Pope, this new man, steps onto the balcony, hands raised in blessing, and the crowd erupts, history will be changed forever.

Millions of people around the world will watch it, but few actually see the symbols and the echoes of history being replicated on that stage, on that balcony, the miter on his head, Babylonian in origin, the crowsier in his hand, once held by sun priests. The title he now bears, Pontifex Maximus, was worn by the Caesars of Rome, who took it from the high priests of the pagan temples. It all connects. Hislop told us, in the two Babylon’s, the papacy is the spiritual twin of Babylon, its bloodline unbroken, its rites uninterrupted. What was once whispered in the shadows of Nimrod’s temples now echoes from the Vatican balcony.

And the timing? Too perfect. Too coincidental. What are the odds that it all will happen right now? 2025, the year Alice Bailey predicted the externalization of the hierarchy would begin. The year that occult forces, according to mystics and elites, would move from the shadows into the open. And now? White smoke. The perfect cover. The new shepherd for the world, hurtling towards chaos. But, according to Hislop, this new shepherd, this new pope, he doesn’t lead the sheep, he opens the gate. And what might come through that gate is far from holy. Announced to you that we have our Father.

The world had our Father. Now, all of a sudden, He’s our Holy Father. And we’re pledging Him our love and our allegiance and our loyalty and our prayer. Everyone says there hasn’t been anyone like Him. That’s what’s so fascinating. And people of all faiths want to touch Him. Yeah. Well, that’s an appeal, too. You know, we call Him the Holy Father. Holy Father, please forgive me. Holy Father. You’ll hear that title used quite often. This man, Bergoglio, Francis the talking pope, his predecessors, John Paul II, Pope Benedict, John Paul I, Pope Paul, Pope John XXIII, Pope Pius.

You can go all the way back, folks. I’m talking centuries. These men are replacement gods. And these men have taken upon themselves the title of Holy Father. He wears the titles of God. He wears the title Holy Father, head of the church. He never died for the church, but he stole that title from Christ. Jesus said, And call no man your Father upon the earth. For one is your Father, which is in heaven. Yet the popes took to themselves the name Holy Father, along with all claims of authority that might be assumed by such a title.

Pope Innocent III, who fathered the Inquisition, said, The Pope holdeth place on earth, not simply of a man, but of the true God. Meanwhile, Pope Nicholas said of himself, I am in all and above all. So that God himself and I, the vicar of God, hath both one consistory, and I am able to do almost all that God can do. I then, being above all, seem by this reason to be above all gods. Nicholas even claimed that the popes had the power to change the gospel itself, saying, Wherefore, no marvel, if it be in my power, to dispense with all things, yea, with the precepts of Christ.

But in the Bible, Jesus says, Behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it, and no man openeth. The Apostle Paul warned that, if any man, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you, let him be accursed. Yet, despite these biblical warnings, the popes repeatedly claimed they were equal to and above God, and were even called by Catholics, our Lord God, the Pope. The Lateran council, while addressing Pope Julius II, said to him, Take care that we lose not that salvation, that life and breath which thou hast given us, for thou art shepherd, thou art physician, thou art governor, thou art husbandman, thou finally art another god on earth.

In the 19th century, Cardinal Giuseppe Sarto, who would later become Pope Pius X, declared, The Pope is not simply the representative of Jesus Christ. On the contrary, he is Jesus Christ himself, under the veil of the flesh. Does the Pope speak? It is Jesus Christ who is speaking. Hence, when anyone speaks of the Pope, it is not necessary to examine, but to obey. Jesus said of himself, I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man cometh unto the Father, but by me. Yet Pope Pius IX blasphemously declared, I alone am the successor of the apostles, the vicar of Jesus Christ.

I am the way, the truth, and the life. The Popes have not only made claims to be God, but have insisted that salvation itself depends directly upon obedience to them. Pope Boniface VIII said, We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Church. Pope Clement VI said, No man, outside obedience to the Pope of Rome, can ultimately be saved. All who have raised themselves against the faith of the Roman Church, and died in final impenitence, have been damned and gone down to hell.

Even in modern times, Pope John XXIII in 1958 declared, Into this fold of Jesus Christ, no man may enter, unless he be led by the sovereign pontiff, and only if they be united to him, can men be saved. In 1984, Pope John Paul II was quoted as saying, Don’t go to God for forgiveness of sins, come to me. The quote was based on a Los Angeles Times article, which reported, rebutting a belief widely shared by Protestants and a growing number of Roman Catholics, Pope John Paul II dismissed the widespread idea that one can obtain forgiveness directly from God.

[tr:trw].