Video Summary
Summary
- The author of the text discusses technical issues with his camera equipment, announces a meet-up in Santa Fe, New Mexico, and promises upcoming videos about Easter Island and the Crystal Skull. He also discusses processing through a new book titled 'The Phoenix Hypothesis,' which heavily cites his research but doesn't support his 'Phoenix phenonmenon' theory. His analysis of this book uncovers elements of genius, questionable data sources, and significant disagreement with his own teachings.- The speaker discusses the work of Christian Colhurt, particularly his Phoenix Hypothesis, emphasizing its similarities to his own published work on the Phoenix. He articulates his discomfort with certain aspects of Colhurt's work and questions its originality, wondering if his own Archaics research was used. Despite this, the speaker clarifies that his audience should make their own judgments about Colhurt's work. He also mentions discrepancies in the dating of Colhurt's work on his website. Finally, he questions the repetitive use of 'Phoenix Hypothesis' in the text, making it sound like his own repeated use of 'Archaics'.- The text delves into the work, story and research of Jason Brashears, known as Archaics, who has extensively studied ancient literature and calendar systems, leading to the Phoenix Hypothesis which details the cyclical nature of global catastrophic events. Noted for his exceptional learning-curve developed during a 30-year imprisonment, the text questions whether his criminal record affects his credibility as a researcher. However, his immense knowledge, dedication to reading and research, and comprehensive understanding of history based on cyclical resets is highly praised.
- The speaker complains about perceived plagiarism of his ideas regarding simulation theory, the polarization of the Truth movement, and the manipulation by elite organizations, in a book by another author named Jason; he argues that his theories have been borrowed heavily but not appropriately credited.- The author discusses his issues with a writer appropriating his research theory, known as the Phoenix Hypothesis, in a book without attributing credit or context accurately. The author criticizes that this writer's interpretations and applications of the theory diverge significantly from its original intent, notably omitting crucial aspects such as the 138-year periodicity, cycles of destruction and resets, and evidence of a computerized existence. His concern extends to the impact this could have on understanding and disseminating the accurate theory, especially when it's presented in a misleading manner.- The author expresses deep dissatisfaction and frustration with a book titled 'The Phoenix Hypothesis', accusing the writer of plagiarizing his ideas and theories, promoting opposite viewpoints and attempting to steer the narrative away from his own research while failing to credit him. He believes this might be part of a greater effort to control the international conversation on the Phoenix phenomenon.- The speaker has compared their facial shading in a picture with a pyramid, indicating a PDF has been uploaded to Podia and the link will be added to the description box shortly. '
'
Video Transcription
Summary
Video TranscriptionNo, it's not a conspiracy. They didn't take me down. Sorry, guys. That was absolutely me. I'm on a backup camera because this little bad boy that's crystal clear that I normally use, I forgot to recharge the battery. It sorry about that. That's why I got this backup camera. Just let me know my audio is good. We got to get into this one. We got to get into it's. Good. Audio is good. Excellent.
Well, on September 9, the crew and I are going to be in Santa Fe, New Mexico. And if you want to come do a meet up, we're going to be at the Blue Corn Cafe and Brewery. Think that's about 1230 noon. 1230 Santa Fe, New Mexico.
I slowed that chat down. It's still going fast. Waiting for a few more people to catch up in a chat. I know I gave people the old switcheroo and they abandoned, and that's cool. This video is not meant for everybody, but it's going to be a good one.
Got this book in the mail last night. I read it. In about four and a half hours, I was done. I processed what I read for about an hour and a half, went back and reread significant portions, put it all together and realize exactly what I was dealing with. And I'm going to let you guys have the I know.
I know what mic it is. Brock. Lucas. You're right. I've already disengaged that microphone. I'm on the mic that's attached to the other camera. I don't have time to do all these reconfigurations. This right here had its own setup. It has the whole focus right, set up. It's got all these other devices that get a cloud lifter. The cloud lifter, focus, right? Everything went through here. This is my backup. It just goes straight into my computer. It's my emergency microphone and camera.
Monica Pharaoh. Hey. Hey. Monica. Been around since way before I had a thousand subs. You've been around for a while, too. Nemesis. Becks, you want a moderator? Wrench, you let me know. You've been around for a while. How you doing, New Zealand? I'm waiting for a few more people to get in the chat before we start this amazing video.
Because, guys, when I do a deep dive in a book and this book's, the one I did a deep dive on, I read this entire book. Don will tell you because I totally ignored her the whole four and a half hours I read this book. Then I went and told her what I found. Then I processed it. Then I went back and reread significant portions. Then I went back and told her some more. Then I had to write whole huge PDF on it. Yeah, I went through this book.
Victoria Z. I hope you came back. You were in the chat a minute ago. You got to go with your intuition, Victoria. You were right. Shiva shampoo. I'm sorry. I have been deluged with all kinds of personal stuff. I've barely been have time to do videos lately. I squeeze a video out. I'm not ignoring you, Shiva. I'll get to you on email. I really want to do that video. Hit those likes. You hit the likes on the first video. Hit the likes on this one. Yeah.
The names are going by too fast. Nemesis Bex. When I see you again. Hey, Rhino from Texas. If I see you again, I'll give you that wrench clay's pigeon. You're going to type slower so the chat moves slower. That's goodbye.
All right, so I got had two books here until all this excitement broke loose. Now I don't know what I did with them. Damn. Oh, well, I'll just tell you, that's crazy.
Anyway, we've taken Big John, took all the pictures necessary for I'm doing a special presentation on Easter Island. The moai, the big giant heads, that whole civilization. It's going to be Chronographical and pictorial. You're going to see pictures, man, that very few people have seen. You're going to see things that have been discovered on Easter Island that they don't really talk about because it messes up all their historical established chronologies. You're going to see a lot of that material now you're not.
Easter island is not the only one, though. We're going to go deep off into the crystal skull. We've already done all the image harvesting from all these images we're showing are from books that we have in our library. A lot of pictures of Easter Island and the crystal skull found in Lubantim or something. Central America. Yeah, it's really fascinating stuff, but those two videos are coming real fast.
Had an arcade TV. I had an arcade TV video, but this right here stopped all that. Getting this in the mail stopped all that. So my Santa Fe, September 9. Santa Fe, New Mexico. Corn cafe. I don't know, man. I don't know. Got a few more people.
Quantum paradox. How you doing? Jamie Robbins always here. I'm glad I had that backup camera out the case. Needed that. Thank you, McKee. It all right. Chat going 100 miles an hour. Think we're ready to begin. Oh, I see a nemesis bex. Okay, this coffee you it all right. Cosmic Guru, how old is the book? The Phoenix Hypothesis apparently was published seven days ago. Yeah, it's hard to believe. Seven days ago.
So got it real fast. I don't know who sent it to me. There there's some basically the first half of the book essentially starts off as an overview of the entire truth or movement. Different elements involved, different narratives at play. And it's pretty good. It doesn't really have anything to do with Phoenix material. There's really very little crossover.
But this book is absolutely necessary because it cannot be misunderstood that this is supported by archaics. In no way does this book support the Phoenix phenomenon. It's not even connected remotely to my research. Other than citing a bunch of my material. colloquials Adages a lot of the people I cite, different authors and research people I've had on my channel that I've talked to, it goes into depth citing those sources. But as far as crossover between the Phoenix phenomenon and there's not a lot.
So we need to address certain issues. Overall, it's a very well written book, but I do have some issues with the book, so I'm going to give it its praise as an overview of the truth or movement going back to the invention of the term conspiracy theory, coming all the way up to modern day to the old pandemic crisis. It's a really good, very informative overview of basically all the multiple narratives going out.
Now I will say this, christian Kohler is the author of this book, The Phoenix Hypothesis. There are things that just can't be denied. There is no doubt whatsoever within my mind that he was not heavily influenced by Archaic's material. Well, he admits this in the book, there's no doubt. So to the extent, though, I don't know.
However, we need to goWhat's his name colhurt. I don't know how you say your name, man, so you have to forgive me if you're in the chat, but Christian Colhurt, prior to him publishing his Phoenix Hypothesis and even changing the name from the older Cassandra Hypothesis.
Prior to that, I had already released three published books on the Phoenix history in the Phoenix phenomenon, the Phoenix Chronology, what the Elite Know about the Phoenix and all that, as well as 75 videos on YouTube. So the information was already out there and had been out there for a very long time.
Having reviewed the email, I went to his website and I looked at the Cassandra Hypothesis, and I didn't find any overlap. I read the entire it's still there. It's there right now. I went to his website, looked at The Cassandra Hypothesis, I read through it, and I didn't see any coordinates with Archaics. I'm like, okay, what's up?
I would have never been interested to begin with. It was something that I would have looked at and say, oh yeah, you know what, you're probably right about this. Probably was going down. This is what was happening during 2020, this is what was happening around the world with the elite. All that, I probably would have agreed, I don't know.
