➡ The text discusses the complexities of the voting system, including the high costs and maintenance of electronic voting machines. It suggests that a simpler, manual voting system could be cheaper and easier to manage. However, it also highlights that those in power, who benefit from the current system, may resist such changes. The text emphasizes the importance of election integrity and suggests that this should be a key issue in state legislative races.
➡ The text discusses the events of January 6th and the perceived injustices surrounding it. It suggests that the ideal outcome for the protesters was for the government to reevaluate the election results. The text also discusses the dismissal of many court cases related to the election, often on procedural grounds, and the perceived censorship and suppression of voices discussing election fraud. It ends with a discussion about Master Sergeant Jeremy Brown, who was asked to provide security at the event and later accused of being a confidential human source for the FBI.
➡ The text discusses the case of Jeremy Brown, who was investigated by intelligence agencies after the events at the Capitol. Despite not entering the Capitol, Brown was charged with trespassing and other charges in Florida. The text suggests that Brown could potentially expose deeper issues within intelligence agencies. The author questions the thoroughness of the investigation and the validity of the evidence against Brown, including two grenades allegedly found at his property, which Brown denies owning.
➡ The text discusses the case of Jeremy Brown, a Green Beret Special Forces member, who was accused of possessing grenades and classified documents. The evidence against him, including a classified CD and a document, was questioned for its credibility and authenticity. Despite this, he was found guilty, leading to speculation that the evidence may have been planted. The text also suggests that Brown’s conviction could be a result of him refusing to become an agent provocateur, and his knowledge of insider information.
➡ The text discusses a legal case involving firearms charges, where the accused is appealing based on a Supreme Court decision (Bruin vs New York State) that interprets the Second Amendment in the context of the time of the founding fathers. The text also discusses the controversial banning of bump stocks by President Trump, which led to increased scrutiny of firearm regulations. The author suggests that this scrutiny could potentially benefit the accused in his appeal. The text also touches on the fluctuating legal status of certain firearms and accessories, which can potentially criminalize owners overnight.
➡ The speaker discusses their frustration with gun regulations, particularly the requirement for a tax stamp for suppressors, which they believe doesn’t increase safety but limits accessibility. They also express concern about the overreach of three-letter agencies and the need for them to be reined in. They touch on the case of Jeremy Brown and the potential implications if his appeal goes through, which could lead to a significant change in ATF regulations. Lastly, they discuss the controversial pardoning of J6 political prisoners and the lack of transparency around the events of January 6th.
➡ The text discusses concerns about the treatment of individuals involved in the January 6th events, including issues with legal representation and perceived violations of their rights. It also mentions the potential for a comprehensive investigation into these events, led by Representative Barry Loudermilk. The speaker expresses hope that the truth will be uncovered, and also discusses their own media work and platforms. The text ends with a critique of President Trump’s response to these issues and a call for faster action.

Are able to do that for federal elections, perhaps then the state and local elections will also kind of do away with machines. That’s the ultimate goal. And I don’t know that he’s going to do that. I’m just speculating. That actually answers a follow up question I had. I guess I’ll ask it retroactively then. But I was just wondering what would be the most practical way about going about this? Because we’re, we’re talking about twofold solution, complex problem problem that’s got more than just two quick answers. But one of those is breaking up election and municipal elections from like the federal ticket for everything you just described.

And then also moving away from these more expensive electronic voting machines. And just another point in there too that you mentioned, it’s not just how much the machines cost and how much the auditors cost, but this, these ongoing maintenance fees. And it would just beg the question, like okay, if, if everyone has to do an election machine update, why that? Like what are you fixing from the last version? Like why is this update required? Shouldn’t they be almost agnostic to the process? They should just be fancy tabulation machines, which obviously they aren’t, right? They’re way more complicated than that because they’ve got all this logic to do like self tallying and generating the QR and doing self checks to even know that these two QR codes didn’t match.

All that is ancillary to just tabulating the Damn number. Just add +1 onto this one number that you’ve got in mind. So I guess the, the answer would be that if manual like non machine voting was implemented at the federal level and then separated out so that you would just do it for these three positions, for example, then if, if it truly had merit, if that could prove that it was cheaper, easier, all of the things, and it would almost be a natural evolution to like revert electronic voting back into manual voting and to keep splitting that off if for no other reason than it’s easier and cheaper for everyone.

Although my tin foil hat secured back on why the hell if, if corruption is there by design, which I would assume that it is by design, like why would anyone allow that process to go in reverse? Like even if Donald Trump were to do it for federal great, you, you just took out, as you even said, the three positions that have probably the least impact to people. So if it’s up to the states and if it’s up to the people that already allow the corruption to get in to begin with, why, why take out your Own little Trojan horse, right? Exactly.

You answered your own question. Because the people that have the power and the authority to change this have no interest in changing it because they’re benefactors of it. They benefit from this. They are holding their positions of power. And no, no politician ever says, you know, no state legislator is saying, my goal is to be a state legislator forever. You have a couple like Robin Voss, who’s been the speaker of the House, longest sitting speaker in Wisconsin for I think it’s like 30 years or something like that. It’s ridiculous. So you do have some people that are happy and content at their state level job.

The former Secretary of State in New Hampshire, Bill Gardner, I think was his name. He had been there for like 40 years as secretary of State in New Hampshire. No desire to move on. Why? I don’t know. I don’t know. But these people all ultimately have aspirations to move on to higher office, whether it’s, you know, federal, the president, wherever it may be, bureaucracy, you know, as secretary in some cabinet position. And so the idea that they would change the voting system so that they no longer have the influence and control, but the way that they do right now, it’s completely and totally, it would be insane for them to even think of doing that.

And so we’re at a, we’re, we’re at a point now where we understand we, we know what’s going on with it. They know that we know and we know that they know that we know and nothing will get done. So at some point you just got to latch on, like the number one issue in your state legislative races should be election integrity. Should be the number one issue. And when I say election integrity, I don’t mean get out the vote. They get millions and millions of dollars, millions of dollars for get out the vote efforts. We get nothing for election integrity.

