The New World Order and Its Impact on Global Politics by Tommy Truthful
In a world where the geopolitical landscape is constantly shifting, the quest for dominance and peace takes on various forms. The term “New World Order” has been a subject of much debate and speculation over the years, especially following its public announcement by President George H.W. Bush on January 16, 1991. As the Soviet Union was on the brink of collapse and the Cold War was drawing to a close, President Bush seized the moment to advocate for a new paradigm of American dominance on the global stage. This vision for a “New World Order” was not just a statement of intent but a declaration of the United States’ role in shaping the post-Cold War era.
A Vision for Global Governance
President Bush’s vision for the New World Order was one where international law and the principles of justice governed the conduct of nations, rather than the unchecked ambitions of individual states. He envisioned a world where the United Nations, empowered by a credible peacekeeping force, could fulfill its founding promise of ensuring global peace and security. This idealistic view was rooted in the belief that the end of the Cold War presented a unique opportunity to reshape international relations in a more cooperative and peaceful manner.
The Reality of Geopolitical Ambitions
However, the path to realizing this vision has been anything but straightforward. Vladimir Putin’s revelation to Oliver Stone about Russia’s interest in joining NATO in 2000, and the subsequent apprehensive response from the American delegation, underscores the complexities of international diplomacy and the challenges in achieving true global unity. The reluctance to include Russia in NATO hinted at underlying strategies and ambitions that went beyond the public rhetoric of peace and cooperation.
The Project for the New American Century
Further complicating the narrative of global peace efforts was the establishment of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) in 1997 by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The publication of their agenda, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” in September 2000, laid out a bold and aggressive strategy for American global dominance. This strategy, which emphasized military strength and strategic interventions, particularly in the Middle East and ultimately against Russia, revealed a stark contrast to the ideals of the New World Order as initially presented.
The PNAC document candidly acknowledged the potential backlash from American allies and the international community at large, suggesting that the pursuit of world dominance might be a protracted endeavor without a significant and unifying event akin to a “new Pearl Harbor.”
Reflecting on the New World Order
As we look back on these developments, it’s clear that the journey toward a New World Order has been fraught with contradictions and challenges. While the vision of a world governed by the rule of law remains compelling, the reality of geopolitical strategies and ambitions often tells a different story. The quest for dominance, peace, and security continues to shape international relations, leaving us to ponder the true meaning of the New World Order and its implications for future generations.
In this era of global politics, where ambitions and visions collide, understanding the historical context and underlying motives behind such grand declarations is crucial. As we navigate these complex waters, let us remain vigilant in questioning and critically examining the strategies and actions of global powers, striving always for a world where peace and justice prevail.
Summary
Transcript
On January 1691, as the Soviet Union was collapsing and the Cold War coming to an end, George H. W. Bush publicly announced a new campaign of american dominance, which he called the New World Order. This is in historic moment. We have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and cold War. We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations.
When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible united nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN’s founders. Vladimir Putin told Oliver Stone that in the year 2000, he asked President Clinton if Russia could join NATO, which he said made the american delegation very nervous. They were not interested in world peace.
They had different plans. In 1997, the Project for the new American Century was founded by William Crystal and Victoria Newland’s husband, Robert Kagan. In September of 2000, they published their agenda entitled rebuilding America’s defenses, which outlined an ambitious and aggressive plan to achieve world dominance, starting in the Middle east and ending with Russia. The document acknowledged the fact that their world domination efforts would trouble american allies and could therefore be a long process absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor.
A year after publishing this, 2000, people were murdered in the World Trade center and blamed on a small terrorist group created by the CIA. And with this catastrophic and catalyzing event, the plan for a new american century went into action. About ten days after 911, I went through the Pentagon and one of the generals called me in. He says, we’ve made the decision, we’re going to war with Iraq.
This was on or about the 20 September. I said, we’re going to war with Iraq. Why? He said, I don’t know. So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time, we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, are we still going to war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it’s worse than that. He said, I just got this down from upstairs, meaning the secretary of defense office today.
And he said, this is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran. George H. W. Bush’s son, George W. Began a propaganda campaign to sell the american public on overthrowing Iraq. I take the threat very seriously. I take the fact that he develops weapons of mass destruction very seriously.
Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists. When the lies became obvious, George W. Made jokes while reveling in the blood of the innocent. Those weapons of mass destruction got to be somewhere. Nope. No weapons over there. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said that murdering millions of iraqi children was worth it. We have heard that a half a million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima.
Is the price worth it? I think this is a very hard choice. But the price. We think the price is worth it. The power hungry cabal, made up of close knit families who practice multi generational child abuse and mass mind control, began overthrowing sovereign nations and murdering innocent civilians became the new norm for us foreign policy. But their plan for global domination was failing. And starting in 2020, with the COVID scam, they began targeting us citizens.
They have become desperate, and they are going for broke. Slaughtering innocent Palestinians to spark a war with Iran and sacrificing the people of Ukraine to hopelessly take on Russia. These inbred families are getting old, and they are fighting for their lives. There is too much at stake for them to ever give up, which makes them more dangerous than ever. But they are few and we are many, and they must be stopped.
Reporting for Infowars, this is Greg Reese. .