But the claim that the Phoenix Hypothesis is merely a change of title from The Cassandra Hypothesis, he did say he added to it, he had edited, he had done all that. But it's a fundamentally different document. And this is what I want to get, I want to get into that before we even start this book. So I'm going to let it be known right now. The Cassandra Hypothesis, just before, this is what he wrote before it was the Phoenix Hypothesis.
Now on his website, the Cassandra Hypothesis is dated to November 2022. That means somebody else has been on the website and miss dated it, moved it into a new file, did something, because that's wrong, because his email says that the Phoenix Hypothesis is what came out of the Cassandra Hypothesis. So the Cassandra Hypothesis must have just recently been posted on his website, because the date for the post is November 2022. However, the Phoenix Hypothesis was published in German by Nexus magazine as early as October of 2022. So there's a mistake on his website. That means nothing. It doesn't mean anything. I'm just saying I did notice that.
So I'm going to tell you right now that the Cassandra Hypothesis does not mention at all the names and research of Hans Bellamy, of David Hatchard childress, of Zechariah Sitchin or Velikovsky Andrew Tomas. It does not mention the evolution cruncher book. It does not mention Dr. Paul of Violet in that original thesis of his or Douglas Vogue. Now, all of these are heavily featured in Archaics, and I'm going somewhere with this. Now, none of those appeared in the original Cassandra Hypothesis, but all of them appear in the newly retitled The Phoenix Hypothesis.
So. More so. The Phoenix Hypothesis also mentions Phoenix phenomena. So those of you, especially Mark ACHA's, veterans, you already know where I'm going with this whole narrative right here. You already know that all these are very firmly well established on my channel. Christian says that his thesis is independent of one's belief in a flat Earth or a globe. That the elite academic academia discovered the cycle of cataclysm in the 1980s. The funding of black ops projects and deep underground military bases is done by the elite through different projects. Ancient advanced civilizations like Darren Kuyu were built underground a long time ago. You guys know I've talked about it a lot. Anatolia hittite anatolia the disappearance of supplies and products during the Pandemic were redirected to underground facilities during 2020. During the Pandemic guys, and the Pandemic itself was a total diversion. And that Trump and Putin are merely just players on a stage, puppets fulfilling a role.
So all of this is very familiar to you guys. I don't have to remind you which videos to watch. That's all very familiar to you. He also mentions, christian also mentions that after the cataclysm, people will come back up from the dumbs. Also that the elite have run their own simulations.
So I mentioned all these things to you because you already know that for the past three years, hell, my very first video, I come out the gate talking about half of that right there. I mentioned almost every element of that in my very first video on the Phoenix phenomenon.
So the reason I'm going at that was that is because we're going to have a lot of people trying to bridge the Phoenix phenomenon with the Phoenix Hypothesis. And they're not alike. They're not alike at all. But where they are alike are in areas that I'm really not comfortable with. One of them is the fact is that this author of The Phoenix Hypothesis basically asserts that the Phoenix Hypothesis is about the control systems used by the elite to distract the population while they're waiting for a cyclical cataclysm to occur.
Now, that's a very fundamental teaching on my channel repackaged as the Phoenix Hypothesis, but with significant differences. And that's what this video is about. It's the differences that I'm not comfortable with at all. And I need to put some distance between what is promoted on archaics and what Christian Kohler is promoting in this book.
So that does not in any way dissuade you from buying the book. Make your own minds up. But I'm about to read you some several significant passages. So now Mr. Kohler has ample opportunity he's all over Facebook. He has ample opportunity to defend his position. This PDF, the link will be downloadable for everybody because everything I'm mentioning in this video is in this PDF. It will be free, just like my other videos. You just download the PDF. So he's more than welcome to defend his position.
But it does not look good that you sent me an email in October twelveTH telling me that you had released a video earlier to the German Nexus magazine and titled it The Phoenix Hypothesis. And in the same email claimed that you had just discovered me and had no idea about my research in Archaics, and you're excited about diving in. And yet when I go look at the English translation for the German Nexus magazine, I find all the elements that I just read on this video which are straight out of Archaics, almost in the order that I have presented them.
So this is not totally damning. I mean, I've often agreed that I want people to share my material, get the word out, but this book does more than share the material, and I'm going to get to that. So perhaps it's just a coincidence, but I will say that I'm a stickler for details. A lot of things jumped out at me in the PDF. You'll be able to see the very opening picture has all the disinfo agents Epstein and all these evil people, and all these gatekeepers, they're all in this picture, guys. TheyCyclical pole shift could explain many of their OD behavior. I got many videos talking about why the elite do what they do, guys. So all I'm doing is I'm illustrating points showing that I was told in an email that my research did not influence that original article. And yet that original article, all the tenets I just listed for you, came straight out of Archaics, almost in the order of my presentations. So I have a problem with that it's not so much that somebody uses the material. I invite that. But why be deceitful about it? Why not be honest that you did that? Don't publish a book. Expos facto after you have already published my material in another language without citing me one time, then come back and publish a book now citing me as if this is going to clean it up. I'm not cool with the deceit. And this is exactly what I'm seeing here. So I haven't even read to you all the passages yet. I'm just reading you the little pieces about his theory on the Phoenix Hypothesis.
Because we got to be careful here. We have to separate the Phoenix Hypothesis from the Phoenix phenomenon because what he's promoting in this book isn't even tantamount to anything that I'm promoting at all. Yeah, so we need to go through this, guys. 174. Good thing I got no light in here. Yeah, this booklet in my Bible now. I marked it up. The Phoenix Hypothesis can help dissolve the terror of the unknown threat by showing that global events indeed follow an inner logic. Change those words up a little bit and it sounds just like one of my videos. 175. My fundamental message as the author of this thesis is I don't even want to read the rest of that. I'm just showing you the sentence structure. The Phoenix Hypothesis is not an independent theory, but an alternative model based on various complex science fields. I want to give an overview of the most significant people who inspired the Phoenix Hypothesis. We'll get to that here in a little while because that's really interesting that I was not included on that list. So the following individuals yeah, we'll get to that. Yeah, I'm going to get to that. Later in the presentation, he lists a whole bunch of individuals in the back of this book. I'm not one of them, and yet I should be. And you'll understand once I read all these quotes. So I am featured in the book starting at page 127. In all fairness, there is no way that I can, in all honesty, do this video without reading this to you guys, because the man was very honest in his assessment of who I am and what I've accomplished. He did that. But then sometimes you have to wonder why somebody took the time to do that. I'm going to let you guys make the decision by the end of the video. But in the interest of all fairness, I have to read what he wrote about me before I read anything else. The first time I mentioned is page 127. Get your coffee out. There's a couple of pages. Christian Kohler, The Phoenix Hypothesis. Also, I must mention Jason Brashears, who has become known as archaics. It was his work that made me aware of the fact of the cycle expected by the elites was associated with the Phoenix in ancient times. It is from this fact that the hypothesis borrows its name. His research inspired me greatly, so he shall be treated here first.
Jason Brashears and the Phoenix jason Brashears is an expert in ancient literature and synchronizing old calendar systems. His wealth of knowledge and the gigantic data collection of his research has no equivalent. The exceptional circumstances that allowed him as a single individual to consolidate such a treasure trove of data are, unfortunately, also the most considerable criticism of his person. However, his story is so fascinating that I would like to summarize it here.
Jason Bershiers, as the son of a minor mother, was given up for adoption to a fundamentalist Baptist family. From an early age, he was indoctrinated into a radical interpretation of the Bible that controlled every aspect of his life. His foster mother served in a high position in the local church congregation and drilled her son from the beginning to study extensive religious texts and meticulously summarize the content. Young Jason's near photographic memory helped him internalize the names, places and times within the documents. Even without his mother's insistence, he loved to read. However, he had to regularly work through a considerable volume of Christian literature to earn the right to a specifically chosen book of his own device. This sometimes inhuman training practically shaped Jason into a top text analyst athlete.
In the final analysis, Bersheeers rebelled as a teenager against the community's rigid dogma and left the family's constraints. He drifted aimlessly, earning a living partially as a day laborer. Despite rebelling against the old puritan ideology of the Baptist church, he initially remained true to his instilled faith. However, this did not keep him from getting going, astray the downward spiral resulted in extended criminal record of minor convictions. This trajectory escalated into a situation that earned him nearly 30 years in prison. Herein lies the major criticism that makes Jason Brashears a polarizing figure who would trust a convicted capital offender who had sprung from religious extremism. But of all things, here lies the second tragic key that allowed Jason to become archaics. Fate banished him to several correctional facilities that practically overflowed with ancient books. Entire wings of Texas prisons were stacked to the ceiling with sometimes rare writings from old renowned libraries that the state nola had to close. A high performance reader was practically locked up in libraries with exquisite ancient and classical texts for almost three decades. In addition, his Christian indoctrination commanded him to derive biblical history from old historical books. Retrospectively, one would like to believe, in higher providence. His imprisonment provided him with ample material.