We’re crowdsourcing for, you know, for FOIA requests to be able to get data scientists to look at our data. It’s impossible. There is no interest in election integrity. It’s more about load up the voter rolls, put as many fake and gay people as you can on there. It’s, it’s, it’s crazy. The more noise you can add to that system, then the more entropy is kind of expected. So you can fly under the radar and oops, we’re just, we’re dealing at such a high scale. It was a record turnout. Of course there’s going to be a few anomalies, right, that sort of helps out, which is another one of the, I guess a really compelling reason for simplifying the elections.

Making it just so that you’re only got certain districts that are just worrying about, you know, thousands of votes instead of tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands. The you go back to the 2024 election. The one thing I think Donald Trump did that was absolutely genius because nothing got fixed in our elections. Very little got fixed from 2020 to 2024. There were a couple little victories here. The RNC getting Lara Trump as a, as a co chair was, was good. I don’t know that anything great came of that. But you know, we had like Scott Pressler in Pennsylvania who did an excellent job registering voters.

Great job. But Donald Trump came out and said something that took everybody by surprise a couple months before the election. He said, vote early and bank your vote. And he got all these people to flood the mail in ballots. And all these conservatives were out there talking about mail in ballots and voting early. And that, to me, what I believe is that took away their capability of manufacturing mail in ballots after the fact like they did, like I believe they did in 2020. If you have, you know, a small, excuse me, a big percentage of Republicans that voted early, it’s going to be really hard to say that.

Well, all Democrats decided to vote in person in this election. Historically, Democrats overwhelmingly vote it by mail compared to Republicans. But in 2024, we all sudden bucked that trend and now Democrats showed up in person. Yeah, nobody’s going to believe that. Especially coming off the 2020 election, nobody’s going to believe that everybody flipped. Trump also said something fairly cryptic. He said, you’ll never have to vote again. What do you think that he meant when he said that? You know, that is a great question. I have no idea. I have no idea. You said that right? Like that was, I’m not paraphrasing.

The only, the only thing I could think of is, you know, we, we didn’t historically choose the president. The president was chosen by state legislators. The state, the state legislators got together and they chose the president. I, I, Is that what he meant? I don’t know. I have no idea. I know either, man. That’s one of the, he had said so many fascinating, cryptic things. You’re just like, what the hell does that. Even if you’re on his side against his side, it’s like o always keeping you guessing. And yeah, well, the whole, the whole entire J6 which I guess I’m leading up to, and we’ll skip a couple beats so we can get post J6 so we’ll skip, like the, the actual event there.

But that was also a very, like, Donald Trump anomaly. Like the whole entire j. Do you think that anyone in office. Do you think Trump at all had any idea how J6 was going to turn out? Probably not. I don’t, I don’t. I don’t. I think he might have gotten indicators, like when they denied the 10,000 National Guard that he had asked Cash Patel, you know, has talked about this, Chris Miller’s talked about it, that he requested 10,000 National Guard in his office, and they said they didn’t want to deploy them because of the optics at that point.

I think he might have said, something’s going on here. Some like, like they’re setting them up. They’re setting me up. Yeah, I don’t know. I. I don’t know. I don’t think Donald Trump was fully aware that it was going to be to that extent, but perhaps at that moment is where it started catching on. I don’t, I don’t know. I couldn’t get. And I guess just asking you to speculate here, the, the people that were there for January 6th because of all the election fraud we were just talking about, the ones that were like, this is my one chance and I really feel passionate about this.

Like that, like the, the real, the. The air quotes, real grassroots people that show for J6, what was the ideal outcome? Like if, if the stars and the planets align perfectly for everyone on that day, was it that the, the rest of the government sits back and says, wow, you guys are serious about this? Yeah, we are gonna look back into the, the voting. Maybe we’ll redo a new vote. Was. Is that what the ideal outcome was? Or was there. Is there something deeper than that that I don’t get? So I do think they wanted Mike Pence, Vice President Pence, to send the votes, the electors back to the states and tell them to look into your elections.

I do think the 10 days to examine it, I think that was the objective. You know, you remember the courts and the mockingbird media loves to tell us this all the time. No baseless claims, no widespread fraud. Safe, most secure election in American history. But the courts all ruled against Donald Trump. No, the courts didn’t rule against Donald Trump. In fact, very few courts ruled against Donald Trump. And the ones that did, he tended to win. I think he won of the, of the cases that were ruled on merit, meaning on the facts, I believe he won like 70% of them.

The problem is the majority of cases were dismissed on procedural grounds. Latches, meaning you brought, you brought the case too late. There’s no injury, or you should have brought it earlier. Standing, you know, you have no standing to bring this case. They, they dismiss these cases on procedural grounds, never getting to the evidentiary part. And probably the, you know, the, the one that was at the highest level was the Texas versus Pennsylvania et al, and that is Ken Paxton and a slew of conservative states brought a suit in the Supreme Court which is the original, the original jurisdiction for state versus State, state dispute.

He brought this case in December, and I think it was dismissed on December 19 on standing procedural grounds. So if the Supreme Court’s not going to help you and not going to get to the bottom of this and even look at the evidence, we have a broken system. We have a broken system where there’s no checks and balances. There is a, you know, an effort to overthrow an election and you can’t get any redress of grievances, which is fundamental to our constitutional republic. And so when that happened, I think a lot of people understood that and that’s why we showed up in D.C.

because we needed a voice, we needed somebody to hear us and to take a look at what actually happened. We went through all the mass censorship. Remember when YouTube was kicking us off of, you know, I got banned, I got banned off of a, a pretty decent platform on YouTube that, you know, I was making, I was making good money, I had a good voice, I was able to, you know, get messages out to people. I made a great community. And they just took that all away. And they didn’t take it away. And tell me, this is why they just said you’re talking about election fraud.

Okay, but like, are we, are we like a tyrannical country now? Like, are we a third world country or we have banana Republic? You know, it was, it was shocking. And so people showed up to January 6th to redress their grievances. Yeah, and that’s an interesting. So if we skip the last four years, now we’re getting into like a lot of the J6 or some of the J6er are getting actual pardons and they’re being like a leave of, of like criminal sentences. Although there’s a whole bunch of people that have not gotten these pardons that, that you’re still campaigning for.