In time, moreover, he became the archivist of the prison libraries where he was incarcerated, and thus could freely exchange books between other institutions. If he found references in his studies to publications not available in his facility, there were ways to obtain them from other units. Even the most passionate professors and scholars are forced at some point to devote themselves to mundane daily life. These obligations are inevitable because they may have to lecture, have a family life, or even lose themselves in distractions at times. But Jason had no diversion and can only sit in his cell and read. For him, a sense of mental freedom always came with a concentration on written content. The imprisoned body evaporated in the background noise. The story's immersion took over his mind and allowed him to drive into other worlds. After a short time, Jason's fanatical attempt to prove the Bible's historical authenticity failed. More and more discrepancies appeared, which could not be ignored even by a selection of the sources. He realized that the Bible was full of manipulations. This hindsight ushered a painful break with his old paradigm, which had been forced into his mind from his early childhood. The phenomenon that emerges in such cases is called cognitive dissonance. In this case, an intellectual conviction collides with a new insight that can no longer be ignored in terms of validity. Most truth errs know this feeling, although the effect can manifest differently. The more rigid and complex the Old Worldview was, the more jarring the breakdown when the mental construct implodes. But Jason Bershiers did not give up on himself, only on his faith. Bersheers continued to study and absorb everything he could find. Thus he had nothing better to do and plenty of time. On top of that, Jason left the Christian context and opened himself to all philosophical religious writings. The shift could be understood as a gnostic approach. He read the Quran inHere is the reformatted text into natural paragraphs:
Explain. So listen, I know you guys respect Doug vote. I'm going to respect that. But quit mentioning the man to me. Our data doesn't sink. It doesn't matter if somebody is identifying the same future year. Douglas Vote puts it out like it's the Die Hold Foundation conclusions, scientific conclusions that give it's not. He got the 2046 date using a Bible verse and using a computer program that shows him what the geometrical value of that verse is, and it equal 2046. And he made the cognitive leap from that Bible verse, which has nothing to do with that event, and thinks that that's the sum of all the scientific material that's been put out. You're taking two unknowns, adding them together and claiming to know something. I'm not with it. I'm not with it.
Anyway, this is what the man said about me, and I appreciate that, and he and I may be friends in the future, but we have unresolved issues with this book because you guys are going to see the evidence that I don't think it's just an innocent book. As a matter of fact, my publisher can't even afford who funded this? My publisher can't even afford I Googled this publisher. I couldn't find a single other book by this publisher. It might be self-published or whatever, but it cost money to put out a hardback book and then distribute it. I know. I've got 17 books published and not one of them is a hardback book. Oh, my publisher can afford the paperback books. Yeah, but this right here, yeah, I'm a little jealous.
Let's go to page 35. What happened on page 35? Let's see. On page 35, we have a reference together of the Maya of the Hindus and the dreamtime of the aboriginals being evidence of a false reality. But I mean, Christian could have got that anywhere. He didn't have to get that for me. But following right after that, we have a reference on page 66 to a book called Moon's, Myth and man by Hans Bellamy, which I mentioned in about six different videos. I even did a whole video on it on that book just recently. Right after that, we got references to Dumbs and we've got references to Darren Kuyu. We got references to resources being diverted by the elite into these Dumbs. On page 89 on page 105, we got references to staged UFO panic and the spy balloon episode China. Now, anybody could have been talking about all those, but I also know that my live presentations, I've been talking about all these things and recently, page 169, you don't get a pass on this one. Page 169, mankind needs only 200 years to progress from horse and buggy to quantum computer. Now, I normally say hadron collider, you changed it up and that's okay. I don't have a copyright on that statement. On page 169 you guys know I did two popular videos concerning the research of Andrew Tomas. I just did those videos recently. Within the last four months on two road trips ago to California, I showed all the scenery. The book was called We Are Not the first and it's relied on it here. But what makes it really suspect is that's on page 169, we are not the first. It's also Evolution Cruncher by Vance Farrell is also mentioned on page 169. Listen, I don't mind people using my material because it's these other research. It's meant to be shared, but there seems to be a and I'm going to show direct proof of it, but there seems to be a lot of borrowing and only assigning certain portions to be from Jason of Archaics. However, it seems like a large body of materials from Jason archaics. But I'm going to show you, since you guys know, I'm not about telling you anything. I'm about showing you. I say that all the time, too.
So page 170 again, the correlate between Jason and Doug Vote. So let's look at page 36 and 37. Let's read some passages here because your opinion matters more. You guys are far more objective than I am because I'm in a subjective position right now critiquing a book that's real close to trying to pass off as something that I've spent years building. This is easy to get away with. There's a lot of things named Phoenix now, I will say this. There's not a lot of things named Phoenix phenomenon or Phoenix Thesis or like I'm always talking about the Phoenix phenomenon and the Phoenix thesis. I say those at least three or four times a week in videos. But the Phoenix Hypothesis, I don't think I've ever said that. So I can't accuse the man of anything. But that's a real telling title. But what really gives it away, though, is the fact is that this Phoenix Hypothesis is still about the elite. And it's still about what the elite believe about the Phoenix. And it's still about what the elite are preparing. For and how they're preparing for it, and how they're using the media, how they're building underground domes, how they're using people like Trump and Putin as a stage to keep people distracted. It's all in this book. It's all in this book. But it's presented as if none of this material came from me and that Jason is just a really unique individual who has influenced these writings.
But listen, guys, I'm going to read you the passages, what we got on page 36. What does this sound like? The evolution of spacetime spanning quantum computers and the exponential development of highly immersive simulations. Assume that we already live in a form of a similichrum. At least it seems more than plausible. This is the first use of simulacrum. You know my word similicrum in this book. It's the first use. I don't own that word. I don't own that word at all. But the entire truth or community knows that. I recently brought it back toward the table from an old 400 year old Latin dictionary. They know that now. It's the word everywhere. And that's cool. I'm cool with that. I didn't invent that word. Matter of fact, right here in his bibliography, he's got a nice little citation right here in Latin showing where it derives and what it means. All right here. He didn't have to cite me. I didn't invent the word. With this model, all the paradoxes and anomalies in collective reality can be argued in a unified way. All contradictory phenomena can be put into one coherent picture, from reincarnation to bigfoot or even lizard people, if you want. Accordingly, the flat Earth theory is merely an insignificant intermediate step towards the realization that our planet is neither flat nor round, but only a virtual construct. Apparently, this is a part of the Phoenix Hypothesis.
So really what I'm getting to here is I'm going to continue reading these, but shouldn't this whole situation have gone down like, hey, man, I want to open up an archaics chapter in Germany, man. Can I get your blessing? You know I would have sent that, man. You guys already know I'd have sent him four thumb drives with more data than a man can read in his life. Why? Because I've already done it for several people. Yeah, hundreds of chartsSure, I'll reformat the text into natural paragraphs for easier reading:
Their virtual characters and often react emotionally when they pass away. This attachment doesn't even require a visual representation.
In one of his podcasts, Jason Brashears reported on his experience with a board game Dungeons and Dragons, during his time in prison. According to his account, even hardened felons occasionally burst into tears when their developed altered ego was struck by death.
The sentence that mentions me does so as if I'm providing supporting evidence for the assertion that he made on his own. Did he make it on his own, or is he just not giving credit where credits due? This is my issue.
So page 181. I don't need to rewrite it all in the same sentence. He says, co-creators, that we're all co-creators. Again, he talks about the simulacrum.
Okay, it may be overkill to some of you guys, but you got to understand I was specifically told in an email that this man did not have any contact with the archaic's data. When he published this in Germany, when he published all this in German, in that article in Nexus magazine, I was told something that was not true.
And when I go online and I look at the English translation and like at the beginning of this video, I itemize this entire list of things that were indeed talked about. And I know for a fact they were all also the main topic of discussions in Archaic's videos. Then I have to wonder why this author thought it was so important to include that long passage about me in this book. Why?
So we have a lot of footnotes here, we don't need to read them all. But he's given me credit for Aix. Jason Bershier's coined Aix. He describes what Aix is. He does make a mistake. He says ancient Egyptian writings suggest that each stone in the Great Pyramid, the center of the world, represents an incarnate soul. That is not true. But I can understand how he made that mistake. Those are not ancient Egyptian texts that talk about that. Those are ancient hermetic texts. It's a big difference.
The Hermetic text, the pseudopigraphical Jewish text, and the shepherd of Hermes text, these are the texts that talk about each stone is the soul of man. But yeah, it's also the ancient Vedic text and the traditions of the Altar of Agony, which had 10,800 bricks for the 1080 anis Mundi date of the building of the Great Pyramid. I've already remember ancient Egyptian coffin text. 1080 is the same as the 1080 anis Mundi, the year the Great Pyramid was built. So all those are interconnected. That's an easy mistake to make. It's just not ancient Egyptian text talks about artificial intelligence, maya, Aix, all that, all that's good.
I mean, we already know, he already mentioned me over here about the Aix. But I have to go into detail for you guys here because you have to understand the man chose this name, the Phoenix Hypothesis. And it's basically talking about all the stuff I talk about in the Phoenix phenomenon in Archaics. So we have to separate here where's he going with this book. If you're going to use an immense amount of material that came from me and pretend that that material didn't come from me and that I only influenced your research, then we need to figure out what this book is really about. That's where we're going.
That's where we're going. Because this book isn't about what you think it is. I'm about to show you. Get a few more examples here.
187, page 192 talks about the Nemesis system. Now, as far as I know, I don't know of a single YouTuber, I don't know of any author, I don't know of anything. Nemesis is known because in 1983, which is research that I published in my published books and on my YouTube channel, which this man would have seen is 1983, two independent federal think tanks had two colleges basically go through all this scientific data, the exact same data. They were not allowed to communicate. They were given like six weeks to go through the data and write a thesis. What does this data mean? Both of them nailed it. That there is a cataclysm about to occur to our world. This is in 1983. It was published in 1984. Then it was turned into like a classified document for the federal government. This is the same time that the Iris Space Telescope had seen an object the size of Neptune at the edge of our system.
So that was in 1983. So what is it about 1983 that I just saw? I just saw something about 1983. What it was I lost where I was. Oh the nemesis. That's right. So as far as the Nemesis system being the origin of why we have two ecliptic planes and not one is, I've never seen that anywhere but in Archaics at all. So this is where the nemesis x object comes from. This is where Luna came from before the capture of Luna. This is where our world came from. This world here came from in the simulation. It's where it all came from. This is where all the calendars started. I've got multiple videos showing you how all these ancient calendars started. It was with the appearance of Phoenix. It was the appearance of the moon. It was the appearance of our world. Here started a calendar. It was the appearance of the nemesis X object. 34 39 BC. Killed one third of the world. It was when Enki appeared, later remembered over a thousand years later by the Jewish scribes in Babylon as Enoch. So all this yeah, the term Nemesis system, I've never seen that anywhere but in Archaics, except the gaming. I mean, it's a gaming term. Nemesis system is like role playing games. Nemesis system, it's in like Dungeons and Dragons, but it has nothing to do with a system of a collapsed binary. It's a trade off system.
So, page 200, I understand that his intent is to write to a German audience. That's fine. How do I interpret how am I supposed to interpret this? The author says, I would like to illuminate a few scientific concepts whose understanding is helpful to understand isolated arguments in the Phoenix Hypothesis better, since I have already in this book let the genie of simulation theory, or the idea of our reality as a virtual construct out of the bottle. You let that out of the bottle. I'm just going to move on, guys. If you think this is bad, if you think this is bad, I promise you, you should see the notations I made in Graham Hancock's books. One of these days I may just get tired and just unleash and show you all that cockamonian in those books. Tell you, my books in my library, they look like Bibles. I mark them up, not these old 18 hundreds books. We photocopy these.
So here it is on page 214 in late 2022So I was really surprised to see that 3600 years is promoted by him and the 12,000 year cycle. I have gone ad nauseam on my channel showing how ridiculous those theories are. Ad nauseam, but that's the establishment, the establishment is still pushing that material out. Promise you. And equally, I promise that Randall Carlson, Graham Hancock, Billy Carson, all these dudes that produce these narratives, promise you.
You guys know what? It's been a month or two since I've been calling people out. Not one person stepped up to the plate. I know for a fact Graham Hancock's already been put on notice. So I'm telling you guys, this narrative, these attacks, they're real guys. This book trying to hijack the narrative. Trying to hijack the narrative.
This book leaves ancient aliens and alien invasions still on the table. Of course it can, because it denies the construct. We're on a planet right here. It's in this book. Now.
Also, there is nobody who can watch all my Phoenix videos and not get exposed to the compelling research about Nostradamus that I have shown, the mathematical interpretation of the quattrains, how they are codified, how Nostradamus mentioned. The Phoenix knew about 19, two knew about 2040. Codified, the 138 year Periodicity of the Phoenix, said the sun was going to go dark, the moon was going to turn red, stones are going to fall from the sky. And he did it in four different quadrants that are all dated 2040 in Mario readings, date index.
Not a hint of that in here. Instead, this man cast dispersions excuse me, aspersions At Nostradamus says, it says his material was flowery and just poetry. You got to watch out for that stuff, guys. Really got to watch out for that, because here's three things you really need to know about on page 72. What is archaics. What is Archaics, guys, it's an acronym. Advanced research of chronological history, of artificial intelligence. X archaics is chronology based. This man avoided chronology like the plague. In addition to that, he denigrated it on page 72. He basically told his readers, do not pay attention to chronological models. He said that in this book. So he's willing to call material from the very source that he also denigrates. Yeah, I'm not cool with that at all. Not at all.
And of course he also says that, but the elite know the times. Yeah, it says it in the same paragraph on page 123. One of my biggest problems. And then we're done. Page 123. I'm not convinced that this wasn't all intentional. Twice in this book he provides a list of authors. Listen to this. He can give me all the praise he wants. He spent three pages, four pages giving me praise. He cited me in his bibliography two or three times, although there's about 80 independent facts out of this book. Whole paragraph straight out of my material. That's fine. That's fine. But despite all of that, this is what he says suppose I had to think about summarizing all the publications of Eric von Daniken, David Hatcher, Childress, Graham Hancock, Brad Steger, andrew Tomas, Hans Bellamy, and many other authors. I'm not listed anywhere in there. He knows I'm a published author. He knows I've put a chronological history of the world for which I have challenged many people, and not one person has stepped up to meet that challenge. A debate or anything. Write a thesis. I don't care. I will dissect anything in writing that comes my way. I'm going to give it the same attention I gave to this I don't care. I'm not listed in that. Therefore, I don't bring the value that he's trying to convey Graham Hancock's on this list.
But it goes deeper than that, because the back of the book. The back of the book. Chapter Seven appendix biography of Important Individuals. He goes in here and he basically says, I put my thesis together. This is what he's claiming, I put my thesis together based off Charles Hapgood. Wow. Archaics focuses on Charles Hapgood quite a bit. Con Thomas. He's the one that wrote the Adam and Eve deal. How much of you heard about the Adam and Eve reset on my channel, and I provided way more data than Khan or Can Thomas did for his little CIA redacted deal. Emmanuel Velikovsky. All authors that I cite. Alois Iremere. This is a German. I wouldn't know anything about him. This is a German seer, not a researcher. He's somebody who adds clairvoyant. Claire audio. I don't know anything about him, but this is his source. Some German seer.
Edgar Casey. Another seer. That's not somebody I'm going to cite as a credible source. I'm just not. Edgar Casey put out almost pin, perfect precision medical diagnoses and prognosis under hypnosis. He did that when it came to historical things like the Great Pyramid and all that. He nailed a bunch of stuff. His track record for prophecy is terrible. His predictions are awful. Edgar Casey. Carlos. Carlos Munaz Farada, another mystic seer, I don't know much about him. I don't know much about him, but he's important to this guy. This guy said these are the guys that mainly influenced him when he put together his thesis. Again, Jason's not mentioned anywhere in that list. This is the second list of authors that he provides. This is an appendix.
Yeah. It goes off into all kinds of different concepts, and it breakaway civilizations. Everything here is mentioned by me, but it's also mentioned by other authors, too, so I'm not even worried about that. But yeah, the main problem I have with The Phoenix Hypothesis is that you can't call a tremendous amount of data you're probably watching videos. I don't know how you do it, but you call all this material and then rewrite it, change the sentence structure to make it look like these are your original ideas and not mine, and then turn around and publish huge sections that are 100% influenced from what you you saw or what you read in my published books. I can't accept that when you won't even include me into the two main lists of authors that you highly value, and to take the name The Phoenix Hypothesis and yet not promote anything from where you got this material. Yeah, guys, you have to understand, this book's not about the Phoenix phenomenon. So I can't accuse him of stealing the Phoenix phenomenon material. It's not about the Phoenix phenomenon. It's basically promoting almost the exact opposite of everything that I teach in Archaics. This is a 100% materialist book. He does go for a small period. He goes into the spiritual stuff, but it's an absolute copy of my material on howPlease reformat this text into natural paragraphs for easy reading. Do not add any new text or punctuation. Do not summarize. Do not remove text or censor. Here is the text:
Face tucked in that picture like that. And they shaded the side of my face to make it look just like the shading on that pyramid.
Download the PDF.
Listen, I've already uploaded the PDF. The PDF is already on Podia right now. All I got to do is take the link and put it in the description box. And I'm about to do that right now.
Summary
➡ The speaker discusses the work of Christian Colhurt, particularly his Phoenix Hypothesis, emphasizing its similarities to his own published work on the Phoenix. He articulates his discomfort with certain aspects of Colhurt’s work and questions its originality, wondering if his own Archaics research was used. Despite this, the speaker clarifies that his audience should make their own judgments about Colhurt’s work. He also mentions discrepancies in the dating of Colhurt’s work on his website. Finally, he questions the repetitive use of ‘Phoenix Hypothesis’ in the text, making it sound like his own repeated use of ‘Archaics’.