One of these is Jeremy Brown. So before I go into a bunch of other tangents, I know this is actually of utmost importance because it’s, it’s the most topical of all this. Can you tell me what’s different about Jeremy Brown’s case Master Sergeant Jeremy Brown versus all the other J6ers that we’ve seen get pardons. So Master Sergeant Jeremy Brown is a 20 year Green Beret, served the country for 20 years with excellent service. He was, he was a member of the Oath Keeper group. They call him a militia. Whatever you want to call it, I don’t care.

They, they like to try and make that word like a bad word. It’s, it’s literally a foundation of our republic. Militias. And he was asked to go to, to D.C. on January 6th and provide security for a mother of one of the speakers that had a permit to speak at the Capitol. They had it for, I think it was, I think it was with Ali Alexander. They had a permit to be, to be there and to speak. And so Jeremy Brown was asked to go as security. And so he went. He never went inside the Capitol.

He was not violent. He did not get aggressive with anybody. In fact, he helped a woman in a wheelchair that got knocked over. He was helping her carrying her peaceful protester or he didn’t go into the Capitol at any point? Nope, never went inside the Capitol. Never went inside the Capitol and was only in the place that he was permitted to be like U.S. parks permit. So Jeremy Brown goes back to his home in Florida and he sees Christopher Wray testify. And Christopher Wray said there were no federal agents in, you know, the, the, in the protests and everything else.

Well, Jeremy Brown had been approached in December of 2020 by Department of Homeland Security and the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force. Jeremy Brown being a Green Beret, Special Forces, had worked with the JTTF before, had worked with three letter agencies before. Okay, Our military does this jsoc and they approached him and asked him to be a confidential human source for an event that was taking place in January. And then after he saw January 6th and heard Christopher Wray testify, the light bulb went off and he said that’s what they were recruiting me for. They were recruiting me to be a confidential human source on January 6th.

And so he had recorded all these conversations with the FBI and the dhs. And publicly, you know, he told them I’m recording this. And so he published it. He put it out there and said I was. They tried to recruit me to be a confidential human source for January 6th. Now can, can you explain what is confidential human source just like a code word for agent provocateur or is this just a passive member? Okay, so, so when you say confidential source, you mean like go there and stir some shit up? Yeah. So you remember you Remember Gretchen Whitmer’s kidnapping in, in Michigan? Yes.

I think out of the 12 people that were involved in that like, like eight of them were confidential human sources. So like you had more FBI assets, which is what they call them in the military. They had more FBI assets in that than they did suspects. Right. This, this, I mean winding back the clock a couple decades, but this reminds me a little bit of the lead up to say Oklahoma City and Elohim City where Elohim was supposed to be this recruiting ground for like flypaper for militias, like people that were into militias and then once they get there maybe intentionally radicalize them so that now you’ve got a reason to kick down doors.

But the problem in retrospect based on lot lots of the writings about this is that if you went to Elohim City on any given day and just threw a rock at someone, there was like a greater than, greater than 50% chance, probably a lot higher that you were going to hit someone in Alphabet agency. Like they’re all there larping as like radicalized militia members but really they’re FBI agents and DEA agents and CIA agents. Everyone was there not coordinating with each other like we’ve seen in like Waco and all this too. So it, this almost feels.

I, I’ve heard this referred to as patcon. Are you familiar with that particular acronym? No. If not, I hope, I hope I can be the one that introduce you to it. It’s. It was a program that I believe started to form in the, the mid-80s and this is specific to Waco and Oklahoma City. But PATCON was an infiltration by the Alphabet agencies into militias in order to do like a, like a Fabian Society style infiltration of these militias. Not a J6 but like to slowly plant seeds over decades so that the, the main sources of this like extremist content and things like kidnapping actual politicians and doing it in such a way that it just gets massive coverage and it’s like convenient coverage that has all the sound bites like ready to go is sort of a natural extension of this, this Pat Con conspiracy.

So kind of sounds like cointelpro. Exactly. It’s a cointelpro only instead of the FBI targeting like liberals and blacks, I guess in that case now they’re targeting militia members. Are targeting like the, the extreme side of like right wing politics. Yeah, this is, I mean this has been going on with our federal agencies for, for especially our intelligence agencies. And it got worse after you know, 9, 11 when we took all, all the agencies and put them under the odni, the OFFER Office of the Director of National Intelligence, it got infinitely worse because now they’re all sharing information back and forth and like, we just created a monster.

The Patriot act is the worst thing that’s ever happened in my lifetime to this country to preemptively answer my question and let you correct it. But if the question is what makes Jeremy Brown different? Well, Jeremy Brown has some insider info that would again, unravel a much deeper issue than just grandma showed up or some Twitter personality showed up and they, they put their feet up on Nancy Pelosi’s desk and like, walked around the inside of the Capitol and, you know, someone has to be held accountable. There has to be consequences for taking it that far.

But if you’ve got someone that didn’t actually enter the Capitol, had a permit to be there, had all these. But he also could sort of be this like, whistleblower on the Alphabet agencies, which would unravel the entire J6 event. I can see why that would not be the one that gets like a pardon immediately. So is the appeal to Donald, in your opinion, is the appeal to Donald Trump, like, is Donald Trump in on it in that case? Would he look back and be like, oh, yeah, I can’t put our three letter agencies under that much stress.

This guy unfortunately has to like, fall on the sword? I don’t believe so. Not, not, not even a little bit. I have tremendous faith in the, in the goals of Donald Trump. Is, is it just he hasn’t heard about it yet or it’s like, so what would prevent him from just being like, oh, here’s your pardon. So here’s the thing, is the, the case in Florida, and I don’t know if this was deliberate. In, in, in hindsight, it looks like it was deliberate, but back then I never would have had the foresight to think of, of this.

Jeremy Brown was forbidden from making a J6 argument during his case in Florida. So after, so let’s, let’s go back to. He’s at the Capitol, he goes back home. I think it was like September of 2021 rolls around and the FBI had reached out to him, you know, made some contact with him. He had a feeling that he was being investigated. In fact, he knew that morning he said, I think the FBI is going to show up and raid my house today. He told his, his former campaign manager that he thought the FBI was going to come up and raid his house that day.