➡ The text delves into the work, story and research of Jason Brashears, known as Archaics, who has extensively studied ancient literature and calendar systems, leading to the Phoenix Hypothesis which details the cyclical nature of global catastrophic events. Noted for his exceptional learning-curve developed during a 30-year imprisonment, the text questions whether his criminal record affects his credibility as a researcher. However, his immense knowledge, dedication to reading and research, and comprehensive understanding of history based on cyclical resets is highly praised.
-
Archaix, a prominent authority on the Phoenix phenomenon, unveils the intriguing secrets behind this extraordinary 138-year global reset. He delves into the manipulation of history by the Elites, aiming to supress the dissemination of this invaluable knowledge. Prepare for a captivating and unparalleled journey.
Video Summary
Summary
- The author of the text discusses technical issues with his camera equipment, announces a meet-up in Santa Fe, New Mexico, and promises upcoming videos about Easter Island and the Crystal Skull. He also discusses processing through a new book titled 'The Phoenix Hypothesis,' which heavily cites his research but doesn't support his 'Phoenix phenonmenon' theory. His analysis of this book uncovers elements of genius, questionable data sources, and significant disagreement with his own teachings.- The speaker discusses the work of Christian Colhurt, particularly his Phoenix Hypothesis, emphasizing its similarities to his own published work on the Phoenix. He articulates his discomfort with certain aspects of Colhurt's work and questions its originality, wondering if his own Archaics research was used. Despite this, the speaker clarifies that his audience should make their own judgments about Colhurt's work. He also mentions discrepancies in the dating of Colhurt's work on his website. Finally, he questions the repetitive use of 'Phoenix Hypothesis' in the text, making it sound like his own repeated use of 'Archaics'.- The text delves into the work, story and research of Jason Brashears, known as Archaics, who has extensively studied ancient literature and calendar systems, leading to the Phoenix Hypothesis which details the cyclical nature of global catastrophic events. Noted for his exceptional learning-curve developed during a 30-year imprisonment, the text questions whether his criminal record affects his credibility as a researcher. However, his immense knowledge, dedication to reading and research, and comprehensive understanding of history based on cyclical resets is highly praised.
- The speaker complains about perceived plagiarism of his ideas regarding simulation theory, the polarization of the Truth movement, and the manipulation by elite organizations, in a book by another author named Jason; he argues that his theories have been borrowed heavily but not appropriately credited.- The author discusses his issues with a writer appropriating his research theory, known as the Phoenix Hypothesis, in a book without attributing credit or context accurately. The author criticizes that this writer's interpretations and applications of the theory diverge significantly from its original intent, notably omitting crucial aspects such as the 138-year periodicity, cycles of destruction and resets, and evidence of a computerized existence. His concern extends to the impact this could have on understanding and disseminating the accurate theory, especially when it's presented in a misleading manner.- The author expresses deep dissatisfaction and frustration with a book titled 'The Phoenix Hypothesis', accusing the writer of plagiarizing his ideas and theories, promoting opposite viewpoints and attempting to steer the narrative away from his own research while failing to credit him. He believes this might be part of a greater effort to control the international conversation on the Phoenix phenomenon.- The speaker has compared their facial shading in a picture with a pyramid, indicating a PDF has been uploaded to Podia and the link will be added to the description box shortly. '
'
Video Transcription
Summary
Video TranscriptionNo, it's not a conspiracy. They didn't take me down. Sorry, guys. That was absolutely me. I'm on a backup camera because this little bad boy that's crystal clear that I normally use, I forgot to recharge the battery. It sorry about that. That's why I got this backup camera. Just let me know my audio is good. We got to get into this one. We got to get into it's. Good. Audio is good. Excellent.
Well, on September 9, the crew and I are going to be in Santa Fe, New Mexico. And if you want to come do a meet up, we're going to be at the Blue Corn Cafe and Brewery. Think that's about 1230 noon. 1230 Santa Fe, New Mexico.
I slowed that chat down. It's still going fast. Waiting for a few more people to catch up in a chat. I know I gave people the old switcheroo and they abandoned, and that's cool. This video is not meant for everybody, but it's going to be a good one.
Got this book in the mail last night. I read it. In about four and a half hours, I was done. I processed what I read for about an hour and a half, went back and reread significant portions, put it all together and realize exactly what I was dealing with. And I'm going to let you guys have the I know.
I know what mic it is. Brock. Lucas. You're right. I've already disengaged that microphone. I'm on the mic that's attached to the other camera. I don't have time to do all these reconfigurations. This right here had its own setup. It has the whole focus right, set up. It's got all these other devices that get a cloud lifter. The cloud lifter, focus, right? Everything went through here. This is my backup. It just goes straight into my computer. It's my emergency microphone and camera.
Monica Pharaoh. Hey. Hey. Monica. Been around since way before I had a thousand subs. You've been around for a while, too. Nemesis. Becks, you want a moderator? Wrench, you let me know. You've been around for a while. How you doing, New Zealand? I'm waiting for a few more people to get in the chat before we start this amazing video.
Because, guys, when I do a deep dive in a book and this book's, the one I did a deep dive on, I read this entire book. Don will tell you because I totally ignored her the whole four and a half hours I read this book. Then I went and told her what I found. Then I processed it. Then I went back and reread significant portions. Then I went back and told her some more. Then I had to write whole huge PDF on it. Yeah, I went through this book.
Victoria Z. I hope you came back. You were in the chat a minute ago. You got to go with your intuition, Victoria. You were right. Shiva shampoo. I'm sorry. I have been deluged with all kinds of personal stuff. I've barely been have time to do videos lately. I squeeze a video out. I'm not ignoring you, Shiva. I'll get to you on email. I really want to do that video. Hit those likes. You hit the likes on the first video. Hit the likes on this one. Yeah.
The names are going by too fast. Nemesis Bex. When I see you again. Hey, Rhino from Texas. If I see you again, I'll give you that wrench clay's pigeon. You're going to type slower so the chat moves slower. That's goodbye.
All right, so I got had two books here until all this excitement broke loose. Now I don't know what I did with them. Damn. Oh, well, I'll just tell you, that's crazy.
Anyway, we've taken Big John, took all the pictures necessary for I'm doing a special presentation on Easter Island. The moai, the big giant heads, that whole civilization. It's going to be Chronographical and pictorial. You're going to see pictures, man, that very few people have seen. You're going to see things that have been discovered on Easter Island that they don't really talk about because it messes up all their historical established chronologies. You're going to see a lot of that material now you're not.
Easter island is not the only one, though. We're going to go deep off into the crystal skull. We've already done all the image harvesting from all these images we're showing are from books that we have in our library. A lot of pictures of Easter Island and the crystal skull found in Lubantim or something. Central America. Yeah, it's really fascinating stuff, but those two videos are coming real fast.
Had an arcade TV. I had an arcade TV video, but this right here stopped all that. Getting this in the mail stopped all that. So my Santa Fe, September 9. Santa Fe, New Mexico. Corn cafe. I don't know, man. I don't know. Got a few more people.
Quantum paradox. How you doing? Jamie Robbins always here. I'm glad I had that backup camera out the case. Needed that. Thank you, McKee. It all right. Chat going 100 miles an hour. Think we're ready to begin. Oh, I see a nemesis bex. Okay, this coffee you it all right. Cosmic Guru, how old is the book? The Phoenix Hypothesis apparently was published seven days ago. Yeah, it's hard to believe. Seven days ago.
So got it real fast. I don't know who sent it to me. There there's some basically the first half of the book essentially starts off as an overview of the entire truth or movement. Different elements involved, different narratives at play. And it's pretty good. It doesn't really have anything to do with Phoenix material. There's really very little crossover.
But this book is absolutely necessary because it cannot be misunderstood that this is supported by archaics. In no way does this book support the Phoenix phenomenon. It's not even connected remotely to my research. Other than citing a bunch of my material. colloquials Adages a lot of the people I cite, different authors and research people I've had on my channel that I've talked to, it goes into depth citing those sources. But as far as crossover between the Phoenix phenomenon and there's not a lot.
So we need to address certain issues. Overall, it's a very well written book, but I do have some issues with the book, so I'm going to give it its praise as an overview of the truth or movement going back to the invention of the term conspiracy theory, coming all the way up to modern day to the old pandemic crisis. It's a really good, very informative overview of basically all the multiple narratives going out.
Now I will say this, christian Kohler is the author of this book, The Phoenix Hypothesis. There are things that just can't be denied. There is no doubt whatsoever within my mind that he was not heavily influenced by Archaic's material. Well, he admits this in the book, there's no doubt. So to the extent, though, I don't know.
However, we need to goWhat's his name colhurt. I don't know how you say your name, man, so you have to forgive me if you're in the chat, but Christian Colhurt, prior to him publishing his Phoenix Hypothesis and even changing the name from the older Cassandra Hypothesis.
Prior to that, I had already released three published books on the Phoenix history in the Phoenix phenomenon, the Phoenix Chronology, what the Elite Know about the Phoenix and all that, as well as 75 videos on YouTube. So the information was already out there and had been out there for a very long time.