So Jeremy was facing two separate charges. He had the misdemeanor trespass charges in D.C. and then he had charges in Florida that arose after the search on his house. So they came down to Florida, they, the FBI, the JTTF in Tampa goes and searches his house and they, they won’t show him the warrant at first. They end up ultimately showing it to him, to him and his, his girlfriend. They turn off all of his security cameras. So this is a Green beret. He’s got 14 security cameras throughout his house. Every, you know, he’s a very secure minded guy, security minded guy.

They turn him off and they keep him off the entire time they’re searching. They go into an RV that was on his property and they come out and they say, clear the area, everybody get out of here. We found grenades. And so they go and they pull his flak jacket out and he’s got two grenade pouches on his flak jacket. And they said, we found two M67 frag grenades, which are what we used in the military. They take the grenades out, they put them in the grass, they photograph them, they put them in a box and they take them off to get detonated or whatever it may be as evidence and all that.

So they end up running the forensics on those grenades. They had duct tape around them. And I know you’re in the Air Force, but if you’ve ever dealt with grenades, a lot of times we put duct tape around them to prevent the spoon from coming off accidentally. You know, pin pull gets pulled. Somehow it’s this, the spoon’s not just going to fall off and you have a live grenade. So on this tape, they did a forensics on the tape and they found textile fibers like carpet, you know, T shirts, stuff that’s not organic. They found textile fibers, hair fibers, organic hair fibers, DNA, fingerprints, and I think that was it.

Those four things they found on the tape, none of it matched anything having to do with Jeremy Brown. Not his hair, not his girlfriend’s hair, not his dog’s hair, not the textile fibers from anywhere in his house or in his rv. The fingerprints weren’t his, the DNA wasn’t his. It was no attachment to Jeremy Brown whatsoever. And Jeremy Brown disavowed ever owning these or. Absolutely, absolutely. So again, again, go back to what I said earlier about Jeremy telling his campaign manager, I think today’s the day the FBI is going to show up at the house. Green Berets, all of our special operators are extremely intelligent.

Like, I, I know people like to think that they’re this big, strong guys with the guns and they can, you know, John Wick The. Out of everybody. But they’re incredibly intelligent. They’re trained. What was your favorite crayon flavor? Definitely orange. Always. Always orange. Always. I was just an infantry guy, so while my ASVAP was exceptionally high, I think it was like a 142 or 146. I. I was not special forces or anything. Okay. But these guys are incredibly intelligent. I’ve done a lot of work with. With some of those. With, you know, JSOC guys when we were deployed.

You need to put the crane on their mouth instead of their nose. That. That kind of level of intelligence. Yep. They know to take the wrapper. They know to take the wrapper off first and melt it down just a little bit. Oh, wow. Okay. G. Genius level. So there’s. There’s no way that. That Jeremy Brown knows the FBI is coming to his house, and he doesn’t have the wherewithal to think, oh, I’ve got these illegal M67 frag grenades in my RV. Maybe I should make those disappear. In other words, they weren’t there. It was out of his mind.

Okay, you don’t have frag grenades. And. And. And, you know, the FBI, there’s a good chance they’re coming this day. You express that to somebody and a light bulb doesn’t go off. Like, maybe I should get the illegal out of my house. And so I. I don’t believe he had them. But I digress. Let’s get back to the court. During the trial, they go through and they present, you know, the reports of where the lot of grenades had been throughout its entire life. Of the lot, 40 or 50,000 grenades, and the lot that those two grenades came from, they made the case that they were in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And Jeremy Brown was in Iraq and Afghanistan. So therefore, he had access to take them home. He had the ability to bring them home from overseas deployment. Did you ever deploy overseas? No, thank God, no. Okay, so when you come back from an overseas deployment. I did two combat deployments and four movements. Throughout those deployments, whenever you leave an area of operation, you go through customs, and it’s not like customs. When you get off a plane in Canada or in Italy or England, where you go through, do you declare anything? No. Okay, let me look. Okay, you’re good.

No, this is, like, stripped down to your T shirt, pants, and they go through every single thing that you own or that you have with you. They take your sea bag, they dump your sea bag out. They press on all the pockets to make sure there’s nothing in there. If you have CDs or, or anything. They, they make you put it in and make sure there’s no classified documents on it. If you dealt with classified documents, not everybody does. You know, I had a top secret sci and which I also lost. So I went through this process, but it wasn’t going to another country.

It was going through anyway. Different story. But out of a skiff. Yeah, I’m familiar with this process and how thorough the. Everything can be where you’re not going to. Even if you’re sneaking like a secret note behind the battery compartment in your CD player, like everything pretty much gets dissected. This is not the same as going through customs in an airport. So you’re, you’re far less likely to find or you’re not going to get a grenade through this check. You maybe, maybe can get like a spare round or something like a five, five, six round. Maybe like you, you cut out your boot and you were able to wedge it in between the sole of your boot and then glued it back together and they didn’t find it.

But I mean, they have, they have not drug dogs, but explosive spelling dogs, drug dogs. Because there’s a lot of heroin in Afghanistan, a lot of heroin and marijuana and all sorts of other drugs over there. So you’re very thoroughly vetted. There’s no way he, he got a grenade out of Afghanistan. And Green and Green Beret Special Forces, they go through even more scrutiny than, than we did as infantry. So fast forward, they never were able to tie those two grenades, the lot of grenades, with a date and time that Jeremy was there. Just that they were there.

He was there. So therefore he could have gotten them. The last known place that they are, that they were in. The report, the DODIC report that they gave them was a black site in Kentucky. So, so that whole lot of grenades is sitting in Kentucky right now and they just happen to at some point be in Afghanistan. But it’s far more likely that Jeremy got through customs and held on to these grenades for 10 years and everything else than. Right, well, I mean, I was gonna say I’m not gonna out anyone, but I mean, I’m also in Florida and I would be lying if I said I didn’t know a single person that had grenades and you wouldn’t have to smuggle them from Afghanistan or even Iraq or anything like through an active duty and then sit on them for 10 years.