Having reviewed the email, I went to his website and I looked at the Cassandra Hypothesis, and I didn't find any overlap. I read the entire it's still there. It's there right now. I went to his website, looked at The Cassandra Hypothesis, I read through it, and I didn't see any coordinates with Archaics. I'm like, okay, what's up?
I would have never been interested to begin with. It was something that I would have looked at and say, oh yeah, you know what, you're probably right about this. Probably was going down. This is what was happening during 2020, this is what was happening around the world with the elite. All that, I probably would have agreed, I don't know.
But the claim that the Phoenix Hypothesis is merely a change of title from The Cassandra Hypothesis, he did say he added to it, he had edited, he had done all that. But it's a fundamentally different document. And this is what I want to get, I want to get into that before we even start this book. So I'm going to let it be known right now. The Cassandra Hypothesis, just before, this is what he wrote before it was the Phoenix Hypothesis.
Now on his website, the Cassandra Hypothesis is dated to November 2022. That means somebody else has been on the website and miss dated it, moved it into a new file, did something, because that's wrong, because his email says that the Phoenix Hypothesis is what came out of the Cassandra Hypothesis. So the Cassandra Hypothesis must have just recently been posted on his website, because the date for the post is November 2022. However, the Phoenix Hypothesis was published in German by Nexus magazine as early as October of 2022. So there's a mistake on his website. That means nothing. It doesn't mean anything. I'm just saying I did notice that.
So I'm going to tell you right now that the Cassandra Hypothesis does not mention at all the names and research of Hans Bellamy, of David Hatchard childress, of Zechariah Sitchin or Velikovsky Andrew Tomas. It does not mention the evolution cruncher book. It does not mention Dr. Paul of Violet in that original thesis of his or Douglas Vogue. Now, all of these are heavily featured in Archaics, and I'm going somewhere with this. Now, none of those appeared in the original Cassandra Hypothesis, but all of them appear in the newly retitled The Phoenix Hypothesis.
So. More so. The Phoenix Hypothesis also mentions Phoenix phenomena. So those of you, especially Mark ACHA's, veterans, you already know where I'm going with this whole narrative right here. You already know that all these are very firmly well established on my channel. Christian says that his thesis is independent of one's belief in a flat Earth or a globe. That the elite academic academia discovered the cycle of cataclysm in the 1980s. The funding of black ops projects and deep underground military bases is done by the elite through different projects. Ancient advanced civilizations like Darren Kuyu were built underground a long time ago. You guys know I've talked about it a lot. Anatolia hittite anatolia the disappearance of supplies and products during the Pandemic were redirected to underground facilities during 2020. During the Pandemic guys, and the Pandemic itself was a total diversion. And that Trump and Putin are merely just players on a stage, puppets fulfilling a role.
So all of this is very familiar to you guys. I don't have to remind you which videos to watch. That's all very familiar to you. He also mentions, christian also mentions that after the cataclysm, people will come back up from the dumbs. Also that the elite have run their own simulations.
So I mentioned all these things to you because you already know that for the past three years, hell, my very first video, I come out the gate talking about half of that right there. I mentioned almost every element of that in my very first video on the Phoenix phenomenon.
So the reason I'm going at that was that is because we're going to have a lot of people trying to bridge the Phoenix phenomenon with the Phoenix Hypothesis. And they're not alike. They're not alike at all. But where they are alike are in areas that I'm really not comfortable with. One of them is the fact is that this author of The Phoenix Hypothesis basically asserts that the Phoenix Hypothesis is about the control systems used by the elite to distract the population while they're waiting for a cyclical cataclysm to occur.
Now, that's a very fundamental teaching on my channel repackaged as the Phoenix Hypothesis, but with significant differences. And that's what this video is about. It's the differences that I'm not comfortable with at all. And I need to put some distance between what is promoted on archaics and what Christian Kohler is promoting in this book.
So that does not in any way dissuade you from buying the book. Make your own minds up. But I'm about to read you some several significant passages. So now Mr. Kohler has ample opportunity he's all over Facebook. He has ample opportunity to defend his position. This PDF, the link will be downloadable for everybody because everything I'm mentioning in this video is in this PDF. It will be free, just like my other videos. You just download the PDF. So he's more than welcome to defend his position.
But it does not look good that you sent me an email in October twelveTH telling me that you had released a video earlier to the German Nexus magazine and titled it The Phoenix Hypothesis. And in the same email claimed that you had just discovered me and had no idea about my research in Archaics, and you're excited about diving in. And yet when I go look at the English translation for the German Nexus magazine, I find all the elements that I just read on this video which are straight out of Archaics, almost in the order that I have presented them.
So this is not totally damning. I mean, I've often agreed that I want people to share my material, get the word out, but this book does more than share the material, and I'm going to get to that. So perhaps it's just a coincidence, but I will say that I'm a stickler for details. A lot of things jumped out at me in the PDF. You'll be able to see the very opening picture has all the disinfo agents Epstein and all these evil people, and all these gatekeepers, they're all in this picture, guys. TheyCyclical pole shift could explain many of their OD behavior. I got many videos talking about why the elite do what they do, guys. So all I'm doing is I'm illustrating points showing that I was told in an email that my research did not influence that original article. And yet that original article, all the tenets I just listed for you, came straight out of Archaics, almost in the order of my presentations. So I have a problem with that it's not so much that somebody uses the material. I invite that. But why be deceitful about it? Why not be honest that you did that? Don't publish a book. Expos facto after you have already published my material in another language without citing me one time, then come back and publish a book now citing me as if this is going to clean it up. I'm not cool with the deceit. And this is exactly what I'm seeing here. So I haven't even read to you all the passages yet. I'm just reading you the little pieces about his theory on the Phoenix Hypothesis.
Because we got to be careful here. We have to separate the Phoenix Hypothesis from the Phoenix phenomenon because what he's promoting in this book isn't even tantamount to anything that I'm promoting at all. Yeah, so we need to go through this, guys. 174. Good thing I got no light in here. Yeah, this booklet in my Bible now. I marked it up. The Phoenix Hypothesis can help dissolve the terror of the unknown threat by showing that global events indeed follow an inner logic. Change those words up a little bit and it sounds just like one of my videos. 175. My fundamental message as the author of this thesis is I don't even want to read the rest of that. I'm just showing you the sentence structure. The Phoenix Hypothesis is not an independent theory, but an alternative model based on various complex science fields. I want to give an overview of the most significant people who inspired the Phoenix Hypothesis. We'll get to that here in a little while because that's really interesting that I was not included on that list. So the following individuals yeah, we'll get to that. Yeah, I'm going to get to that. Later in the presentation, he lists a whole bunch of individuals in the back of this book. I'm not one of them, and yet I should be. And you'll understand once I read all these quotes. So I am featured in the book starting at page 127. In all fairness, there is no way that I can, in all honesty, do this video without reading this to you guys, because the man was very honest in his assessment of who I am and what I've accomplished. He did that. But then sometimes you have to wonder why somebody took the time to do that. I'm going to let you guys make the decision by the end of the video. But in the interest of all fairness, I have to read what he wrote about me before I read anything else. The first time I mentioned is page 127. Get your coffee out. There's a couple of pages. Christian Kohler, The Phoenix Hypothesis. Also, I must mention Jason Brashears, who has become known as archaics. It was his work that made me aware of the fact of the cycle expected by the elites was associated with the Phoenix in ancient times. It is from this fact that the hypothesis borrows its name. His research inspired me greatly, so he shall be treated here first.
Jason Brashears and the Phoenix jason Brashears is an expert in ancient literature and synchronizing old calendar systems. His wealth of knowledge and the gigantic data collection of his research has no equivalent. The exceptional circumstances that allowed him as a single individual to consolidate such a treasure trove of data are, unfortunately, also the most considerable criticism of his person. However, his story is so fascinating that I would like to summarize it here.
Jason Bershiers, as the son of a minor mother, was given up for adoption to a fundamentalist Baptist family. From an early age, he was indoctrinated into a radical interpretation of the Bible that controlled every aspect of his life. His foster mother served in a high position in the local church congregation and drilled her son from the beginning to study extensive religious texts and meticulously summarize the content. Young Jason's near photographic memory helped him internalize the names, places and times within the documents. Even without his mother's insistence, he loved to read. However, he had to regularly work through a considerable volume of Christian literature to earn the right to a specifically chosen book of his own device. This sometimes inhuman training practically shaped Jason into a top text analyst athlete.
In the final analysis, Bersheeers rebelled as a teenager against the community's rigid dogma and left the family's constraints. He drifted aimlessly, earning a living partially as a day laborer. Despite rebelling against the old puritan ideology of the Baptist church, he initially remained true to his instilled faith. However, this did not keep him from getting going, astray the downward spiral resulted in extended criminal record of minor convictions. This trajectory escalated into a situation that earned him nearly 30 years in prison. Herein lies the major criticism that makes Jason Brashears a polarizing figure who would trust a convicted capital offender who had sprung from religious extremism. But of all things, here lies the second tragic key that allowed Jason to become archaics. Fate banished him to several correctional facilities that practically overflowed with ancient books. Entire wings of Texas prisons were stacked to the ceiling with sometimes rare writings from old renowned libraries that the state nola had to close. A high performance reader was practically locked up in libraries with exquisite ancient and classical texts for almost three decades. In addition, his Christian indoctrination commanded him to derive biblical history from old historical books. Retrospectively, one would like to believe, in higher providence. His imprisonment provided him with ample material.