There’s other sources that you could get that would be way more convenient than that if that’s really what you had your heart set On. Yeah, and then you wouldn’t knowingly leave them out exposed in the open when the FBI is coming to raid your house. I can see that that one is like one of the more cliche argument, just devil’s advocate. That’s one of the most cliche ones. Like, oh, I wouldn’t be that stupid. You know, you see that on cops all the time. Like, oh, yeah, yeah, but you’re dealing with a guy that has a crack pipe on his floor.

You’re not dealing with a Green Beret. 20 years of experience at the highest level of operations in our country. That, yeah, but that, that does answer, I guess, more thoroughly the question of what makes Jeremy Brown different. And that’s that in order for him to get a pardon, there’d also be. Have. Have to be an acknowledgment that this was planted on him. Right. And that if that were plant. No. Okay, well what, what are the ways that he could get a pardon which wouldn’t also incriminate some three letter agency? Well, hang on, let me add one thing to this.

That’s two things that are extremely important to the credibility of the FBI in this case. Jeremy Brown had 10 charges in total. Two of them were gun charges, two of them were grenade charges, three of them were grenade charges. I think four of them were a classified CD that he had, quote, unquote had. And one of them was a classified document that he had. The classified CD they say was found in his rv. During the trial, the FBI staff specialist that photographed the crime scene said she doesn’t recall ever seeing a cd. The CD was on the very last page of the receipt of evidence all by itself on a standalone page.

And it was out of chronological order with everything else that was found. So the receipts went by which location it was found in. This was found in the bedroom. This was found in the rv. This was found in the house. The CD was out of sync with everything else all by itself on a page, standalone. Like it was kind of slid in there. There wasn’t a photograph of it from the crime scene, except for like, I’m going to hold my cell phone up here. Maybe like that much of the corner, like the little. This part right here, that’s all you could see of the cd and they said that’s the cd.

So you have a classified CD and you didn’t take a picture of it by itself showing the classified markings on it and everything else on it? No, we didn’t do that. We did get a CD picture like that, like months and months later, where they’re like, oh, yeah, this is a cd. Do they claim to have the physical cd? Yeah, they claim. They claim that they took it into custody that day at the. At the crime scene. That they. They claim that it was. So Jeremy’s attorney made the opening statement that I’m going to prove that the FBI planted evidence against my client.

And he did. He was found not guilty of that cd. That. And so the. The. The assumption there is that the jury believe the FBI planted it if he’s not guilty of it. And so maybe it was just beyond the jury that perhaps the grenade could be planted. But the U.S. attorney used a lot of shoddy tricks to. To sway the jury in that regard. For instance, they played his first phone call with his girlfriend when he was in prison, the very first phone call. And he said, well, what did they take? And she said, you know, they took this, they took this, they took grenades, they took this, they took that.

And the U.S. attorney used that as a way of saying, well, Jeremy didn’t freak out and say, wait, grenades? What do you mean, grenades? They used that, right? They didn’t play the whole phone call, though. About 15 minutes later, she says, yeah, they took the live. They took these live grenades, and they have to detonate them. And he’s like, whoa, whoa, whoa. Detonate them? He says they were frag grenades. And he says, I don’t have frag grenades. I have airsoft grenades. I have smoke grenades. Like, I have grenades that you’re legally allowed to own for, you know, recreational purposes, and, you know, a bunch of special forces guys going out in the woods and playing GI Joe.

So he didn’t realize that those were M67 fragmentation grenades, because he didn’t have any of those. He had toy grenades, airsoft stuff. And so they didn’t play the whole. The whole clip. They just played that one clip. And when the jury was deliberating, they came back out, and they actually asked to replay that small little segment the U.S. attorney played. So that weighed on them as to whether or not Jeremy. Why. Jeremy wasn’t surprised when she said grenades. So that was. That was the one part. The other part was the classified document. So throughout the whole trial, Jeremy’s Brown, Jeremy’s attorney kept asking the experts for the state, for the prosecution, this classified document that Jeremy had, was it a draft document or was it a final version? And they said, well, it doesn’t matter.

It’s still classified information. Okay, I’m done. Meanwhile, the U.S. attorney’s like, how dangerous is this? Oh, it’s so dangerous, you know, whatever. So Jeremy takes a stand in his own defense, and he says that entire document was just a template. That entire document, I was in Afghanistan on the Bow Bergdahl rescue mission. His team was part of that. And when he was flying back to the United States, he filled out his trip report on the plane. He didn’t have a SIP or computer, so he did it on his laptop and he, he made a template. So all of the information in there was fake.

Everything in there was fake. And then when he got back home and had a SIP or computer in front of him, he could insert the classified information. Now, the only document that he had was the fake template document. He physically had that. And so the U.S. attorney never went through and did their due diligence on this document to check if any of the information in that report was actually classified or if it was just erroneous bullshit. And he was found guilty of that. So, now, getting to your question about the pardon, the J6ers, none of them, most, most of the ones that are being pardoned, and I think everybody’s being pardoned for the most part.

Donald Trump, he commuted 14 sentences and the rest, he, he pardoned him completely because Jeremy didn’t get to make a J6 argument. He may have been overlooked because I believe his D.C. misdemeanor trespass charges are, have been pardoned, but his, his conviction in Florida is not. But that’s the fruit of the poison tree. You, you justified a search warrant with a misdemeanor trespassing charge. That’s insane. Can you imagine getting a dui? And they say, we’re going to kick down your door and go through your house. That’s insane. Absolutely insane. Where. I forgot where I was going with this.

Oh. So it almost seems that the, that misdemeanor to have the foot in the door so that you can then find planted evidence to put somebody in jail like that almost seems like the retribution for turning down the offer to be an agent provocateur. And then on top of that, now you’re sort of a loose end because you had that insider information. You saw what happened before and after. So. So, yeah, so I guess part of the, the other answer of what makes him different is that he’s not, he wasn’t in legal trouble over J6. He was in legal trouble over a completely unre situation, like a federal situation that was only linked to J6 and that that was the initial justification for planting this evidence.

Well, so in, in the pardon, President Trump says all charges related to January 6th. And since the basis of the warrant to obtain this was January 6th, they should be included. You know, even though the charges were unrelated, it’s, it’s, you know, a legal term called the fruit of the poison tree, meaning, you know, if you obtain this information illegally, then you can’t use as evidence. And so he did have firearms charges. He had two guns. He had a 410 shotgun that was an heirloom that had the stock cut off on it. And then he had a short barreled rifle.

Now he’s appealing those because under the Bruin, New York State Pistol Association, a short barreled rifle is most likely going to be legal. We had a weapon called the Blunderbuss back in the day in the, in the context, you know what Bruin versus New York State is, you have to school me on this. So that was a Supreme Court decision I think in 2021, maybe 2022, that the judge, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment needs to be looked at in the context of our founding fathers and our, and our, you know, that time frame, the 1700s, 1800s, early 1800s.

And so all gun laws need to be in the context and regulations need to be in the context of that. And so if you can go back and this was actually used in a case in Oklahoma where a man was arrested for a firearm and having some marijuana on him in Oklahoma. And he was arrested under charges, federal charges for having possession of a firearm and possession of a controlled substance because marijuana is still a Schedule 1 drug. For some strange fricking reason he ended up winning on a Bruin case saying that in the, in the, in the context of our Constitution, when our, the, our founding fathers framed the Constitution, they did not have a stipulation that you can’t own guns if you smoke pot or if you partake in alcoholism, if you know, if you drink alcohol or if you do whatever drugs they had back then, I don’t know what they had.

And so this actually went to the, I think it was the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, U.S. court of Appeals and he won there too. So Bruen is being applied in, in some situations and I think Jeremy Brown’s case is for sure one of those situations. So he’s got a couple outs I think in, in my, again like tinfoil hat mind. The most likely are the ones where they don’t have to point a finger at a three letter agency. So if they can just say the entire search and seizure was unlawful because the original premise, that seems like an easy out where no one has to get pulled under other investigations, so they don’t have an incentive to keep it quiet.

And then there’s this also, like, constitutional law that you’re mentioning, which would sort of alleviate him from the other two gun charges separate from, I guess, the frag grenade charge. Right. So there’s multiple outs for him to be pardoned or at least have this put behind him. Well, you could also make an argument for the frag grenades. Even though Jeremy firmly believes this and I firmly believe that they were planted, you could still make an argument under Bruin for the frag grenades, because in the, in the 1700s and 1800s, people owned warships with cannons. I mean, I’m.

I guess I’m a Second Amendment extremist. I think you should still be able to. Yeah, So I agree 100%. I’m a second. I’m a second amendment one. Maybe a controversial criticism, but, like, Donald Trump doesn’t seem like the, the most preferable Second Amendment candidate that we’ve ever had. And I guess one of the examples would be how quickly he took away bump stocks after Vegas, even though it was, it was. I understand it was like a symbolic gesture, but it almost showed how little he actually cared about the Second Amendment. That it was like, to paraphrase, it was like, we’ll take them away and figure out the law afterwards.

So there. It almost seems that he might be checking the box for a lot of people on all these different boxes, but when it comes to Second Amendment in particular, it doesn’t seem. Do you think that he’s changed course on that? Do you think it was just a blip? Do you think that was like a justified symbolic gesture that he made, knowing that it would get overturned anyways? So I am. Let me, let me premise this by saying that I am a massive, massive fan of Donald Trump. Massive fan. And not, you know, not because of.

I think Donald Trump is actually on a mission right now and looking at the Cabinet Pixie put out, some of them suck. But putting out people like Cash Patel, like RFK and hhs, I think he’s on a mission. The bump stock ban pissed me off at first, and then I saw how the Second Amendment crowd reacted to it, and I saw what they went to work doing right away. And they put a massive magnifying glass over ETF regulations, over things like this. Like, did you know suppressor. Under ATF regulations, a suppressor is labeled as a firearm.

I do understand. I mean, I’ve had to go through the process of getting the NFA tax stamps and the whole. Yeah, and, and I mean, I remember not too long ago, like, maybe two years ago, there was a scramble for anyone that had, say, like, like a, like a pistol that had the, the arm brace on it, right. A lot of people that had MP5s, you can’t, you can’t really wield an MP5 without putting some sort of a brace on it or an actual stock. And in that case, you’ve just upgraded to a, to an sbr.

So now you need the stamp. But there was sort of an in between, right. If you had the arm brace that I guess was originally made for, you would actually strap it to your arm for stability. But you could also shoulder that puppy. And it was in this weird gray area where technically, if you look at it with one eye squinted, it looks like an svr. But then also if you just wrap the Velcro around your arm really quick, now it’s not an svr. It’s sat in this weird area. And even I even know, like, a lot of ranges in my area, they still have the outdated ATF mandate that’s like, you must show an NFA tax stamp if you’re going to be using like, like a, like an arm brace for one of these.

And then you go up to the counter and they’re like, oh, no, we don’t really enforce that anymore. But, like, it’s still on the poster and it, it just feels like it’s in this weird area of whoever’s currently in charge can determine whether or not you’re a felon at any given moment by, like, the flip of a coin. Like, it could just happen overnight. And that literally happened where now people are scrambling. What do I do with my items? Do I, like, remove the arm and then now, like, I just don’t use it anymore, or I put in for this tax stamp and then they introduce this sort of like a fast pass for tax stamps.

Now you could do it online, you could do it digitally, and you’re not waiting six weeks. Sometimes you can get it 24, 48 hours. But it almost felt like a planned version of this. It was like, how do we get more people to register and tell on themselves so that the next time the coin flips, it’s like, oh, it says here in our records that, you know, you had this two years ago, and we’re guessing you still have that. So I guess this is like one of my only issues that I really care the most about is all these Second Amendment things, because how easy many of us became felons overnight.

And then if you just didn’t say anything for a year, now you’re not a felon again. And it’s such a weird thing to be in because it was like at any given moment, if the cops knocked on my door because they smelt something or like someone said I was at J6 now they could be like, oh, what’s this? An MP5 with an arm brace. Oh, you’re a felon now. Follow us. Yeah, so I think that’s why the, the, the Bruin versus New York State is a significant case. Chevron deference is another massively important case about regulations by bureaucratic institutions.