In time, moreover, he became the archivist of the prison libraries where he was incarcerated, and thus could freely exchange books between other institutions. If he found references in his studies to publications not available in his facility, there were ways to obtain them from other units. Even the most passionate professors and scholars are forced at some point to devote themselves to mundane daily life. These obligations are inevitable because they may have to lecture, have a family life, or even lose themselves in distractions at times. But Jason had no diversion and can only sit in his cell and read. For him, a sense of mental freedom always came with a concentration on written content. The imprisoned body evaporated in the background noise. The story's immersion took over his mind and allowed him to drive into other worlds. After a short time, Jason's fanatical attempt to prove the Bible's historical authenticity failed. More and more discrepancies appeared, which could not be ignored even by a selection of the sources. He realized that the Bible was full of manipulations. This hindsight ushered a painful break with his old paradigm, which had been forced into his mind from his early childhood. The phenomenon that emerges in such cases is called cognitive dissonance. In this case, an intellectual conviction collides with a new insight that can no longer be ignored in terms of validity. Most truth errs know this feeling, although the effect can manifest differently. The more rigid and complex the Old Worldview was, the more jarring the breakdown when the mental construct implodes. But Jason Bershiers did not give up on himself, only on his faith. Bersheers continued to study and absorb everything he could find. Thus he had nothing better to do and plenty of time. On top of that, Jason left the Christian context and opened himself to all philosophical religious writings. The shift could be understood as a gnostic approach. He read the Quran inHere is the reformatted text into natural paragraphs:
Explain. So listen, I know you guys respect Doug vote. I'm going to respect that. But quit mentioning the man to me. Our data doesn't sink. It doesn't matter if somebody is identifying the same future year. Douglas Vote puts it out like it's the Die Hold Foundation conclusions, scientific conclusions that give it's not. He got the 2046 date using a Bible verse and using a computer program that shows him what the geometrical value of that verse is, and it equal 2046. And he made the cognitive leap from that Bible verse, which has nothing to do with that event, and thinks that that's the sum of all the scientific material that's been put out. You're taking two unknowns, adding them together and claiming to know something. I'm not with it. I'm not with it.
Anyway, this is what the man said about me, and I appreciate that, and he and I may be friends in the future, but we have unresolved issues with this book because you guys are going to see the evidence that I don't think it's just an innocent book. As a matter of fact, my publisher can't even afford who funded this? My publisher can't even afford I Googled this publisher. I couldn't find a single other book by this publisher. It might be self-published or whatever, but it cost money to put out a hardback book and then distribute it. I know. I've got 17 books published and not one of them is a hardback book. Oh, my publisher can afford the paperback books. Yeah, but this right here, yeah, I'm a little jealous.
Let's go to page 35. What happened on page 35? Let's see. On page 35, we have a reference together of the Maya of the Hindus and the dreamtime of the aboriginals being evidence of a false reality. But I mean, Christian could have got that anywhere. He didn't have to get that for me. But following right after that, we have a reference on page 66 to a book called Moon's, Myth and man by Hans Bellamy, which I mentioned in about six different videos. I even did a whole video on it on that book just recently. Right after that, we got references to Dumbs and we've got references to Darren Kuyu. We got references to resources being diverted by the elite into these Dumbs. On page 89 on page 105, we got references to staged UFO panic and the spy balloon episode China. Now, anybody could have been talking about all those, but I also know that my live presentations, I've been talking about all these things and recently, page 169, you don't get a pass on this one. Page 169, mankind needs only 200 years to progress from horse and buggy to quantum computer. Now, I normally say hadron collider, you changed it up and that's okay. I don't have a copyright on that statement. On page 169 you guys know I did two popular videos concerning the research of Andrew Tomas. I just did those videos recently. Within the last four months on two road trips ago to California, I showed all the scenery. The book was called We Are Not the first and it's relied on it here. But what makes it really suspect is that's on page 169, we are not the first. It's also Evolution Cruncher by Vance Farrell is also mentioned on page 169. Listen, I don't mind people using my material because it's these other research. It's meant to be shared, but there seems to be a and I'm going to show direct proof of it, but there seems to be a lot of borrowing and only assigning certain portions to be from Jason of Archaics. However, it seems like a large body of materials from Jason archaics. But I'm going to show you, since you guys know, I'm not about telling you anything. I'm about showing you. I say that all the time, too.
So page 170 again, the correlate between Jason and Doug Vote. So let's look at page 36 and 37. Let's read some passages here because your opinion matters more. You guys are far more objective than I am because I'm in a subjective position right now critiquing a book that's real close to trying to pass off as something that I've spent years building. This is easy to get away with. There's a lot of things named Phoenix now, I will say this. There's not a lot of things named Phoenix phenomenon or Phoenix Thesis or like I'm always talking about the Phoenix phenomenon and the Phoenix thesis. I say those at least three or four times a week in videos. But the Phoenix Hypothesis, I don't think I've ever said that. So I can't accuse the man of anything. But that's a real telling title. But what really gives it away, though, is the fact is that this Phoenix Hypothesis is still about the elite. And it's still about what the elite believe about the Phoenix. And it's still about what the elite are preparing. For and how they're preparing for it, and how they're using the media, how they're building underground domes, how they're using people like Trump and Putin as a stage to keep people distracted. It's all in this book. It's all in this book. But it's presented as if none of this material came from me and that Jason is just a really unique individual who has influenced these writings.
But listen, guys, I'm going to read you the passages, what we got on page 36. What does this sound like? The evolution of spacetime spanning quantum computers and the exponential development of highly immersive simulations. Assume that we already live in a form of a similichrum. At least it seems more than plausible. This is the first use of simulacrum. You know my word similicrum in this book. It's the first use. I don't own that word. I don't own that word at all. But the entire truth or community knows that. I recently brought it back toward the table from an old 400 year old Latin dictionary. They know that now. It's the word everywhere. And that's cool. I'm cool with that. I didn't invent that word. Matter of fact, right here in his bibliography, he's got a nice little citation right here in Latin showing where it derives and what it means. All right here. He didn't have to cite me. I didn't invent the word. With this model, all the paradoxes and anomalies in collective reality can be argued in a unified way. All contradictory phenomena can be put into one coherent picture, from reincarnation to bigfoot or even lizard people, if you want. Accordingly, the flat Earth theory is merely an insignificant intermediate step towards the realization that our planet is neither flat nor round, but only a virtual construct. Apparently, this is a part of the Phoenix Hypothesis.
So really what I'm getting to here is I'm going to continue reading these, but shouldn't this whole situation have gone down like, hey, man, I want to open up an archaics chapter in Germany, man. Can I get your blessing? You know I would have sent that, man. You guys already know I'd have sent him four thumb drives with more data than a man can read in his life. Why? Because I've already done it for several people. Yeah, hundreds of chartsSure, I'll reformat the text into natural paragraphs for easier reading:
Their virtual characters and often react emotionally when they pass away. This attachment doesn't even require a visual representation.
In one of his podcasts, Jason Brashears reported on his experience with a board game Dungeons and Dragons, during his time in prison. According to his account, even hardened felons occasionally burst into tears when their developed altered ego was struck by death.
The sentence that mentions me does so as if I'm providing supporting evidence for the assertion that he made on his own. Did he make it on his own, or is he just not giving credit where credits due? This is my issue.
So page 181. I don't need to rewrite it all in the same sentence. He says, co-creators, that we're all co-creators. Again, he talks about the simulacrum.
Okay, it may be overkill to some of you guys, but you got to understand I was specifically told in an email that this man did not have any contact with the archaic's data. When he published this in Germany, when he published all this in German, in that article in Nexus magazine, I was told something that was not true.
And when I go online and I look at the English translation and like at the beginning of this video, I itemize this entire list of things that were indeed talked about. And I know for a fact they were all also the main topic of discussions in Archaic's videos. Then I have to wonder why this author thought it was so important to include that long passage about me in this book. Why?
So we have a lot of footnotes here, we don't need to read them all. But he's given me credit for Aix. Jason Bershier's coined Aix. He describes what Aix is. He does make a mistake. He says ancient Egyptian writings suggest that each stone in the Great Pyramid, the center of the world, represents an incarnate soul. That is not true. But I can understand how he made that mistake. Those are not ancient Egyptian texts that talk about that. Those are ancient hermetic texts. It's a big difference.