Atf, for example. And I think, I think whether, and I’m not going to say that I know that this is why he did it, but he, Donald Trump shone a light on that with, with the, with the bump stock brace. He didn’t. He banned a worthless piece of crap. All right, bump stocks are. If you’re a fan of a bump, this is one of the most fair points. But it, yeah, is. Was this like a 6D chess move? Yeah, it’s low hanging fruit. Any if, if any. I was a firearm. I’m an NRA firearms instructor. I have every certification you can imagine.

Massive gun nut. If, if you ever came to me and you’re like, hey, you want to go shoot my bump stock? I’d be like, no, I can do the same thing with my belt loop. It’s so stupid. Well, we should ban belt loops, I think. Right, right, right. And in Florida, I mean Florida, they tried to ban like any trigger that was lighter than the, the stock weight. You know, bionic triggers were banned. Honestly, you have to be reading the news damn near every single day to know what the law is at Florida in any given moment.

Whether or not you’re a felon today. Yep. You’re. We’re over regulated. But so, so I’m actually kind of hoping. So going back to Jeremy Brown, it would actually behoove three letter agencies to get him a pardon because if his appeal goes through, you could see a massive, you could see a massive house cleaning in terms of ATF regulations. I mean it could actually go after the NFA all the way to the nfa. I mean it’s insane to think that a suppressor, a silencer, as they like to call it, a silencer is an NFA weapon or a weapon.

It’s literally a weapon which is a rabbit hole on its own because the, the fact that you need to spend. It’s like $300 or something like that number just hasn’t been updated since it was enforced like I was like 100 years ago or something. Right. That it dates back to because. Right. So I mean nearly a century and because of inflation they haven’t updated that $300. Originally that $300 tax stamp was meant to keep the PO folk out of being able to afford, you know, different type machine guns or whatever you want to put on it.

It was just like if you had enough money to afford it, then you could also get the tax stamp. That number never got updated. But the fact that you still have to get the stamps updated and the fact that it also applies to suppressors now is the weirdest thing because it’s not like a suppressor turns you into an assassin. Like now you’re just shooting your gun out in public and no one knows where they’re coming from. Right. If anything it’s there to protect like your hear and, and you know, maybe reduce recoil so that your shots are actually more accurate.

It just, it’s wild at all and it just feels like a symbolic thing. And I guess to, to end this rant to land my own plane on this. I wonder because it represents in my mind that the NFA tax stamp as a whole and the fact that suppressors are under it, it represents the fact that there’s really been no take in the, in the second amendment battle is there’s lots of give, there’s lots of like, all right, take the bum stocks. It’s a stupid silly toy anyways. Okay, yeah, sure, arm braces are now going to be considered SBRs.

But like what has the Second Amendment ever regained in any of this? One of those things would be the elimination of the 300 tax stamp and the elimination of needing one just for a suppressor. Just to show that there is ebbs and flows in this equation. But in my natural born life it’s only gone one way. It is a like one way ticket to the second. You seed something as silly as a bum stock. You never necessarily if you might gain that back if like some firearms advocate like FBC or something comes in and they get it back for you.

But very rarely, it’s like we got it back and interest, guess what guys, now we all get suppressors. You know, like that, that part of the equation has never happened. And maybe I’m black pilled on this. Do you see it ever getting better in our lifetimes? Like all of a sudden suppressors no longer require stamps or the stamps go away. I think Eric Burleson Congressman from Missouri, I think he introduced a bill to abolish the nfa. And so, you know, there are, there are second amendment, amendment friendly people out there. But to be, ultimately, I think the courts need to strike down these things and need to reel in the bureau, the bureaucracies, the, the atf, you know, the dea, the cd.

Like just any three letter agency in the federal government needs to be reeled in. You know, they’re at the point now where they’re making law. You know, I was listening to RFK junior’s hearing yesterday and all of these senators are asking rfk, you know, you’re just going to go in there and do Trump’s will? Well, yes, that’s what you’re supposed to do as a cabinet member, you are, you are serving at the pleasure of the President. You are somebody there that is to, there to execute and implement his will, his policy. And for them to sit there and say, well, you’re gonna, you’re gonna, you gotta do your own thing.

That’s exactly what we have now. We have a bureaucratic deep state where these bureaucrats get into position and they’re able to implement changes. And look, as president, United States, you don’t have, you know, 100 hours in a day to go through, you know, 25 different cabinet members, however many there are, and monitor every single thing that’s going on in terms of policy and regulation. And so I think that that’s the doge might be the most important thing moving forward with this country is cleaning out the bureaucracy, downsizing it significantly, significantly. We have way too many people in the executive branch of the federal government right now.

Well, speaking of reeling, and I’ll start widening this down and we went way over time. You got, you started talking about second amendment and like I got fired up. So this was a fascinating conversation. Now I understand the specifics about Jeremy Brown’s case. I understand a little bit more about voter fraud and stuff. I, I would absolutely have you come back and do like a breakdown of like the J6 event and all the weird anomalies that went on with that too. So. But tell people again where they can find you. You’ve got endless amount of content.

You’re clearly sort of a subject matter expert on these topics. So where would you recommend someone going and getting started and figuring this stuff out? Can I just add one more thing real quick about the J6, please, please, no. I was trying to go, I was trying to go this way and then, and then I went off on a weave. I’m like Donald Trump just weave everywhere. Donald Trump pardoned 1500. J6ers, the mockingbird media, the leftist, they, they lost. 1500? Yeah, 1500 a little over. I think it was 1590 or 1560 or something like that. Wow.

I had no idea the scale you got to have me back on to talk about J6. And especially if you haven’t been your ear to the wall on J6. It’s insane what our government did to these people. Unbelievable. I could talk to you for three or four hours about James. I mean, consider it a date, man. I would absolutely love to get some more info on that. So you have all these people freaking out about the J6 political prisoners and that’s what they are getting, pardons. Joe Biden pardoned the entire J6 sham committee, numerous witnesses involved in the J6 committee, politicians that were adjacent to the J6 sham committee.

We don’t even know the extent of what these people did. These were preemptive pardons. They did not pardon a specific crime. They were not charged with a crime. They were not indicted with a crime. We still don’t know. I saw a report today, and I don’t know if this is true or not, but that Thomas Massie said the, the J6 pipe bomber was a U.S. capitol Police officer. I mean, we don’t know the identity of the person that planted a bomb. Bombs, they were fake at the DNC and the RNC on January 6th. That sparked this whole thing that pulled law enforcement resources away from the Capitol and made it so that they had limited numbers at the US Capitol itself.