The Hermetic text, the pseudopigraphical Jewish text, and the shepherd of Hermes text, these are the texts that talk about each stone is the soul of man. But yeah, it's also the ancient Vedic text and the traditions of the Altar of Agony, which had 10,800 bricks for the 1080 anis Mundi date of the building of the Great Pyramid. I've already remember ancient Egyptian coffin text. 1080 is the same as the 1080 anis Mundi, the year the Great Pyramid was built. So all those are interconnected. That's an easy mistake to make. It's just not ancient Egyptian text talks about artificial intelligence, maya, Aix, all that, all that's good.
I mean, we already know, he already mentioned me over here about the Aix. But I have to go into detail for you guys here because you have to understand the man chose this name, the Phoenix Hypothesis. And it's basically talking about all the stuff I talk about in the Phoenix phenomenon in Archaics. So we have to separate here where's he going with this book. If you're going to use an immense amount of material that came from me and pretend that that material didn't come from me and that I only influenced your research, then we need to figure out what this book is really about. That's where we're going.
That's where we're going. Because this book isn't about what you think it is. I'm about to show you. Get a few more examples here.
187, page 192 talks about the Nemesis system. Now, as far as I know, I don't know of a single YouTuber, I don't know of any author, I don't know of anything. Nemesis is known because in 1983, which is research that I published in my published books and on my YouTube channel, which this man would have seen is 1983, two independent federal think tanks had two colleges basically go through all this scientific data, the exact same data. They were not allowed to communicate. They were given like six weeks to go through the data and write a thesis. What does this data mean? Both of them nailed it. That there is a cataclysm about to occur to our world. This is in 1983. It was published in 1984. Then it was turned into like a classified document for the federal government. This is the same time that the Iris Space Telescope had seen an object the size of Neptune at the edge of our system.
So that was in 1983. So what is it about 1983 that I just saw? I just saw something about 1983. What it was I lost where I was. Oh the nemesis. That's right. So as far as the Nemesis system being the origin of why we have two ecliptic planes and not one is, I've never seen that anywhere but in Archaics at all. So this is where the nemesis x object comes from. This is where Luna came from before the capture of Luna. This is where our world came from. This world here came from in the simulation. It's where it all came from. This is where all the calendars started. I've got multiple videos showing you how all these ancient calendars started. It was with the appearance of Phoenix. It was the appearance of the moon. It was the appearance of our world. Here started a calendar. It was the appearance of the nemesis X object. 34 39 BC. Killed one third of the world. It was when Enki appeared, later remembered over a thousand years later by the Jewish scribes in Babylon as Enoch. So all this yeah, the term Nemesis system, I've never seen that anywhere but in Archaics, except the gaming. I mean, it's a gaming term. Nemesis system is like role playing games. Nemesis system, it's in like Dungeons and Dragons, but it has nothing to do with a system of a collapsed binary. It's a trade off system.
So, page 200, I understand that his intent is to write to a German audience. That's fine. How do I interpret how am I supposed to interpret this? The author says, I would like to illuminate a few scientific concepts whose understanding is helpful to understand isolated arguments in the Phoenix Hypothesis better, since I have already in this book let the genie of simulation theory, or the idea of our reality as a virtual construct out of the bottle. You let that out of the bottle. I'm just going to move on, guys. If you think this is bad, if you think this is bad, I promise you, you should see the notations I made in Graham Hancock's books. One of these days I may just get tired and just unleash and show you all that cockamonian in those books. Tell you, my books in my library, they look like Bibles. I mark them up, not these old 18 hundreds books. We photocopy these.
So here it is on page 214 in late 2022So I was really surprised to see that 3600 years is promoted by him and the 12,000 year cycle. I have gone ad nauseam on my channel showing how ridiculous those theories are. Ad nauseam, but that's the establishment, the establishment is still pushing that material out. Promise you. And equally, I promise that Randall Carlson, Graham Hancock, Billy Carson, all these dudes that produce these narratives, promise you.
You guys know what? It's been a month or two since I've been calling people out. Not one person stepped up to the plate. I know for a fact Graham Hancock's already been put on notice. So I'm telling you guys, this narrative, these attacks, they're real guys. This book trying to hijack the narrative. Trying to hijack the narrative.
This book leaves ancient aliens and alien invasions still on the table. Of course it can, because it denies the construct. We're on a planet right here. It's in this book. Now.
Also, there is nobody who can watch all my Phoenix videos and not get exposed to the compelling research about Nostradamus that I have shown, the mathematical interpretation of the quattrains, how they are codified, how Nostradamus mentioned. The Phoenix knew about 19, two knew about 2040. Codified, the 138 year Periodicity of the Phoenix, said the sun was going to go dark, the moon was going to turn red, stones are going to fall from the sky. And he did it in four different quadrants that are all dated 2040 in Mario readings, date index.
Not a hint of that in here. Instead, this man cast dispersions excuse me, aspersions At Nostradamus says, it says his material was flowery and just poetry. You got to watch out for that stuff, guys. Really got to watch out for that, because here's three things you really need to know about on page 72. What is archaics. What is Archaics, guys, it's an acronym. Advanced research of chronological history, of artificial intelligence. X archaics is chronology based. This man avoided chronology like the plague. In addition to that, he denigrated it on page 72. He basically told his readers, do not pay attention to chronological models. He said that in this book. So he's willing to call material from the very source that he also denigrates. Yeah, I'm not cool with that at all. Not at all.
And of course he also says that, but the elite know the times. Yeah, it says it in the same paragraph on page 123. One of my biggest problems. And then we're done. Page 123. I'm not convinced that this wasn't all intentional. Twice in this book he provides a list of authors. Listen to this. He can give me all the praise he wants. He spent three pages, four pages giving me praise. He cited me in his bibliography two or three times, although there's about 80 independent facts out of this book. Whole paragraph straight out of my material. That's fine. That's fine. But despite all of that, this is what he says suppose I had to think about summarizing all the publications of Eric von Daniken, David Hatcher, Childress, Graham Hancock, Brad Steger, andrew Tomas, Hans Bellamy, and many other authors. I'm not listed anywhere in there. He knows I'm a published author. He knows I've put a chronological history of the world for which I have challenged many people, and not one person has stepped up to meet that challenge. A debate or anything. Write a thesis. I don't care. I will dissect anything in writing that comes my way. I'm going to give it the same attention I gave to this I don't care. I'm not listed in that. Therefore, I don't bring the value that he's trying to convey Graham Hancock's on this list.
But it goes deeper than that, because the back of the book. The back of the book. Chapter Seven appendix biography of Important Individuals. He goes in here and he basically says, I put my thesis together. This is what he's claiming, I put my thesis together based off Charles Hapgood. Wow. Archaics focuses on Charles Hapgood quite a bit. Con Thomas. He's the one that wrote the Adam and Eve deal. How much of you heard about the Adam and Eve reset on my channel, and I provided way more data than Khan or Can Thomas did for his little CIA redacted deal. Emmanuel Velikovsky. All authors that I cite. Alois Iremere. This is a German. I wouldn't know anything about him. This is a German seer, not a researcher. He's somebody who adds clairvoyant. Claire audio. I don't know anything about him, but this is his source. Some German seer.
Edgar Casey. Another seer. That's not somebody I'm going to cite as a credible source. I'm just not. Edgar Casey put out almost pin, perfect precision medical diagnoses and prognosis under hypnosis. He did that when it came to historical things like the Great Pyramid and all that. He nailed a bunch of stuff. His track record for prophecy is terrible. His predictions are awful. Edgar Casey. Carlos. Carlos Munaz Farada, another mystic seer, I don't know much about him. I don't know much about him, but he's important to this guy. This guy said these are the guys that mainly influenced him when he put together his thesis. Again, Jason's not mentioned anywhere in that list. This is the second list of authors that he provides. This is an appendix.
Yeah. It goes off into all kinds of different concepts, and it breakaway civilizations. Everything here is mentioned by me, but it's also mentioned by other authors, too, so I'm not even worried about that. But yeah, the main problem I have with The Phoenix Hypothesis is that you can't call a tremendous amount of data you're probably watching videos. I don't know how you do it, but you call all this material and then rewrite it, change the sentence structure to make it look like these are your original ideas and not mine, and then turn around and publish huge sections that are 100% influenced from what you you saw or what you read in my published books. I can't accept that when you won't even include me into the two main lists of authors that you highly value, and to take the name The Phoenix Hypothesis and yet not promote anything from where you got this material. Yeah, guys, you have to understand, this book's not about the Phoenix phenomenon. So I can't accuse him of stealing the Phoenix phenomenon material. It's not about the Phoenix phenomenon. It's basically promoting almost the exact opposite of everything that I teach in Archaics. This is a 100% materialist book. He does go for a small period. He goes into the spiritual stuff, but it's an absolute copy of my material on howPlease reformat this text into natural paragraphs for easy reading. Do not add any new text or punctuation. Do not summarize. Do not remove text or censor. Here is the text:
Face tucked in that picture like that. And they shaded the side of my face to make it look just like the shading on that pyramid.
Download the PDF.
Listen, I've already uploaded the PDF. The PDF is already on Podia right now. All I got to do is take the link and put it in the description box. And I'm about to do that right now.