They had to go to the DNC and RNC and lock it down and get all these politicians out of there because there was a bomb threat. We don’t know who that person is and we don’t know the extent to which Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Benny Thompson, we don’t know. Adam Schiff. We don’t know the extent to which they either covered up what happened on January 6 or maybe even orchestrated it. And so we have the left wing media freaking out about people that were prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. People in prison for three or four years for misdemeanor trespassing.

You wouldn’t even go to prison for that. Outside, outside of, you know, January 6th, you have people in prison for three, four years of that. All of them tried in Washington D.C. no change of venue was ever granted. No motion to change a venue was ever granted. D.C. is not a, a court of their peers, a jury of their peers in any way. Shape or form. You know, they, some of them were, you know, denied their outside counsel. They had to get D.C. lawyers. You know, some of them were prevented from making First Amendment arguments. Some of them were told their sixth Amendment rights were gone because of the influx of COVID cases and the influx of J6 cases.

These people were put through the ringer. They were set up to fail. And so the worst of the worst that happened to them and they were pardoned for it. Meanwhile, we got preemptive pardons for the J6 Sham committee and we have no idea what they did. They might have committed treason against the American people and subverted the entire United States, and we have no idea. And on, and on top of that, let me just add a little black pill sort of seasoning to that too. But even if you are in the, a position to be able to find out who did what and what, what those crimes might have been that they got preemptively pardoned for, the fact that they were preemptively pardoned removes like 99% of any incentive that you would dedicate time and resource to looking more into it.

Even if you were like, I know that this person did this horrific thing, but even if I can prove it and even I can get the entire public on my side about this, they got a pardon. So there’s ultimately no reason other than maybe putting together a Netflix documentary or whatever. The conservative version of a Netflix that would actually cover that particular viewpoint would be. Right. So it, it sort of gets them off extra scot free because now, like, even if you could know, we probably won’t. Well, it also takes away their ability to plead the Fifth.

So they can’t plead the fifth Amendment anymore because they’ve been pardoned for it. And, and the investigation is not going to die. First and foremost, there’s citizen journalists and investigative journalists out there that are still on top of this. You know, Darren Beatties, myself, Julie Kelly, you know, there’s a lot of good. And they have access to people with big voices to get this information out. But the most important thing and, and we can end here. Barry Loudermilk. Representative Barry Loudermilk from Georgia is going to be chairing the J6 political investigation, a subcommittee under the House Judiciary.

All right, this time it’s under the judiciary. The last time, I think the chairman was Brian Stiles. So subpoenas had to go through Brian style. Now the subpoenas go through Jim Jordan. And I believe that Jim Jordan will be more interested in getting to the truth and allow some of these subpoenas to go through on the investigation. And so I have faith that we will get to the bottom of what happened on January 6th. Well, I honestly feel blessed that I even had you on here to be able to break all this down and I can have you come back and explain more of J6 to me.

I hope, just as a small token that if you look into patcon, you’ll be like, oh, wow, this is a cool thing that I hadn’t heard of before because I think it kind of squarely, it would at least provide a chronological origin point for some of what we’ve seen evolve over the last like three decades on this. I definitely will. So, Brian Lupo, thanks again for coming on here. The Cannabis Conservative. Where are all the places that people should find you again? We’ll go back through your plugs. So on. On X at Cancon Actual on Truth Social.

I think I’m just at Cancon on truth social rumble.com cancon and I do a show Monday through Friday on badlands media at 10am Called Badlands Daily. I do a show called SITREP on Thursday nights. It’s all veteran podcast and on Friday nights this is one you really should watch, especially if you’re tech savvy. I do a show called why We Vote and right now I’m, I’m doing a, a series every Friday night at 7:30pm Eastern with I don’t know if you know who Mad Liberals is on X. Mad Mad underscore Liberals on X. He’s a massive wealth of knowledge and he is just absolutely blown up.

The elections in Georgia. It’s. I would go back and watch the last two episodes we did and he’s going to be on again tomorrow night. Insane. And that’s called why we vote. That series. 7:30. Yep. And all this is on Rumble because we’re not allowed to be on YouTube because we’re too spicy. Yeah, we’ll see if this one makes it. You should be good. I mean they, they let you talk about the election stuff now. Yeah, I mean my, my experience is that you, you’re good until you’re not. And then you wake up one morning and it’s like something that’s been good for the last seven months is no longer good.

Kind of get like getting rated if you’re Jeremy. And speaking of Jeremy Brown, to wrap this down a little bit, like is this something that’s already sorting itself out or does this need like public outcry? Do people need to go and contact someone about this or is it already on the radar and it’s just a matter of, of waiting it to go through all the process. We, we do believe that the Trump administration is aware of it, that they are working to remedy it. But this is where I’m going to be critical of President Trump. Not working fast enough.

This should be a stroke of a pen and this is a no brainer. 20 years of exemplary service to this country and you know, misdemeanor trespassing for a permitted place that he never was violent and never went inside the Capitol. This is a no brainer. I’ll leave it there, man. Thank you again, Brian, for coming on here. Appreciate your time. Absolutely no problem. Take care. No I scribbled my life away Driven to write the page Will it enlight your brain give you the flight my plane paper the highs ablaze somewhat of an amazing feel when it’s real to real you will engage it your favorite of course the lord of an arrangement I gave you the proper results to hit the pavement if they get emotional hey maybe your language a game how they they playing it well without makers evade them whatever the cost they are to shapeshift snakes get decapitated met is the apex execution of flame you out nuclear bomb distributed at war rather gruesome for eyes to see max them out than I light my trees blow it off in the face.

You’re despising me for what though calculated it rather cut throat paranoid American must be all the blood smoke for real Lord give me your day away vacate they wait around to hate whatever they say man it’s not in the least bit we get heavy rotate when a beat hits them than cuz you’re welcome for real you’re welcome they ain’t never had a deal you’re welcome man they lacking a pill you’re welcome yet they doing it still you’re welcome.
[tr:tra].